IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v63y2022i4d10.1007_s00362-021-01273-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing convexity of the generalised hazard function

Author

Listed:
  • Tommaso Lando

    (University of Bergamo
    VŠB-TU Ostrava)

Abstract

Let F, G be a pair of absolutely continuous cumulative distributions, where F is the distribution of interest and G is assumed to be known. The composition $$G^{-1}\circ F$$ G - 1 ∘ F , which is referred to as the generalised hazard function of F with respect to G, provides a flexible framework for statistical inference of F under shape restrictions, determined by G, which enables the generalisation of some well-known models, such as the increasing hazard rate family. This paper is concerned with the problem of testing the null hypothesis $${\mathscr {H}}_0$$ H 0 : “ $$G^{-1}\circ F$$ G - 1 ∘ F is convex”. The test statistic is based on the distance between the empirical distribution function and a corresponding isotonic estimator, which is denoted as the greatest relatively-convex minorant of the empirical distribution with respect to G. Under $${\mathscr {H}}_0$$ H 0 , this estimator converges uniformly to F, giving rise to a rather simple and general procedure for deriving families of consistent tests, without any support restriction. As an application, a goodness-of-fit test for the increasing hazard rate family is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommaso Lando, 2022. "Testing convexity of the generalised hazard function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1271-1289, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01273-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Kirmani & Ramesh Gupta, 2001. "On the Proportional Odds Model in Survival Analysis," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(2), pages 203-216, June.
    2. Saralees Nadarajah, 2009. "Bathtub-shaped failure rate functions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 855-863, September.
    3. Groeneboom,Piet & Jongbloed,Geurt, 2014. "Nonparametric Estimation under Shape Constraints," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521864015, September.
    4. Lando, Tommaso, 2021. "A test for the increasing log-odds rate family," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Robert Tenga & Thomas J. Santner, 1984. "Testing goodness of fit to the increasing failure rate family," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 617-630, December.
    6. Sahoo, Shyamsundar & Sengupta, Debasis, 2017. "Testing the hypothesis of increasing hazard ratio in two samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 119-129.
    7. Ruhul Ali Khan & Dhrubasish Bhattacharyya & Murari Mitra, 2021. "Exact and asymptotic tests of exponentiality against nonmonotonic mean time to failure type alternatives," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3015-3045, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lando, Tommaso, 2023. "Testing departures from the increasing hazard rate property," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lando, Tommaso, 2021. "A test for the increasing log-odds rate family," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Lando, Tommaso, 2023. "Testing departures from the increasing hazard rate property," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. N. Unnikrishnan Nair & S. M. Sunoj & Rajesh G., 2023. "Relation between Relative Hazard Rates and Residual Divergence with some Applications to Reliability Analysis," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 784-802, February.
    4. Mao, Lu, 2022. "Identification of the outcome distribution and sensitivity analysis under weak confounder–instrument interaction," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Ruixuan Liu & Zhengfei Yu, 2019. "Simple Semiparametric Estimation of Ordered Response Models: with an Application to the Interdependence Duration Models," Tsukuba Economics Working Papers 2019-004, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
    6. Yoici Arai & Taisuke Otsu & Mengshan Xu, 2022. "GLS under monotone heteroskedasticity," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 625, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    7. Babii, Andrii & Kumar, Rohit, 2023. "Isotonic regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 371-393.
    8. Piet Groeneboom, 2021. "Estimation of the incubation time distribution for COVID‐19," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 75(2), pages 161-179, May.
    9. P. Sankaran & K. Jayakumar, 2008. "On proportional odds models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 779-789, October.
    10. Elina Robeva & Bernd Sturmfels & Ngoc Tran & Caroline Uhler, 2021. "Maximum likelihood estimation for totally positive log‐concave densities," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(3), pages 817-844, September.
    11. Hendrik P. Lopuhaä & Eni Musta, 2017. "Smooth estimation of a monotone hazard and a monotone density under random censoring," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(1), pages 58-82, January.
    12. Xu, Mengshan & Otsu, Taisuke, 2020. "Score estimation of monotone partially linear index model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106698, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. José E. Chacón, 2020. "The Modal Age of Statistics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 122-141, April.
    14. Giguelay, J. & Huet, S., 2018. "Testing k-monotonicity of a discrete distribution. Application to the estimation of the number of classes in a population," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 96-115.
    15. Taisuke Otsu & Mengshan Xu, 2019. "Score estimation of monotone partially linear index model," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 603, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    16. Xi Chen & Victor Chernozhukov & Iv'an Fern'andez-Val & Scott Kostyshak & Ye Luo, 2018. "Shape-Enforcing Operators for Point and Interval Estimators," Papers 1809.01038, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    17. Marco Capaldo & Antonio Di Crescenzo & Alessandra Meoli, 2024. "Cumulative information generating function and generalized Gini functions," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 87(7), pages 775-803, October.
    18. Sungwook Kim & Michael P. Fay & Michael A. Proschan, 2021. "Valid and approximately valid confidence intervals for current status data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(3), pages 438-452, July.
    19. Quan Li & Xin Wang & Shuaiang Rong, 2018. "Probabilistic Load Flow Method Based on Modified Latin Hypercube-Important Sampling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Lu Mao & Dan-Yu Lin & Donglin Zeng, 2017. "Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 857-865, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:63:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-021-01273-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.