IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v28y2014i15p5389-5409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Algorithm for Sustainability Based Assessment of Reservoir Life Cycle Cost Using Fuzzy Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Hamid Vahdat–Aboueshagh
  • Sara Nazif
  • Ebrahim Shahghasemi

Abstract

Sustainability assessment can be used as a basic managerial analysis to evaluate the capability of water resources in supplying associated demands. Alteration of management policies in order to improve the systems’ performance and sustainability can lead to additional costs of system operation. In this study a novel framework is proposed for assessing economic life cycle costs of dams considering system’s performance from sustainability aspect. For convenience, the term Life Cycle Costs (LCC) is used instead of Economic LCC throughout this paper. First, a fuzzy model is proposed to discount and estimate the LCC of dams in different time intervals of their life span including: Construction, Operation and Maintenance (M&O), and Disposal periods. The model is capable of reflecting uncertainties caused by estimation and previsions of different costs because of fuzzy theory application. Then, sustainability of dam performance in operation period is evaluated through triple criteria of Reliability, Reversibility, and Vulnerability (R-R-V). To provide more realistic results, different system performance levels are defined based on the system’s capability to supply demands and the importance of each level is evaluated by weighting them. Furthermore, it is studied how changes in reservoirs operation strategies can reduce the LCC because of higher performance. The proposed methodology is applied to assess the LCC and performance of a dam located at North Eastern part of Iran. The results show that the system’s performance is remarkably enhanced when the operating rules are revised and this change will intangibly reduce the economic benefits. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Hamid Vahdat–Aboueshagh & Sara Nazif & Ebrahim Shahghasemi, 2014. "Development of an Algorithm for Sustainability Based Assessment of Reservoir Life Cycle Cost Using Fuzzy Theory," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(15), pages 5389-5409, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:15:p:5389-5409
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0808-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-014-0808-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-014-0808-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Assem Al-Hajj & Malcolm Horner, 1998. "Modelling the running costs of buildings," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 459-470.
    2. Laura, Castro-Santos & Vicente, Diaz-Casas, 2014. "Life-cycle cost analysis of floating offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 41-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Elyamany & Walaa El-Nashar, 2016. "Estimating Life Cycle Cost of Improved Field Irrigation Canal," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 99-113, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walgern, Julia & Peters, Lennart & Madlener, Reinhard, 2017. "Economic Evaluation of Maintenance Strategies for Offshore Wind Turbines Based on Condition Monitoring Systems," FCN Working Papers 8/2017, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    2. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J., 2022. "Operation and maintenance for floating wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Koh, J.H. & Ng, E.Y.K., 2016. "Downwind offshore wind turbines: Opportunities, trends and technical challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 797-808.
    4. Yang Lu & Liping Sun & Yanzhuo Xue, 2021. "Research on a Comprehensive Maintenance Optimization Strategy for an Offshore Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Centeno-Telleria, Manu & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Penalba, Markel, 2023. "Computationally efficient analytical O&M model for strategic decision-making in offshore renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Nurullah Yildiz & Hassan Hemida & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2024. "Operation, Maintenance, and Decommissioning Cost in Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Robert Kasner & Weronika Kruszelnicka & Patrycja Bałdowska-Witos & Józef Flizikowski & Andrzej Tomporowski, 2020. "Sustainable Wind Power Plant Modernization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Varvara Mytilinou & Estivaliz Lozano-Minguez & Athanasios Kolios, 2018. "A Framework for the Selection of Optimum Offshore Wind Farm Locations for Deployment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Abel Arredondo-Galeana & Feargal Brennan, 2021. "Floating Offshore Vertical Axis Wind Turbines: Opportunities, Challenges and Way Forward," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Li, Xiaodong & Ouelhadj, Djamila & Song, Xiang & Jones, Dylan & Wall, Graham & Howell, Kerry E. & Igwe, Paul & Martin, Simon & Song, Dongping & Pertin, Emmanuel, 2016. "A decision support system for strategic maintenance planning in offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 784-799.
    11. Shamsan Alsubal & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Eu Lim Shawn & M. S. Liew & Pavitirakumar Palaniappan & Muhammad Ali Musarat, 2021. "Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm: Kudat Malaysia Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Judge, Frances & McAuliffe, Fiona Devoy & Sperstad, Iver Bakken & Chester, Rachel & Flannery, Brian & Lynch, Katie & Murphy, Jimmy, 2019. "A lifecycle financial analysis model for offshore wind farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 370-383.
    13. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Faiz, Tasnim Ibn, 2016. "Minimizing maintenance cost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunistic preventive strategy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 104-113.
    15. Zhou, Shengtao & Li, Chao & Xiao, Yiqing & Wang, Xiaolu & Xiang, Wenyuan & Sun, Qing, 2023. "Evaluation of floating wind turbine substructure designs by using long-term dynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    16. Mytilinou, Varvara & Kolios, Athanasios J., 2019. "Techno-economic optimisation of offshore wind farms based on life cycle cost analysis on the UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 439-454.
    17. Pascual, R. & Del Castillo, G. & Louit, D. & Knights, P., 2009. "Business-oriented prioritization: A novel graphical technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1308-1313.
    18. Meng, Fanyi & Bai, Yang & Jin, Jingliang, 2021. "An advanced real-time dispatching strategy for a distributed energy system based on the reinforcement learning algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 13-24.
    19. Lopez, Javier Contreras & Kolios, Athanasios & Wang, Lin & Chiachio, Manuel & Dimitrov, Nikolay, 2024. "Reliability-based leading edge erosion maintenance strategy selection framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    20. Ren, Zhengru & Verma, Amrit Shankar & Li, Ye & Teuwen, Julie J.E. & Jiang, Zhiyu, 2021. "Offshore wind turbine operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:15:p:5389-5409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.