IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v29y2016i6d10.1007_s11213-016-9382-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Archetypal Structures in Urban Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Anab Kidwai

    (Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
    Symbiosis International University)

  • Anupam Saraph

    (Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research (SICSR))

Abstract

The paper demonstrates the use of systems archetypes as a practical method to understand the impact of urban policies and programs on urban dynamics. Systems archetypes are generic templates to represent the structural and behavioral insights in dynamic systems. They highlight counterintuitive behavior of social systems and the recursive nature of complex systems. This paper maps systems archetypes pertaining to the failures in urban programs, as described by Prof. J.W. Forrester in his classic book Urban Dynamics. ‘Fixes that backfire’ is a systems archetype that construes a situation where a fix effective in a short term creates long term behavioral side effects which might need even more fixes. This archetype is mapped onto the failures in urban programs. The insights to the reasons of failures of urban programs through the systems archetypes lens will enable us bring a change in the society and assist policy makers by being cautious of the unintended consequences while devising urban policies. Therefore, an approach has been proposed to deal with urban change by applying archetypal structures to urban problems. The approach illustrated in this paper will enable urban governors and planners, distinguish programs and policies that may or may not lead to desired dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Anab Kidwai & Anupam Saraph, 2016. "Use of Archetypal Structures in Urban Dynamics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 583-595, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:29:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-016-9382-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-016-9382-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-016-9382-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-016-9382-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay W. Forrester, 1968. "Industrial Dynamics--After the First Decade," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(7), pages 398-415, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Collins Ameyaw & Hans Wilhelm Alfen, 2018. "Two Strands Model of the Soft System Methodology Analysis of Private Sector Investment in Power Generation Sector in Ghana," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 395-419, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masechaba Nthunya & Nien-Tsu Tuan & Corrinne Shaw & Ian Jay, 2017. "A Systemic Exploration of Lesotho’s Basic Education through Interactive Management," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 257-276, June.
    2. Sahar AlMashaqbeh & Jose Eduardo Munive-Hernandez, 2023. "Risk Analysis under a Circular Economy Context Using a Systems Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Luis Camilo Ortigueira-Sánchez, 2017. "Influencing factors on citizen safety perception: systems and broken windows theories," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(1), pages 95-111, March.
    4. Dennis Gensch, 2001. "A Marketing-Decision-Support Model for Evaluating and Selecting Concepts for New Products," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3_supplem), pages 166-183, June.
    5. Gogi, Anastasia & Tako, Antuela A. & Robinson, Stewart, 2016. "An experimental investigation into the role of simulation models in generating insights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 931-944.
    6. Camilo Olaya, 2015. "Cows, agency, and the significance of operational thinking," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 183-219, October.
    7. Carlos M. Chang & Johanes Makahaube & Adeeba A. Raheem & Eric Smith & Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz, 2022. "Using System Dynamics Method to Measure Project Management Performance of Local Government Agencies," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Vazquez, Miguel & Hallack, Michelle, 2018. "The role of regulatory learning in energy transition: The case of solar PV in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 465-481.
    9. Lin, Junyi & Naim, Mohamed M. & Tang, Ou, 2024. "In-house or outsourcing? The impact of remanufacturing strategies on the dynamics of component remanufacturing systems under lifecycle demand and returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 965-979.
    10. David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas & David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas, 2015. "Health, Demographic Change and Well-Being: The European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme and System Dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 407-413, July.
    11. Li, Zhengdao & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Alshawi, Mustafa, 2014. "Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: An empirical study in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 27-39.
    12. Duan Lu & Asad Iqbal & Feixiang Zan & Xiaoming Liu & Guanghao Chen, 2021. "Life-Cycle-Based Greenhouse Gas, Energy, and Economic Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Management Using System Dynamics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Federico Barnabè & Maria Cleofe Giorgino & Martin Kunc, 2019. "Visualizing and managing value creation through integrated reporting practices: a dynamic resource-based perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 537-575, June.
    14. Nien-Tsu Tuan, 2022. "The Other Side of Success Factors—A Systemic Methodology for Exploring Critical Success Factors," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 441-452, June.
    15. Maier, Frank H., 1918-, 1998. "Consequences of technological strategies for competitiveness : lessons from statistical analysis and dynamic modeling," Working papers WP 4033-98., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    16. David Vaandrager & Lasse Gerrits & Nanny Bressers, 2015. "Reconstructing the Blue Connection: A Systemic Inquiry into the Improbable Project of Building a New River Through a (Sub)urban Area," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 689-706, November.
    17. Haurie, Alain, 1973. "La théorie des systèmes et l’analyse des dépenses publiques," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 49(1), pages 68-92, janvier.
    18. Fabricio Casarejos, 2020. "Casting Long-Term and Regenerative Perspectives on Global Sustainability through Systems and Resilience Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    19. V.L.M. Spiegler & A.T. Potter & M.M. Naim & D.R. Towill, 2016. "The value of nonlinear control theory in investigating the underlying dynamics and resilience of a grocery supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 265-286, January.
    20. Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette & Jac A. M. Vennix & Albert J. A. Felling, 2009. "On Evaluating the Performance of Problem Structuring Methods: An Attempt at Formulating a Conceptual Model," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 567-587, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:29:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-016-9382-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.