IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v175y2024i2d10.1007_s11205-024-03385-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective–Objective Method of Maximizing the Average Variance Extracted From Sub-indicators in Composite Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Matheus Pereira Libório

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)

  • Alexandre Magno Alvez Diniz

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)

  • Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira

    (Federal Technological Education Centre of Minas Gerais)

  • Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)

Abstract

This research presents an innovative method for constructing composite indicators: the Subjective–objective method of maximizing extracted variance (Sommev). Sommev’s hybrid weighting approach fills an important gap within a highly controversial area of the composite indicators’ literature, which criticizes the statistical assignment of weights disconnected from theory and the errors and judgmental biases inherent in the expert opinion-based weighting approach. These innovations contribute to a more coherent and consistent operationalization of the theoretical framework of multidimensional phenomena, reconciling the non-compensability between sub-indicators and the maximum retention of original information through statistically defined weights, in which the expert’s opinion is considered, but does not determine the sub-indicator’s weights. Twenty simulations were carried out to analyze the application of the method in representing social exclusion in a Brazilian city. Composite indicators constructed by Sommev retain twice as much information as those constructed with equal weights or weights defined by experts. This increased informational capacity favors a more comprehensive representation of the multidimensional phenomenon, having a high potential for application in solving problems of a multidimensional nature in the social, economic, and environmental areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheus Pereira Libório & Alexandre Magno Alvez Diniz & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel, 2024. "Subjective–Objective Method of Maximizing the Average Variance Extracted From Sub-indicators in Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 613-637, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:175:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03385-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-024-03385-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-024-03385-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-024-03385-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sehnbruch, Kirsten & González, Pablo & Apablaza, Mauricio & Méndez, Rocío & Arriagada, Verónica, 2020. "The Quality of Employment (QoE) in nine Latin American countries: A multidimensional perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Rong Chen & Yuanyuan Ji & Guolin Jiang & Han Xiao & Ruoqing Xie & Pingfang Zhu, 2022. "Composite Index Construction with Expert Opinion," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 67-79, December.
    3. Fusco, Elisa & Maggi, Bernardo & Rizzuto, Livia, 2022. "Alternative indicators for the evaluation of renewables in Europe: An efficiency approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 48-65.
    4. Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório, 2023. "Goal-based participatory weighting scheme: balancing objectivity and subjectivity in the construction of composite indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4387-4407, October.
    5. Marta Kuc-Czarnecka & Samuele Lo Piano & Andrea Saltelli, 2020. "Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 775-802, June.
    6. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    7. Giuseppe Munda, 2012. "Choosing Aggregation Rules for Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 337-354, December.
    8. P. Zhou & B. Ang & D. Zhou, 2010. "Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: a Multiplicative Optimization Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 169-181, March.
    9. Raffaele Mattera & Michelangelo Misuraca & Maria Spano & Germana Scepi, 2023. "Mixed frequency composite indicators for measuring public sentiment in the EU," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2357-2382, June.
    10. Matheus Pereira Libório & João Francisco Abreu & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Alexei Manso Correa Machado, 2023. "Effect of sub-indicator weighting schemes on the spatial dependence of multidimensional phenomena," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 185-211, April.
    11. Francesco Vidoli & Elisa Fusco & Claudio Mazziotta, 2015. "Non-compensability in Composite Indicators: A Robust Directional Frontier Method," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 635-652, July.
    12. Daniele Trogu & Michele Campagna, 2018. "Towards Spatial Composite Indicators: A Case Study on Sardinian Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Francesco Devicienti & Ambra Poggi, 2011. "Poverty and social exclusion: two sides of the same coin or dynamically interrelated processes?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(25), pages 3549-3571.
