IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v101y2021i7d10.1007_s10273-021-2966-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der neue Finanzausgleich zwischen Bund und Ländern: erste Ergebnisse und Bewertungen
[The New Federal Fiscal Equalisation System 2020: First Results and Evaluation]

Author

Listed:
  • André W. Heinemann

    (Universität Bremen)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Bereits 2015 wurde erstmalig durch die Konferenz der Ministerpräsident:innen ein neues Finanzausgleichssystem ab 2020 diskutiert und beschlossen. Seitdem sind zahlreiche Beiträge zu den möglichen fiskalischen Auswirkungen, Anreizproblematiken und Bewertungen einiger Detailregelungen entstanden und debattiert worden. Nach der ersten Durchführung im Ausgleichsjahr 2020 ist es nun Zeit, erstmalig auf konkrete Ergebnisse einzugehen und dabei verbliebene und neue Probleme offen zu diskutieren.

Suggested Citation

  • André W. Heinemann, 2021. "Der neue Finanzausgleich zwischen Bund und Ländern: erste Ergebnisse und Bewertungen [The New Federal Fiscal Equalisation System 2020: First Results and Evaluation]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(7), pages 544-551, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:101:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10273-021-2966-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-021-2966-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-021-2966-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-021-2966-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Woisin, 2008. "Das eingerostete Scharnier: Umsatzsteuerverteilung zwischen Bund und Ländern," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 88(7), pages 446-450, July.
    2. Thomas Lenk & Philipp Glinka, 2017. "Der neue bundesstaatliche Finanzausgleich — eine Reform und viel Reformaufschub [The New Financial Equalisation System in Germany — Reform and Perspectives]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(7), pages 506-512, July.
    3. André Heinemann, 2012. "Horizontal oder vertikal? Zur Zukunft des Finanzausgleichs in Deutschland," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 92(7), pages 471-479, July.
    4. Marius Bickmann & Kristina van Deuverden, 2014. "Länderfinanzausgleich vor der Reform: eine Bestandsaufnahme," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(28), pages 671-682.
    5. Wolfgang Renzsch, 2017. "Die verbogene Verfassung — zur Neuregelung der Bund-Länder-Finanzbeziehungen ab 2020," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(12), pages 876-880, December.
    6. Kitterer, Wolfgang, 2007. "Bundesstaatsreform und Zukunft der Finanzverfassung," FiFo Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 07-3, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Achim Truger & Dieter Vesper, 2014. "Zur Reform des Länderfinanzausgleichs ? eine Notwendigkeit?," IMK Studies 37-2014, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Lars P. Feld & Jan Schnellenbach, 2014. "Mehr Autonomie für die Bundesländer: Ansatzpunkte zu einer grundlegenden Reform der Bund-Länder-Finanzbeziehungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(01), pages 32-36, January.
    3. Dörrenberg Philipp & Heinemann Friedrich & Khayal Nuri, 2015. "Reformoptionen für den deutschen Finanzföderalismus," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 26-43, March.
    4. Michael Klien & Hans Pitlik & Matthias Firgo & Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger, 2020. "Ein Modell für einen strukturierten vertikalen Finanzausgleich in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 65854.
    5. Helge Arends, 2017. "Equal Living Conditions vs. Cultural Sovereignty? Federalism Reform, Educational Poverty and Spatial Inequalities in Germany," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 673-706.
    6. Broer Michael, 2019. "Ist im Länderfinanzausgleich die isolierte Berechnung von Grenzentzugsraten für einzelne Steuern sinnvoll?," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 68(1), pages 74-91, May.
    7. Andreas Kappeler & Andrés Fuentes Hutfilter, 2014. "Making Economic Growth more Socially Inclusive in Germany," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1175, OECD Publishing.
    8. Hechtner, Frank, 2013. "Ökonomische Anreizwirkungen im bundesstaatlichen Finanzausgleich," Discussion Papers 2013/15, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • H22 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Incidence
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:101:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10273-021-2966-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.