IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v63y2022i4d10.1007_s00362-021-01273-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing convexity of the generalised hazard function

Author

Listed:
  • Tommaso Lando

    (University of Bergamo
    VŠB-TU Ostrava)

Abstract

Let F, G be a pair of absolutely continuous cumulative distributions, where F is the distribution of interest and G is assumed to be known. The composition $$G^{-1}\circ F$$ G - 1 ∘ F , which is referred to as the generalised hazard function of F with respect to G, provides a flexible framework for statistical inference of F under shape restrictions, determined by G, which enables the generalisation of some well-known models, such as the increasing hazard rate family. This paper is concerned with the problem of testing the null hypothesis $${\mathscr {H}}_0$$ H 0 : “ $$G^{-1}\circ F$$ G - 1 ∘ F is convex”. The test statistic is based on the distance between the empirical distribution function and a corresponding isotonic estimator, which is denoted as the greatest relatively-convex minorant of the empirical distribution with respect to G. Under $${\mathscr {H}}_0$$ H 0 , this estimator converges uniformly to F, giving rise to a rather simple and general procedure for deriving families of consistent tests, without any support restriction. As an application, a goodness-of-fit test for the increasing hazard rate family is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommaso Lando, 2022. "Testing convexity of the generalised hazard function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1271-1289, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01273-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521864015 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. S. Kirmani & Ramesh Gupta, 2001. "On the Proportional Odds Model in Survival Analysis," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(2), pages 203-216, June.
    3. Saralees Nadarajah, 2009. "Bathtub-shaped failure rate functions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 855-863, September.
    4. Lando, Tommaso, 2021. "A test for the increasing log-odds rate family," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Robert Tenga & Thomas J. Santner, 1984. "Testing goodness of fit to the increasing failure rate family," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 617-630, December.
    6. Sahoo, Shyamsundar & Sengupta, Debasis, 2017. "Testing the hypothesis of increasing hazard ratio in two samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 119-129.
    7. Ruhul Ali Khan & Dhrubasish Bhattacharyya & Murari Mitra, 2021. "Exact and asymptotic tests of exponentiality against nonmonotonic mean time to failure type alternatives," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3015-3045, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lando, Tommaso, 2023. "Testing departures from the increasing hazard rate property," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lando, Tommaso, 2021. "A test for the increasing log-odds rate family," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Lando, Tommaso, 2023. "Testing departures from the increasing hazard rate property," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. N. Unnikrishnan Nair & S. M. Sunoj & Rajesh G., 2023. "Relation between Relative Hazard Rates and Residual Divergence with some Applications to Reliability Analysis," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 784-802, February.
    4. P. Sankaran & K. Jayakumar, 2008. "On proportional odds models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 779-789, October.
    5. Ramesh Gupta & Cheng Peng, 2014. "Proportional odds frailty model and stochastic comparisons," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(5), pages 897-912, October.
    6. S. Nadarajah & S. Bakar, 2013. "A new R package for actuarial survival models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 2139-2160, October.
    7. Walid B. H. Etman & Mohamed S. Eliwa & Hana N. Alqifari & Mahmoud El-Morshedy & Laila A. Al-Essa & Rashad M. EL-Sagheer, 2023. "The NBRULC Reliability Class: Mathematical Theory and Goodness-of-Fit Testing with Applications to Asymmetric Censored and Uncensored Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, June.
    8. David E. Giles, 2012. "A Note on Improved Estimation for the Topp-Leone Distribution," Econometrics Working Papers 1203, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    9. Saralees Nadarajah & Gauss Cordeiro & Edwin Ortega, 2013. "The exponentiated Weibull distribution: a survey," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 839-877, August.
    10. Lemonte, Artur J., 2013. "A new exponential-type distribution with constant, decreasing, increasing, upside-down bathtub and bathtub-shaped failure rate function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 149-170.
    11. Gokarna R. Aryal & Keshav P. Pokhrel & Netra Khanal & Chris P. Tsokos, 2019. "Reliability Models Using the Composite Generalizers of Weibull Distribution," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 807-829, December.
    12. Mansour Shrahili & Mohamed Kayid & Mhamed Mesfioui, 2023. "Relative Orderings of Modified Proportional Hazard Rate and Modified Proportional Reversed Hazard Rate Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-28, November.
    13. Leonardos Stefanos & Melolidakis Costis, 2020. "On the Equilibrium Uniqueness in Cournot Competition with Demand Uncertainty," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-6, June.
    14. Nanda, Asok K. & Das, Suchismita, 2012. "Stochastic orders of the Marshall–Olkin extended distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 295-302.
    15. Baker, Rose, 2019. "New survival distributions that quantify the gain from eliminating flawed components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 493-501.
    16. Ahmed Elshahhat & Mazen Nassar, 2021. "Bayesian survival analysis for adaptive Type-II progressive hybrid censored Hjorth data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1965-1990, September.
    17. Anis, M.Z. & Ghosh, Abhik, 2015. "Monte Carlo comparison of tests of exponentiality against NWBUE alternatives," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Jeong, Yujin & Park, Inchae & Yoon, Byungun, 2016. "Forecasting technology substitution based on hazard function," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 259-272.
    19. Trevor Fenner & Mark Levene & George Loizou, 2018. "A multiplicative process for generating the rank-order distribution of UK election results," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1069-1079, May.
    20. V. Zardasht & M. Asadi, 2010. "Evaluation of P(Xt>Yt ) when both Xt and Yt are residual lifetimes of two systems," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 64(4), pages 460-481, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01273-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.