IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v28y2014i4p915-932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Weather Generators Robust Tools to Study Daily Reference Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirement?

Author

Listed:
  • Behnam Ababaei

Abstract

Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is one of the driving forces in crop simulation models and is very important to be estimated accurately. Moreover, weather generator (WG) models are widely used in combination with these crop models. As the quality of model output is related to the quality of weather data used as input, the evaluation of the sensitivity of model outputs to the quality of generated weather data is essential. In this study, eight different weather generator models were assessed and their outputs were used to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration and irrigation requirement. Two daily weather generator algorithms were combined with a monthly weather generator and/or an adjustment algorithm for low-frequency variances. Precipitation occurrence series was generated by an independent semi-empirical distribution. The daily weather generators outperformed the monthly models in reproducing daily statistics, while the monthly models performed better in simulating the monthly and yearly variations. After analyzing the model performances in simulating climatic variables, more assessments were carried out on ETo and irrigation requirement. The results depicted the strength of all the models in simulating daily ETo and irrigation requirement. Although all the studied models have comparable performances in simulating these two daily variables on daily and monthly scales, the monthly WGs outperform the daily models on yearly time scales and have better performances in simulating standard deviation values of yearly mean ETo and irrigation requirement. It can be concluded that WG models are robust tools for estimating these two daily variables if they can at least reproduce daily statistics (i.e. mean and standard deviation) well. But it must be taken in considerations that each WG model (including the one studied here) has different weaknesses and strengths and the best choice must be done according to the requirements. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Behnam Ababaei, 2014. "Are Weather Generators Robust Tools to Study Daily Reference Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirement?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(4), pages 915-932, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:4:p:915-932
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0524-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-014-0524-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-014-0524-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthews, R. B. & Kropff, M. J. & Horie, T. & Bachelet, D., 1997. "Simulating the impact of climate change on rice production in Asia and evaluating options for adaptation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 399-425, July.
    2. Nonhebel, Sanderine, 1994. "The effects of use of average instead of daily weather data in crop growth simulation models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 377-396.
    3. Sharma, Ashish & Lall, Upmanu, 1999. "A nonparametric approach for daily rainfall simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 361-371.
    4. Alexandris, S. & Kerkides, P. & Liakatas, A., 2006. "Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by the "Copais" approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 371-386, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Majidi & A. Alizadeh & M. Vazifedoust & A. Farid & T. Ahmadi, 2015. "Analysis of the Effect of Missing Weather Data on Estimating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Under Different Climatic Conditions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2107-2124, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Rishabh & Mishra, Ashok, 2019. "Climate change induced impact and uncertainty of rice yield of agro-ecological zones of India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-11.
    2. F. Castro-Llanos & G. Hyman & J. Rubiano & J. Ramirez-Villegas & H. Achicanoy, 2019. "Climate change favors rice production at higher elevations in Colombia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 1401-1430, December.
    3. W.Neil Adger, 2001. "Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(7), pages 921-931.
    4. Jonatan A. Lassa & Allen Yu-Hung Lai & Tian Goh, 2016. "Climate extremes: an observation and projection of its impacts on food production in ASEAN," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(1), pages 19-33, November.
    5. Stephens, William & Hess, Tim, 1999. "Systems approaches to water management research," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 3-13, March.
    6. Gillian Rose & Tom Osborne & Helen Greatrex & Tim Wheeler, 2016. "Impact of progressive global warming on the global-scale yield of maize and soybean," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 417-428, February.
    7. Richard Petritsch & Hubert Hasenauer, 2014. "Climate input parameters for real-time online risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(3), pages 1749-1762, February.
    8. Shiri, Jalal, 2017. "Evaluation of FAO56-PM, empirical, semi-empirical and gene expression programming approaches for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in hyper-arid regions of Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 101-114.
    9. Tao Li & Olivyn Angeles & Ando Radanielson & Manuel Marcaida & Emmali Manalo, 2015. "Drought stress impacts of climate change on rainfed rice in South Asia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 709-720, December.
    10. Lee, Jaehyuk & Nadolnyak, Denis A. & Hartarska, Valentina M., 2012. "Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Production in Asian Countries: Evidence from Panel Study," 2012 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama 119808, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Isaure Delaporte & Mathilde Maurel, 2018. "Adaptation to climate change in Bangladesh," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 49-62, January.
    12. Chhinh Nyda & Cheb Hoeurn & Poch Bunnak, 2016. "Quantitative Analysis of Household Vulnerability to Climate Change in Kampong Speu Province, Cambodia," EEPSEA Research Report rr20160316, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Mar 2016.
    13. Hong, Sokuntheavy & Furuya, Jun, 2016. "Effects of Climate Change on Supply and Demand of Rice in Cambodia," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 18.
    14. McMahan Christopher & Baurley James & Bridges William & Joyner Chase & Kacamarga Muhamad Fitra & Lund Robert & Pardamean Carissa & Pardamean Bens, 2017. "A Bayesian hierarchical model for identifying significant polygenic effects while controlling for confounding and repeated measures," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 16(5-6), pages 407-419, December.
    15. Mohammed Mainuddin & Mac Kirby & Chu Hoanh, 2013. "Impact of climate change on rainfed rice and options for adaptation in the lower Mekong Basin," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(2), pages 905-938, March.
    16. Gillian Rose & Tom Osborne & Helen Greatrex & Tim Wheeler, 2016. "Impact of progressive global warming on the global-scale yield of maize and soybean," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 417-428, February.
    17. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    18. Marco Moriondo & Marco Bindi & Zbigniew Kundzewicz & M. Szwed & A. Chorynski & P. Matczak & M. Radziejewski & D. McEvoy & Anita Wreford, 2010. "Impact and adaptation opportunities for European agriculture in response to climatic change and variability," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 657-679, October.
    19. Hijmans, R. J. & Condori, B. & Carrillo, R. & Kropff, M. J., 2003. "A quantitative and constraint-specific method to assess the potential impact of new agricultural technology: the case of frost resistant potato for the Altiplano (Peru and Bolivia)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 895-911, June.
    20. Chatzithomas, C.D. & Alexandris, S.G., 2015. "Solar radiation and relative humidity based, empirical method, to estimate hourly reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 188-197.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:4:p:915-932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.