    14. Ruiz, Francisco & El Gibari, Samira & Cabello, José M. & Gómez, Trinidad, 2020. "MRP-WSCI: Multiple reference point based weak and strong composite indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Fusco, Elisa & Vidoli, Francesco & Rogge, Nicky, 2020. "Spatial directional robust Benefit of the Doubt approach in presence of undesirable output: An application to Italian waste sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Giuseppe Munda, 2012. "Intensity of preference and related uncertainty in non-compensatory aggregation rules," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 649-669, October.
    17. Fusco, Elisa & Vidoli, Francesco & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2018. "Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-14.
    18. Annalina Sarra & Eugenia Nissi, 2020. "A Spatial Composite Indicator for Human and Ecosystem Well-Being in the Italian Urban Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 353-377, April.
    19. Matteo Mazziotta & Adriano Pareto, 2019. "Use and Misuse of PCA for Measuring Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 451-476, April.
    20. Milica Maricic & Jose A. Egea & Veljko Jeremic, 2019. "A Hybrid Enhanced Scatter Search—Composite I-Distance Indicator (eSS-CIDI) Optimization Approach for Determining Weights Within Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 497-537, July.
    21. Ana Garcia-Bernabeu & Adolfo Hilario-Caballero, 2021. "Monitoring multidimensional phenomena with a multicriteria composite performance interval approach," Papers 2107.08393, arXiv.org.
    22. Marko Kallio & Joseph H. A. Guillaume & Matti Kummu & Kirsi Virrantaus, 2018. "Spatial Variation in Seasonal Water Poverty Index for Laos: An Application of Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 1131-1157, December.
    23. Miguel Laparra & Nerea Zugasti Mutilva & Ignacio García Lautre, 2021. "The Multidimensional Conception of Social Exclusion and the Aggregation Dilemma: A Solution Proposal Based on Multiple Correspondence Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 637-666, December.
    24. Koen Decancq & María Ana Lugo, 2013. "Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 7-34, January.
    25. Andrea Saltelli, 2007. "Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 65-77, March.
    26. Korhonen, Pekka J., 1984. "Subjective principal component analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 243-255, November.
    27. Figueira, José Rui & Oliveira, Henrique M. & Serro, Ana Paula & Colaço, Rogério & Froes, Filipe & Robalo Cordeiro, Carlos & Diniz, António & Guimarães, Miguel, 2023. "A multiple criteria approach for building a pandemic impact assessment composite indicator: The case of COVID-19 in Portugal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 795-818.
    28. Alfredo Cartone & Paolo Postiglione, 2021. "Principal component analysis for geographical data: the role of spatial effects in the definition of composite indicators," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 126-147, April.
    29. Patrícia Bernardes & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Sérgio Fernando Loureiro Rezende & Joel Gomes Pereira Júnior & Angélica Cidália Gouveia Santos & Maurício Andrade Rodrigues Costa & Rafael Lopes Carvalhai, 2022. "Cost of doing business index in Latin America," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2233-2252, August.
    30. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    31. Greta L Polites & Nicholas Roberts & Jason Thatcher, 2012. "Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: a review and guidelines for their use," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 22-48, January.
    32. Church, A. & Frost, M. & Sullivan, K., 2000. "Transport and social exclusion in London," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 195-205, July.
    33. Giuseppe Munda & Michela Nardo, 2009. "Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(12), pages 1513-1523.
    34. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Camanho, Ana Santos & Figueira, José Rui & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Incorporating preference information in a range directional composite indicator: The case of Portuguese public hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 633-650.
    35. Samira El Gibari & Trinidad Gómez & Francisco Ruiz, 2019. "Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: a review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 1-24, February.
    36. Lívia Maria Leite Silva & Petr Ekel & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira & Matheus Pereira Libório & Marcos Flávio Silveira Vasconcelos D’angelo, 2023. "Spatial Decision-Making under Uncertainties for Supporting the Prospection of Sites for Hybrid Renewable Energy Generation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-29, June.
    37. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2023. "Gauging energy poverty in developing countries with a composite metric of electricity access," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    38. Kris Boudt & Marco d’Errico & Hong Anh Luu & Rebecca Pietrelli & Muhammad Ahsan, 2022. "Interpretability of Composite Indicators Based on Principal Components," Journal of Probability and Statistics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-12, September.
    39. P. Zhou & B. Ang, 2009. "Comparing MCDA Aggregation Methods in Constructing Composite Indicators Using the Shannon-Spearman Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 83-96, October.
