IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sorede/v33y2022i5d10.1134_s1075700722050033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecast of the Long-Term Trajectory of the Potential GDP of Kazakhstan in the Context of the Global Energy Transition

Author

Listed:
  • S. N. Alpysbaeva

    (Economic Research Institute)

  • Sh. Zh. Shuneev

    (Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms, Republic of Kazakhstan)

  • A. A. Bakdolotov

    (Economic Research Institute)

  • K. S. Beisengazin

    (Economic Research Institute)

  • E. I. Tautenov

    (Economic Research Institute)

  • N. N. Zhanakova

    (Economic Research Institute)

Abstract

— The article presents a forecast of the potential GDP of Kazakhstan performed using a structural method based on a production function that establishes relationships between the factors of production, total factor productivity, and output. Forecast estimations of trends of the key factors of production and the total factor productivity that form the long-term trend of the potential GDP of the country in the context of the global energy transition are presented. The baseline scenario of a long-term forecast of the potential GDP of Kazakhstan for the period until 2050 as adjusted for the objective of decarbonization of the economy is developed. Approaches to economic policy that could “nudge” the potential GDP up are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • S. N. Alpysbaeva & Sh. Zh. Shuneev & A. A. Bakdolotov & K. S. Beisengazin & E. I. Tautenov & N. N. Zhanakova, 2022. "Forecast of the Long-Term Trajectory of the Potential GDP of Kazakhstan in the Context of the Global Energy Transition," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 561-570, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:33:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1134_s1075700722050033
    DOI: 10.1134/S1075700722050033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1075700722050033
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S1075700722050033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. N. Porfiriev, 2019. "The Low-Carbon Development Paradigm and Climate Change Risk Reduction Strategy for the Economy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 111-118, March.
    2. Бессонов В. А., 2004. "О Динамике Совокупной Факторной Производительности В Российской Переходной Экономике," Higher School of Economics Economic Journal Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(4), pages 542-587.
    3. Jan van Heerden & Reyer Gerlagh & James Blignaut & Mark Horridge & Sebastiaan Hess & Ramos Mabugu & Margaret Mabugu, 2006. "Searching for Triple Dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 Pollution and Poverty while Promoting Growth," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 113-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Igor A. Yakovlev & Lyudmila S. Kabir & Svetlana I. Nikulina, 2020. "Climate Policy of the Russian Federation: International Cooperation and National Approach," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 26-36, August.
    2. Julien Lefevre, 2018. "Modeling the Socioeconomic Impacts of the Adoption of a Carbon Pricing Instrument – Literature review," CIRED Working Papers hal-03128619, HAL.
    3. Andrei Polbin & Sergey Drobyshevsky, 2014. "Developing a Dynamic Stochastic Model of General Equilibrium for the Russian Economy," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 166P, pages 156-156.
    4. Nils Ohlendorf & Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Minx & Carsten Schröder & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2021. "Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A Meta-Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 1-42, January.
    5. William Wills & Emilio Lebre La Rovere & Carolina Grottera & Giovanna Ferrazzo Naspolini & Gaëlle Le Treut & F. Ghersi & Julien Lefèvre & Carolina Burle Schmidt Dubeux, 2022. "Economic and social effectiveness of carbon pricing schemes to meet Brazilian NDC targets," Post-Print hal-03500923, HAL.
    6. Sinelnikov-Murylev, Sergei (Синельников-Мурылев, Сергей) & Drobyshevskiy, Sergei (Дробышевский, Сергей) & Kazakova, Maria (Казакова, Мария), 2014. "Decomposition of the russian GDP growth rate in 1999-2014 [Декомпозиция Темпов Роста Ввп России В 1999—2014 Годах]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 7-37, October.
    7. Masaaki Kuboniwa, 2011. "The Russian growth path and TFP changes in light of estimation of the production function using quarterly data," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 311-325.
    8. Harald Fadinger & Pablo Fleiss, 2011. "Trade and Sectoral Productivity," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(555), pages 958-989, September.
    9. Ziesmer, Johannes & Jin, Ding & Mukashov, Askar & Henning, Christian, 2023. "Integrating fundamental model uncertainty in policy analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    10. Tol, Richard S.J., 2017. "The structure of the climate debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 431-438.
    11. Okonkwo, Jennifer Uju, 2021. "Welfare effects of carbon taxation on South African households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Alton, Theresa & Arndt, Channing & Davies, Rob & Hartley, Faaiqa & Makrelov, Konstantin & Thurlow, James & Ubogu, Dumebi, 2014. "Introducing carbon taxes in South Africa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 344-354.
    13. World Bank, 2011. "South Africa Economic Update, November 2011," World Bank Publications - Reports 26854, The World Bank Group.
    14. Domguia, Edmond Noubissi & Ngounou, Borice Augustin & Pondie, Thierry Messie & Bitoto, Fabrice Ewolo, 2024. "Environmental tax and energy poverty: An economic approach for an environmental and social solution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    15. Deng, Youyi & Dong, Kangyin & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Xue, Jinjun, 2023. "How does environmental regulation affect the double dividend for energy firms? Evidence from China’s EPT policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 807-820.
    16. Mukashov, Askar & Jin, Ding & Henning, Christian & Hedtrich, Johannes, 2019. "Estimation of Growth Elasticities in the General Equilibrium Framework under Model Uncertainty," Conference papers 333081, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang & Atsagli, Philip, 2017. "Carbon taxes, industrial production, welfare and the environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 305-313.
    18. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Go, Delfin S. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2009. "Tax policy to reduce carbon emissions in south Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4933, The World Bank.
    19. Ramos Mabugu & Margaret Chitiga, 2007. "Poverty and Inequality Effects of a High Growth Scenario in South Africa: A Dynamic Microsimulation CGE Analysis," Working Papers 200716, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    20. Maruf Rahman Maxim & Kerstin K. Zander, 2020. "Green Tax Reform in Australia in the Presence of Improved Environment-Induced Productivity Gain: Does It Offer Sustainable Recovery from a Post-COVID-19 Recession?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:33:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1134_s1075700722050033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.