IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v177y2025i2d10.1007_s11205-025-03540-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender-Specific Analysis of Self-Reported Health and Educational Mismatch: Evidence from Employees in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Silvana Robone

    (University of Eastern Piedmont
    HEDG - Health, University of York
    Bocconi University
    Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano)

Abstract

Our paper investigates the influence of vertical educational mismatch—overeducation and undereducation—on selected EQ-5D metrics, namely pain and anxiety/depression. We conduct a gender-specific analysis and estimate ordered probit models for our categorical dependent variables by using a sample of currently working employees from the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey. Since our health outcomes are self-reported, we challenge the validity of the results obtained by using the ordered probit model and enrich the analysis by correcting our estimates for the presence of reporting heterogeneity bias. To do that, we merge the RLMS-HSE (2005) with externally collected anchoring vignettes for Russia from the World Health Survey (2003) and estimate a hierarchical ordered probit (HOPIT) model. The HOPIT estimates show that in several cases, educational mismatch affects the reporting style of respondents. Our findings provide evidence that, after adjusting for reporting heterogeneity, undereducation has a negative influence on the physical component of health (proxied by pain) for women, while overeducation affects the psychological component of health (proxied by anxiety/depression) in both gender groups. Overeducated women appear to have better psychological health, while overeducated men have worse psychological health than their matched counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvana Robone, 2025. "Gender-Specific Analysis of Self-Reported Health and Educational Mismatch: Evidence from Employees in Russia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 763-786, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:177:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03540-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03540-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03540-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-025-03540-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Educational mismatch; Overeducation; Undereducation; EQ-5D; RLMS-HSE; World health survey; Reporting heterogeneity bias; Anchoring vignettes; HOPIT model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I26 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Returns to Education
    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J80 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - General
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:177:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03540-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.