IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v67y2018i2d10.1007_s11235-017-0334-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defending against phishing attacks: taxonomy of methods, current issues and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • B. B. Gupta

    (National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra)

  • Nalin A. G. Arachchilage

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • Kostas E. Psannis

    (University of Macedonia)

Abstract

Internet technology is so pervasive today, for example, from online social networking to online banking, it has made people’s lives more comfortable. Due the growth of Internet technology, security threats to systems and networks are relentlessly inventive. One such a serious threat is “phishing”, in which, attackers attempt to steal the user’s credentials using fake emails or websites or both. It is true that both industry and academia are working hard to develop solutions to combat against phishing threats. It is therefore very important that organisations to pay attention to end-user awareness in phishing threat prevention. Therefore, aim of our paper is twofold. First, we will discuss the history of phishing attacks and the attackers’ motivation in details. Then, we will provide taxonomy of various types of phishing attacks. Second, we will provide taxonomy of various solutions proposed in literature to protect users from phishing based on the attacks identified in our taxonomy. Moreover, we have also discussed impact of phishing attacks in Internet of Things (IoTs). We conclude our paper discussing various issues and challenges that still exist in the literature, which are important to fight against with phishing threats.

Suggested Citation

  • B. B. Gupta & Nalin A. G. Arachchilage & Kostas E. Psannis, 2018. "Defending against phishing attacks: taxonomy of methods, current issues and future directions," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 247-267, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:67:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11235-017-0334-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-017-0334-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-017-0334-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-017-0334-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joakim Kävrestad & Allex Hagberg & Marcus Nohlberg & Jana Rambusch & Robert Roos & Steven Furnell, 2022. "Evaluation of Contextual and Game-Based Training for Phishing Detection," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Aurélien Baillon & Jeroen de Bruin & Aysil Emirmahmutoglu & Evelien van de Veer & Bram van Dijk, 2019. "Informing, simulating experience, or both : A field experiment on phishing risks," Post-Print hal-04325609, HAL.
    3. Altyeb Taha, 2021. "Intelligent Ensemble Learning Approach for Phishing Website Detection Based on Weighted Soft Voting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib & Panagiotis Tsigaris, 2020. "Spam emails in academia: issues and costs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 1171-1188, February.
    5. Dipankar Dasgupta & Zahid Akhtar & Sajib Sen, 2022. "Machine learning in cybersecurity: a comprehensive survey," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 19(1), pages 57-106, January.
    6. Robert Karamagi, 2022. "A Review of Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Phishing," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Abdul Basit & Maham Zafar & Xuan Liu & Abdul Rehman Javed & Zunera Jalil & Kashif Kifayat, 2021. "A comprehensive survey of AI-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 139-154, January.
    8. Aurélien Baillon & Jeroen de Bruin & Aysil Emirmahmutoglu & Evelien van de Veer & Bram van Dijk, 2019. "Informing, simulating experience, or both: A field experiment on phishing risks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:67:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11235-017-0334-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.