IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v31y2017i5d10.1007_s11269-017-1597-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generating Synthetic Rainfall Total Using Multivariate Skew-t and Checkerboard Copula of Maximum Entropy

Author

Listed:
  • Noor Fadhilah Ahmad Radi

    (Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Taman Bukit Kubu Jaya
    Universiti Malaysia Pahang)

  • Roslinazairimah Zakaria

    (Universiti Malaysia Pahang)

  • Julia Piantadosi

    (University of South Australia)

  • John Boland

    (University of South Australia)

  • Wan Zawiah Wan Zin

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Az-zuhri Azman

    (Universiti Malaysia Pahang)

Abstract

This study aims to test the appropriateness of multivariate skew-t copula and checkerboard copula of maximum entropy in generating monthly rainfall total data. The generation of synthetic data is important, as it provides hypothetical data in areas for which data availability remains limited. Three selected meteorological stations in Kelantan, Malaysia, Stesen Pertanian Melor, Rumah Pam Salor, and Ladang Lepan Kabu, are considered in this study. Monthly rainfall total data for the driest and wettest months in the year are tested in this study. For these three stations, the identified month with the least total of rainfall received (driest) is May, while the month with the highest total of rainfall received (wettest) is November. The data is fitted to gamma distribution with the corresponding parameters estimated. The observed data will be transformed to be in unit uniform using the gamma marginal. The resulting data is compared to simulated uniform data generated using multivariate skew-t copula and checkerboard copula of maximum entropy models based on the correlation values of the observed and simulated data. Next, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is used to assess the fit between the observed and generated data. The results show that the values of simulated correlation coefficients do not differ much for gamma distribution, multivariate skew-t, and maximum entropy approaches. This implies that the multivariate skew-t and maximum entropy may be used to generate monthly rainfall total for cases in which actual data is unavailable.

Suggested Citation

  • Noor Fadhilah Ahmad Radi & Roslinazairimah Zakaria & Julia Piantadosi & John Boland & Wan Zawiah Wan Zin & Muhammad Az-zuhri Azman, 2017. "Generating Synthetic Rainfall Total Using Multivariate Skew-t and Checkerboard Copula of Maximum Entropy," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(5), pages 1729-1744, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1597-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1597-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-017-1597-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-017-1597-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trivedi, Pravin K. & Zimmer, David M., 2007. "Copula Modeling: An Introduction for Practitioners," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 1(1), pages 1-111, April.
    2. Peng Shi & Miao Wu & Simin Qu & Peng Jiang & Xueyuan Qiao & Xi Chen & Mi Zhou & Zhicai Zhang, 2015. "Spatial Distribution and Temporal Trends in Precipitation Concentration Indices for the Southwest China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(11), pages 3941-3955, September.
    3. Amir AghaKouchak & Nasrin Nasrollahi, 2010. "Semi-parametric and Parametric Inference of Extreme Value Models for Rainfall Data," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(6), pages 1229-1249, April.
    4. Kotz,Samuel & Nadarajah,Saralees, 2004. "Multivariate T-Distributions and Their Applications," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521826549, October.
    5. Adelchi Azzalini & Antonella Capitanio, 2003. "Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t‐distribution," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(2), pages 367-389, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiabo Yin & Shenglian Guo & Zhangjun Liu & Guang Yang & Yixuan Zhong & Dedi Liu, 2018. "Uncertainty Analysis of Bivariate Design Flood Estimation and its Impacts on Reservoir Routing," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1795-1809, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papastathopoulos, Ioannis & Tawn, Jonathan A., 2013. "A generalised Student’s t-distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 70-77.
    2. Kim, Hyoung-Moon & Genton, Marc G., 2011. "Characteristic functions of scale mixtures of multivariate skew-normal distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(7), pages 1105-1117, August.
    3. Yang, Yu-Chen & Lin, Tsung-I & Castro, Luis M. & Wang, Wan-Lun, 2020. "Extending finite mixtures of t linear mixed-effects models with concomitant covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Yu, Donghyeon & Lim, Johan & Liang, Feng & Kim, Kyunga & Kim, Byung Soo & Jang, Woncheol, 2012. "Permutation test for incomplete paired data with application to cDNA microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 510-521.
    5. Mehdi Amiri & Yaser Mehrali & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Ahad Jamalizadeh, 2022. "Efficient recursive computational algorithms for multivariate t and multivariate unified skew-t distributions with applications to inference," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 125-158, March.
    6. Tsung-I Lin & Pal Wu & Geoffrey McLachlan & Sharon Lee, 2015. "A robust factor analysis model using the restricted skew- $$t$$ t distribution," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(3), pages 510-531, September.
    7. Wraith, Darren & Forbes, Florence, 2015. "Location and scale mixtures of Gaussians with flexible tail behaviour: Properties, inference and application to multivariate clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 61-73.
    8. Sreenivasa Rao Jammalamadaka & Emanuele Taufer & Gyorgy H. Terdik, 2021. "On Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 607-644, August.
    9. Kim, Hyoung-Moon & Maadooliat, Mehdi & Arellano-Valle, Reinaldo B. & Genton, Marc G., 2016. "Skewed factor models using selection mechanisms," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 162-177.
    10. Galarza, Christian E. & Matos, Larissa A. & Castro, Luis M. & Lachos, Victor H., 2022. "Moments of the doubly truncated selection elliptical distributions with emphasis on the unified multivariate skew-t distribution," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Takahashi, Makoto & Watanabe, Toshiaki & Omori, Yasuhiro, 2016. "Volatility and quantile forecasts by realized stochastic volatility models with generalized hyperbolic distribution," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 437-457.
    12. Chen, Qihao & Huang, Zhuo & Liang, Fang, 2023. "Measuring systemic risk with high-frequency data: A realized GARCH approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Koen Decancq, 2020. "Measuring cumulative deprivation and affluence based on the diagonal dependence diagram," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 78(2), pages 103-117, August.
    14. Yeap, Claudia & Kwok, Simon S. & Choy, S. T. Boris, 2016. "A Flexible Generalised Hyperbolic Option Pricing Model and its Special Cases," Working Papers 2016-14, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    15. Hu, Shuowen & Poskitt, D.S. & Zhang, Xibin, 2012. "Bayesian adaptive bandwidth kernel density estimation of irregular multivariate distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 732-740.
    16. Jörg Schwiebert, 2016. "Multinomial choice models based on Archimedean copulas," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(3), pages 333-354, July.
    17. Phella, Anthoulla & Gabriel, Vasco J. & Martins, Luis F., 2024. "Predicting tail risks and the evolution of temperatures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren & Patrick Kline & Emmanuel Saez, 2014. "Where is the land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(4), pages 1553-1623.
    19. Mitchell, James & Weale, Martin, 2019. "Forecasting with Unknown Unknowns: Censoring and Fat Tails on the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee," EMF Research Papers 27, Economic Modelling and Forecasting Group.
    20. Tobias Adrian & Nina Boyarchenko & Domenico Giannone, 2019. "Vulnerable Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(4), pages 1263-1289, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1597-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.