IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v20y2006i3p377-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Fuzzy Multi-Objective Function on Reducing Groundwater Demand for Aquaculture in Land-Subsidence Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Tao-Chang Yang
  • Pao-Shan Yu

Abstract

In Taiwan, due to its relatively low development cost, groundwater has been the main source of water supply for most aquacultural industry in costal areas. The overdraft of groundwater has caused serious land-subsidence in many parts of Taiwan. In addition to providing enough surface water for aquaculture freshwater demand, revising the aquaculture structure is one approach to reduce the reliance on fresh groundwater. Due to the most serious land-subsidence in Tachen Village, Changhua County, Taiwan, which may be caused by overusing groundwater for mainly raising freshwater clams, alternative techniques, such as changing the method of water use or revising the kinds of fish with less freshwater demands and higher gross profits, were studied in the study to reduce the dependence on fresh groundwater. The fuzzy multi-objective function comprising three single-objectives, viz. reducing saltwater demand, reducing freshwater demand, and increasing the total fisheries gross profit, was coupled with a global optimization algorithm to find suitable aquaculture scenarios in the study area. Analytical results can be provided to the fisheries authorities as references for revising the aquaculture structure. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Tao-Chang Yang & Pao-Shan Yu, 2006. "Application of Fuzzy Multi-Objective Function on Reducing Groundwater Demand for Aquaculture in Land-Subsidence Areas," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(3), pages 377-390, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:20:y:2006:i:3:p:377-390
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-006-0321-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-006-0321-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-006-0321-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Figueira, Jose & Roy, Bernard, 2002. "Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 317-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bojan Srdjevic & Yvonilde Medeiros, 2008. "Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(7), pages 877-894, July.
    2. Chang, Hung-Hao & Boisvert, Richard N. & Hung, Ling-Yi, 2010. "Land subsidence, production efficiency, and the decision of aquacultural firms in Taiwan to discontinue production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2448-2456, October.
    3. Wei Yang & Zhifeng Yang, 2010. "An Interactive Fuzzy Satisfying Approach for Sustainable Water Management in the Yellow River Delta, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(7), pages 1273-1284, May.
    4. Bijuan Huang & Longcang Shu & Y. Yang, 2012. "Groundwater Overexploitation Causing Land Subsidence: Hazard Risk Assessment Using Field Observation and Spatial Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(14), pages 4225-4239, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haurant, P. & Oberti, P. & Muselli, M., 2011. "Multicriteria selection aiding related to photovoltaic plants on farming fields on Corsica island: A real case study using the ELECTRE outranking framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 676-688, February.
    2. Roy, Bernard & Slowinski, Roman, 2008. "Handling effects of reinforced preference and counter-veto in credibility of outranking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 185-190, July.
    3. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Figueira, José Rui & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2020. "Using a Choquet integral-based approach for incorporating decision-maker’s preference judgments in a Data Envelopment Analysis model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1016-1030.
    4. Ana Sara Costa & Isabella M. Lami & Salvatore Greco & José Rui Figueira & José Borbinha, 2021. "Assigning a house for refugees: an application of a multiple criteria nominal classification method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2651-2687, December.
    5. Merad, Myriam & Dechy, Nicolas & Serir, Lisa & Grabisch, Michel & Marcel, Frédéric, 2013. "Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 603-613.
    6. Bottero, M. & Ferretti, V. & Figueira, J.R. & Greco, S. & Roy, B., 2018. "On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 120-140.
    7. Jabeur, Khaled & Martel, Jean-Marc, 2007. "An ordinal sorting method for group decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1272-1289, August.
    8. Rolandas Drejeris & Astrida Miceikiene & Jurgita Baranauskiene, 2021. "A New Approach to Entrepreneurship Measurement of Agricultural Business Entities: A Case of Lithuania," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    9. Concetta Manuela La Fata & Toni Lupo & Tommaso Piazza, 2019. "Service quality benchmarking via a novel approach based on fuzzy ELECTRE III and IPA: an empirical case involving the Italian public healthcare context," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 106-120, March.
    10. Rocha, António & Costa, Ana Sara & Figueira, José Rui & Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Quality assessment of the Portuguese public hospitals: A multiple criteria approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Katharina Gompf & Marzia Traverso & Jörg Hetterich, 2021. "Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-10, January.
    12. Siskos, Eleftherios & Burgherr, Peter, 2022. "Multicriteria decision support for the evaluation of electricity supply resilience: Exploration of interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 611-626.
    13. Theodorou, Savvas & Florides, Georgios & Tassou, Savvas, 2010. "The use of multiple criteria decision making methodologies for the promotion of RES through funding schemes in Cyprus, A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7783-7792, December.
    14. Liao, Huchang & Wu, Xingli & Mi, Xiaomei & Herrera, Francisco, 2020. "An integrated method for cognitive complex multiple experts multiple criteria decision making based on ELECTRE III with weighted Borda rule," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Silvia Angilella & Sebastiano Mazz`u, 2013. "The Financing of Innovative SMEs: a multicriteria credit rating model," Papers 1308.0889, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2014.
    16. Leydiana Sousa Pereira & Danielle Costa Morais, 2020. "Multicriteria Decision Model to Establish Maintenance Priorities for Wells in a Groundwater System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(1), pages 377-392, January.
    17. Danielle Costa Morais & Adiel Teixeira Almeida & José Rui Figueira, 2014. "A Sorting Model for Group Decision Making: A Case Study of Water Losses in Brazil," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 937-960, September.
    18. Mercè Sala-Rios & Teresa Torres-Solé & Mariona Farré-Perdiguer, 0. "Can a Multi-Criteria Methodology Fit with Non-Profit Institutions’ Decision-Making? An Application in a Spanish Non-Profit Association," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    19. Harrison Mutikanga & Saroj Sharma & Kalanithy Vairavamoorthy, 2011. "Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Strategic Planning Tool for Water Loss Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(14), pages 3947-3969, November.
    20. Amin Mahmoudi & Saad Ahmed Javed & Abbas Mardani, 2022. "Gresilient supplier selection through Fuzzy Ordinal Priority Approach: decision-making in post-COVID era," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 208-232, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:20:y:2006:i:3:p:377-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.