    40. Sinéad Keogh & Stephen O’Neill & Kieran Walsh, 2021. "Composite Measures for Assessing Multidimensional Social Exclusion in Later Life: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 389-410, June.
    41. Elena Stefana & Filippo Marciano & Diana Rossi & Paola Cocca & Giuseppe Tomasoni, 2021. "Composite Indicators to Measure Quality of Working Life in Europe: A Systematic Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 1047-1078, October.
    42. Katarzyna A. Kurek & Wim Heijman & Johan Ophem & Stanisław Gędek & Jacek Strojny, 2022. "Measuring local competitiveness: comparing and integrating two methods PCA and AHP," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1371-1389, June.
    43. Fusco, Elisa, 2015. "Enhancing non-compensatory composite indicators: A directional proposal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 620-630.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matheus Pereira Libório & Alexandre Magno Alvez Diniz & Angélica Cidália Gouveia Santos & Cristiane Neri Nobre & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira & Hasheem Mannan & Marcos Flávio Silveira Vasconcelos Da, 2024. "Benefit-of-the-Doubt in the Spatial Analysis of Child Well-Being in European Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(4), pages 1851-1870, August.
    2. Cantone, Giulio Giacomo & Tomaselli, Venera, 2024. "On the Coherence of Composite Indexes: Multiversal Model and Specification Analysis for an Index of Well-Being," MetaArXiv d5y26, Center for Open Science.
    3. Matheus Pereira Libório & João Francisco Abreu & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Alexei Manso Correa Machado, 2023. "Effect of sub-indicator weighting schemes on the spatial dependence of multidimensional phenomena," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 185-211, April.
    4. Matheus Pereira Libório & Elisa Fusco & Alexandre Magno Alves Diniz & Oséias da Silva Martinuci & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel, 2024. "A Novel Approach for Multispatial and Multitemporal Analysis of Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 783-800, July.
    5. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    6. Fusco, Elisa, 2023. "Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Tianjiao Wang & Yelin Fu, 2020. "Constructing Composite Indicators with Individual Judgements and Best–Worst Method: An Illustration of Value Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Milica Maricic & Jose A. Egea & Veljko Jeremic, 2019. "A Hybrid Enhanced Scatter Search—Composite I-Distance Indicator (eSS-CIDI) Optimization Approach for Determining Weights Within Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 497-537, July.
    9. Annalina Sarra & Eugenia Nissi, 2020. "A Spatial Composite Indicator for Human and Ecosystem Well-Being in the Italian Urban Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 353-377, April.
    10. Panagiotis Artelaris, 2022. "A development index for the Greek regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1261-1281, June.
    11. Vidoli, F. & Fusco, E. & Pignataro, G. & Guccio, C., 2024. "Multi-directional Robust Benefit of the Doubt model: An application to the measurement of the quality of acute care services in OECD countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório, 2023. "Goal-based participatory weighting scheme: balancing objectivity and subjectivity in the construction of composite indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4387-4407, October.
    13. Vidoli, F.; & Fusco, E.; & Pignataro, G.; & Guccio, C.;, 2023. "Multi-directional Robust Benefit of the Doubt model: a comprehensive measure for the quality of health care in OECD countries," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/14, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    14. Matheus Pereira Libório & Alexandre Magno Alves Diniz & Hamidreza Rabiei-Dastjerd & Oseias da Silva Martinuci & Carlos Augusto Paiva da Silva Martins & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel, 2023. "A Decision Framework for Identifying Methods to Construct Stable Composite Indicators That Capture the Concept of Multidimensional Social Phenomena: The Case of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Khatab Alqararah, 2023. "Assessing the robustness of composite indicators: the case of the Global Innovation Index," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Lola Martin-Moro & Meltem Öztürk & Florence Laufer, 2022. "Modelling the Prison Life Index with Value Focused Thinking Methodology," Working Papers hal-03851980, HAL.
    17. Giuliano Resce & Fritz Schiltz, 2021. "Sustainable Development in Europe: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 509-529, June.
    18. Lola Martin-Moro & Meltem Öztürk & Florence Laufer, 2024. "Structuring the Prison Life Index through Value Focused Thinking Methodology," Post-Print hal-04767405, HAL.
    19. de Castro-Pardo, Mónica & Cabello, José Manuel & Martín, José María & Ruiz, Francisco, 2023. "A multi reference point based index to assess and monitor European water policies from a sustainability approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    20. Ruiz, Francisco & El Gibari, Samira & Cabello, José M. & Gómez, Trinidad, 2020. "MRP-WSCI: Multiple reference point based weak and strong composite indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:175:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03385-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.