IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v37y2024i6d10.1007_s11213-024-09679-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-Technical Principles and Agile Values in the Software Industry: A Technical Report

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Jácome de Moura

    (Universidade Federal da Paraíba, UFPB)

Abstract

This technical report explores the implementation of a new socio-technical work system in an ERP software company serving the healthcare sector, by addressing a knowledge gap in how such companies integrate socio-technical principles with agile values. Using a four-month action research approach, we developed, evaluated, and refined a socio-technical work system integrating social and technical elements. Findings show that software companies face difficulties incorporating some socio-technical principles related to agile values and data-oriented performance, such as “minimal critical specification”, “variance control”, “information flow” and “support congruence”, and reveal that the difficulties of transitioning from an organization based on traditional/bureaucratic principles to an organization based on an organic structure (adhocratic, for example) are still not sufficiently known nor understood. This study also highlights current conflicts in the software industry related to (a) an expectation of agile and data-oriented performance, and (b) a reality rooted in the bureaucratic tradition of work organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Jácome de Moura, 2024. "Socio-Technical Principles and Agile Values in the Software Industry: A Technical Report," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 959-983, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-024-09679-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-024-09679-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-024-09679-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-024-09679-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Van Staveren, 2007. "Beyond Utilitarianism and Deontology: Ethics in Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 21-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terry R. Adler & Thomas G. Pittz & Hank B. Strevel & Dina Denney & Susan D. Steiner & Elizabeth S. Adler, 2022. "Team Over-Empowerment in Market Research: A Virtue-Based Ethics Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 159-173, February.
    2. Harsman Tandilittin, 2016. "What should the Government do to Stop Epidemic of Smoking among Teenagers in Indonesia?," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 140-140, March.
    3. R. Rajesh, 2023. "Grey Markov Models for Predicting the Social Sustainability Performances of Firms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 297-351, August.
    4. Brenda Nguyen & Mary Crossan, 2022. "Character-Infused Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 171-191, June.
    5. Albert D. Spalding & Gretchen R. Lawrie, 2019. "A Critical Examination of the AICPA’s New “Conceptual Framework” Ethics Protocol," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1135-1152, April.
    6. Timothy C. Johnson, 2013. "Reciprocity as the foundation of Financial Economics," Papers 1310.2798, arXiv.org.
    7. Benedetta Giovanola, 2009. "Re-Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capabilities Enhancement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 431-444, September.
    8. Timothy C. Johnson, 2012. "Ethics and Finance: the role of mathematics," Papers 1210.5390, arXiv.org.
    9. Gerasimos T. Soldatos & Erotokritos Varelas, 2015. "A first formal approach to animal spirits beyond uncertainty," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 4(2), pages 104-117, December.
    10. Safarzyńska, Karolina, 2013. "Evolutionary-economic policies for sustainable consumption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 187-195.
    11. Paul Koster, 2023. "Counting what counts: Moral considerations and market surplus," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-008/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Cheng-Li Huang & Ju-Lan Tsai, 2015. "Managerial Morality and Philanthropic Decision-Making: A Test of an Agency Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 795-811, December.
    13. Saad Azmat & Maryam Subhan, 2022. "Ethical Foundations of the Islamic Financial Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 567-580, October.
    14. George Gotsis & Zoe Kortezi, 2010. "Ethical Considerations in Organizational Politics: Expanding the Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 497-517, June.
    15. Vinnari, Markus & Tapio, Petri, 2012. "Sustainability of diets: From concepts to governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 46-54.
    16. Greaker, Mads & Stoknes, Per Espen & Alfsen, Knut H. & Ericson, Torgeir, 2013. "A Kantian approach to sustainable development indicators for climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 10-18.
    17. Chen, Ting-Hsuan & Liu, Shih-Ching & Wu, Chia-Hui, 2024. "The influence of CEO ethics on climate change policy from the perspective of utilitarianism and deontology," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Bessire, Dominique & Onnée, Stéphane, 2010. "Assessing corporate social performance: Strategies of legitimation and conflicting ideologies," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 445-467.
    19. Krummel, Daniel & Siegfried, Patrick, 2021. "Child Labour Ethics through the Prism of Utilitarianism and Deontology," MPRA Paper 111403, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-024-09679-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.