IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v25y2011i7p1831-1853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Practice and Future Challenges in Coastal Aquifer Management: Flux-Based and Trigger-Level Approaches with Application to an Australian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Werner
  • Darren Alcoe
  • Carlos Ordens
  • John Hutson
  • James Ward
  • Craig Simmons

Abstract

The control of groundwater abstraction from coastal aquifers is typically aimed at minimizing the risk of seawater intrusion, excessive storage depletion and adverse impacts on groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Published approaches to the operational management of groundwater abstraction from regulated coastal aquifers comprise elements of “trigger-level management” and “flux-based management”. Trigger-level management relies on measured groundwater levels, groundwater salinities and/or ecosystem health indicators, which are compared to objective values (trigger levels), thereby invoking management responses (e.g. pumping cut-backs). Flux-based management apportions groundwater abstraction rates based on estimates of aquifer recharge and discharge (including environmental water requirements). This paper offers a critical evaluation of coastal aquifer management paradigms using published coastal aquifer case studies combined with a simple evaluation of the Uley South coastal aquifer, South Australia. There is evidence that trigger-level management offers advantages over flux-based approaches through the evaluation of real-time resource conditions and trends, allowing for management responses aimed at protecting against water quality deterioration and excessive storage depletion. However, flux-based approaches are critical for planning purposes, and are required to predict aquifer responses to climatic and pumping stresses. A simplified modelling analysis of the Uley South basin responses to different management strategies demonstrates the advantages of considering a hybrid management approach that includes both trigger-level and flux-based controls. It is recommended that where possible, trigger-level and flux-based approaches be adopted conjunctively to minimize the risk of coastal groundwater degradation and to underpin strategies for future aquifer management and well-field operation. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Werner & Darren Alcoe & Carlos Ordens & John Hutson & James Ward & Craig Simmons, 2011. "Current Practice and Future Challenges in Coastal Aquifer Management: Flux-Based and Trigger-Level Approaches with Application to an Australian Case Study," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(7), pages 1831-1853, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:25:y:2011:i:7:p:1831-1853
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-011-9777-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-011-9777-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-011-9777-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zekri, Slim, 2008. "Using economic incentives and regulations to reduce seawater intrusion in the Batinah coastal area of Oman," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 243-252, March.
    2. Don, Nguyen Cao & Hang, Nguyen Thi Minh & Araki, Hiroyuki & Yamanishi, Hiroyuki & Koga, Kenichi, 2006. "Groundwater resources and management for paddy field irrigation and associated environmental problems in an alluvial coastal lowland plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 295-304, August.
    3. Gabor Bekesi & Megan McGuire & Dean Moiler, 2009. "Groundwater Allocation Using a Groundwater Level Response Management Method—Gnangara Groundwater System, Western Australia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(9), pages 1665-1683, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Concepcion Pla & Javier Valdes-Abellan & Antonio Jose Tenza-Abril & David Benavente, 2016. "Predicting Daily Water Table Fluctuations in Karstic Aquifers from GIS-Based Modelling, Climatic Settings and Extraction Wells," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(7), pages 2531-2545, May.
    2. Pallavi Chattopadhyay & Nimisha Vedanti & V. Singh, 2015. "A Conceptual Numerical Model to Simulate Aquifer Parameters," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(3), pages 771-784, February.
    3. K. Mazi & A. D. Koussis & G. Destouni, 2016. "Quantifying a Sustainable Management Space for Human Use of Coastal Groundwater under Multiple Change Pressures," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(12), pages 4063-4080, September.
    4. Mohsen Sherif & Anvar Kacimov & Akbar Javadi & Abdel Ebraheem, 2012. "Modeling Groundwater Flow and Seawater Intrusion in the Coastal Aquifer of Wadi Ham, UAE," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(3), pages 751-774, February.
    5. I. Holman & K. Rushton & T. Simpson, 2013. "The Benefits of Spatially Targeted Water Level Management for Salinity Reduction in a Coastal Aquifer," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(1), pages 169-186, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian Werner & Qi Zhang & Lijuan Xue & Brian Smerdon & Xianghu Li & Xinjun Zhu & Lei Yu & Ling Li, 2013. "An Initial Inventory and Indexation of Groundwater Mega-Depletion Cases," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(2), pages 507-533, January.
