IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v37y2024i6d10.1007_s11213-024-09685-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reimagining Famagusta: The Dialogic Design Theory of Change in action

Author

Listed:
  • Romina Laouri

    (Unearthed LLC)

  • Ilke Dagli

    (Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development)

  • Derya Beyatli

    (İnsan Hakları Platformu - Human Rights Platform)

  • Marios Michaelides

    (Future Worlds Center)

  • Mustafa Damdelen

    (Cyprus EU Association)

  • Yiannis Laouris

    (Future Worlds Center)

Abstract

This study presents a dialogic design theory of change through a three-stage process—developing a shared vision, identifying challenges (Problématique), and formulating effective actions—illustrated by the "Famagusta Revival Project" in Cyprus. This action research project engaged participants in three Structured Democratic Dialogues to envision an ideal future for the deserted part of Famagusta, pinpoint obstacles, and devise an action plan. Key outcomes include the proposal of a tax-free, self-governed international hub under EU or UN oversight, the creation of a policy-guiding think tank, and a communication strategy to reframe Famagusta as a unified city. Participants identified critical barriers such as insufficient dialogue on citizenship and diversity, lack of proactive leadership, and the impact of the Annan Plan's rejection. Proposed actions focus on establishing think tanks and lobbying groups to influence government and EU policies, and organizing common activities bringing together more teams to create a better understanding and common approach. Amidst the backdrop of global challenges, this study underscores the importance of action-research-based dialogues and systems science in peacebuilding efforts, offering recommendations for applying these insights to frozen conflicts worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Romina Laouri & Ilke Dagli & Derya Beyatli & Marios Michaelides & Mustafa Damdelen & Yiannis Laouris, 2024. "Reimagining Famagusta: The Dialogic Design Theory of Change in action," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 1043-1067, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-024-09685-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-024-09685-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-024-09685-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-024-09685-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kivanç Ulusoy, 2008. "The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 309-329.
    2. Yiannis Laouris, 2023. "Method to integrate asynchronously produced individual influence maps into an extrapolated population influence map following the face‐to‐face stage of a structured democratic dialogue," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 437-450, May.
    3. Laouris, Yiannis & Michaelides, Marios, 2018. "Structured Democratic Dialogue: An application of a mathematical problem structuring method to facilitate reforms with local authorities in Cyprus," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 918-931.
    4. Yiannis Laouris & Kevin Dye, 2024. "Multi‐stakeholder structured dialogues: Five generations of evolution of dialogic design," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 368-389, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lo Shih-Hui & Lian Shih-Ming & Chang Reed-Joe, 2024. "The Growth Dynamics of the Restaurant Industry from Single Store to Chain Store in Taiwan: A Systems Thinking Perspective," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 1141-1159, December.
    2. White, Leroy, 2018. "A Cook's tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 784-797.
    3. Gerald Midgley & Erik Lindhult, 2021. "A systems perspective on systemic innovation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 635-670, October.
    4. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Midgley, Gerald & Hodgson, Anthony M., 2020. "Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 321-340.
    5. Durugbo, Christopher M., 2020. "Affordance-based problem structuring for workplace innovation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 617-631.
    6. Helfgott, Ariella & Midgley, Gerald & Chaudhury, Abrar & Vervoort, Joost & Sova, Chase & Ryan, Alex, 2023. "Multi-level participation in integrative, systemic planning: The case of climate adaptation in Ghana," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1201-1217.
    7. Bo Yang & Joane V. Serrano & Markus A. Launer & Lulu Wang & Kamran Rabiei, 2023. "A comprehensive and systematic study on the cybernetics management systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 479-504, June.
    8. Yiannis Laouris & Kevin Dye, 2024. "Multi‐stakeholder structured dialogues: Five generations of evolution of dialogic design," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 368-389, March.
    9. Michaelides, Marios & Laouris, Yiannis, 2024. "A cascading model of stakeholder engagement for large-scale regional development using structured dialogical design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 307-323.
    10. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm & Fernando Schramm, 2023. "Problem Structuring Methods in Social-Ecological Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 461-478, June.
    11. Sydelko, Pamela & Midgley, Gerald & Espinosa, Angela, 2021. "Designing interagency responses to wicked problems: Creating a common, cross-agency understanding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 250-263.
    12. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    13. Yiannis Laouris, 2023. "Method to integrate asynchronously produced individual influence maps into an extrapolated population influence map following the face‐to‐face stage of a structured democratic dialogue," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 437-450, May.
    14. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2023. "Holistic Flexibility for Deploying Systems Thinking as a Cognitive Skill," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 803-825, October.
    15. Midgley, Gerald & Johnson, Michael P. & Chichirau, George, 2018. "What is Community Operational Research?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 771-783.
    16. Laouris, Yiannis & Romm, Norma RA, 2022. "Structured dialogical design as a problem structuring method illustrated in a Re-invent democracy project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1072-1087.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-024-09685-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.