    2. Amar Oukil & Slim Zekri, 2021. "Investigating farming efficiency through a two stage analytical approach: Application to the agricultural sector in Northern Oman," Papers 2104.10943, arXiv.org.
    3. Zhang, Fan & Fogarty, James, 2015. "Nonmarket Valuation of Water Sensitive Cities: Current Knowledge and Issues," Working Papers 207694, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Skurray, James H. & Pannell, David J., 2013. "Potential approaches to the management of third-party impacts from groundwater transfers: Managing externalities from groundwater trading," Working Papers 161074, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. M. Dinesh Kumar, 2016. "Distressed Elephants: Policy Initiatives for Sustainable Groundwater Management in India," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 5(1), pages 51-62, January.
    6. Arianna Renau-Pruñonosa & Ignacio Morell & David Pulido-Velazquez, 2016. "A Methodology to Analyse and Assess Pumping Management Strategies in Coastal Aquifers to Avoid Degradation Due to Seawater Intrusion Problems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(13), pages 4823-4837, October.
    7. Eric C. Edwards & Todd Guilfoos, 2021. "The Economics of Groundwater Governance Institutions across the Globe," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1571-1594, December.
    8. Kaur, S. & Pollitt, M. G., 2024. "Using rewards and penalties to incentivize energy and water saving behaviour in agriculture – Evidence from a choice experiment in Punjab," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2434, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    9. Wen-Ping Tsai & Yen-Ming Chiang & Jun-Lin Huang & Fi-John Chang, 2016. "Exploring the Mechanism of Surface and Ground Water through Data-Driven Techniques with Sensitivity Analysis for Water Resources Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(13), pages 4789-4806, October.
    10. Kumar, M. D. & Amarasinghe, Upali A. & Sharma, Bharat R. & Trivedi, Kairav & Singh, O. P. & Sikka, Alok K. & van Dam, Jos C., 2009. "Water productivity improvements in Indian Agriculture: potentials, constraints and prospects," IWMI Conference Proceedings 260570, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Ayres, Andrew B. & Edwards, Eric C. & Libecap, Gary D., 2018. "How transaction costs obstruct collective action: The case of California's groundwater," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 46-65.
    12. Kumar, M. Dinesh & Amarasinghe, Upali A., 2009. "Water productivity improvements in Indian agriculture: potentials, constraints and prospects," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    13. Andrew B. Ayres & Eric C. Edwards & Gary D. Libecap, 2017. "How Transaction Costs Obstruct Collective Action: Evidence from California’s Groundwater," NBER Working Papers 23382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Jae Min Lee & Jong Hoon Park & Euijin Chung & Nam C. Woo, 2018. "Assessment of Groundwater Drought in the Mangyeong River Basin, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Zekri, Slim & Madani, Kaveh & Bazargan-Lari, Mohammad Reza & Kotagama, Hemesiri & Kalbus, Edda, 2017. "Feasibility of adopting smart water meters in aquifer management: An integrated hydro-economic analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 85-93.
    16. Kumar, M. Dinesh, 2009. "Opportunities and constraints to improving water productivity in India," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    17. Edwards, Eric C. & Guilfoos, Todd, 2020. "The Economics of Groundwater Governance Institutions Across the Globe," CEnREP Working Papers 340056, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. Kumar, M. Dinesh & Amarasinghe, Upali A., 2009. "Water productivity improvements in Indian agriculture: potentials, constraints and prospects," IWMI Books, Reports H042634, International Water Management Institute.
    19. Kumar, M. Dinesh, 2009. "Opportunities and constraints to improving water productivity in India," IWMI Books, Reports H042640, International Water Management Institute.
    20. Slim Zekri & Chefi Triki & Ali Al-Maktoumi & Mohammad Bazargan-Lari, 2015. "An Optimization-Simulation Approach for Groundwater Abstraction under Recharge Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(10), pages 3681-3695, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:25:y:2011:i:7:p:1831-1853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.