IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v174y2024i1d10.1007_s11205-024-03395-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Human Development Indicators and Technology Spillover with Environmental Quality: Evidence from Panel ARDL Model for D8 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Abolfazl Shahabadi

    (Alzahra University)

  • Maryam Heidarian

    (Alzahra University)

Abstract

Developing countries exhibit unfavorable environmental conditions due to suboptimal technology utilization, low productivity, lower per capita income, and other factors that intensify environmental pressures. This situation underscores the significance of investigating the impacts of technology spillovers on environmental quality. In recent years, substantial attention has been devoted to assessing environmental quality and sustainability at national and international levels. Governments worldwide have recognized that environmental performance cannot be viewed solely through economic development; it must encompass other facets of development, particularly social development. Given that the Human Development Index (HDI) can concurrently gauge social and economic progress, this study aims to assess the influence of HDI components (life expectancy at birth, mean years of schooling, and gross national income) as well as technology spillover (resulting from the import of knowledge carriers) on environmental quality in D-8 countries during the period from 2003 to 2022, utilizing the autoregressive distributed lag method. The findings reveal a U-shaped relationship between HDI variables and long-term environmental quality. Furthermore, technology spillovers foster increased knowledge, the development of competitive advantages, and economic integration. The results also highlight a significant negative long-term relationship between technology spillover and environmental quality. Consequently, policymakers in D-8 countries are encouraged to establish a framework conducive to introducing and localizing eco-friendly technologies through adopting macroeconomic policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Abolfazl Shahabadi & Maryam Heidarian, 2024. "The Relationship Between Human Development Indicators and Technology Spillover with Environmental Quality: Evidence from Panel ARDL Model for D8 Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 421-444, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:174:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03395-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-024-03395-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-024-03395-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-024-03395-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costantini, Valeria & Monni, Salvatore, 2008. "Environment, human development and economic growth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 867-880, February.
    2. Lori M. Hunter & Alison Hatch & Aaron Johnson, 2004. "Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(3), pages 677-694, September.
    3. Ahakwa, Isaac & Xu, Yi & Tackie, Evelyn Agba, 2023. "Greening human capital towards environmental quality in Ghana: Insight from the novel dynamic ARDL simulation approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Mrabet, Zouhair & Alsamara, Mouyad & Mimouni, Karim & Mnasri, Ayman, 2021. "Can human development and political stability improve environmental quality? New evidence from the MENA region," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 28-44.
    5. Destek, Mehmet & Sinha, Avik, 2020. "Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries," MPRA Paper 104246, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    6. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    7. Alam, Shaista & Fatima, Ambreen & Butt, Muhammad S., 2007. "Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradation," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 825-837, October.
    8. Chun-Lei Yang, 1998. "Rent Seeking, Technology Commitment, and Economic Development," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 154(4), pages 640-640, December.
    9. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Debashis Chakraborty, 2009. "Environment, human development and economic growth: a contemporary analysis of Indian states," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1/2), pages 20-49.
    10. Jones, Donald W., 1991. "How urbanization affects energy-use in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(7), pages 621-630, September.
    11. Bruno Crepon & Emmanuel Duguet & Jacques Mairesse, 1998. "Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 115-158.
    12. James Boyce, 2003. "Inequality and Environmental Protection," Working Papers wp52, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    13. F. M. Scherer, 2005. "Edwin Mansfield: An Appreciation," Springer Books, in: Albert N. Link & F. M. Scherer (ed.), Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield, pages 1-7, Springer.
    14. F.M. Scherer, 2005. "Edwin Mansfield: An Appreciation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 30(2_2), pages 3-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacques Mairesse & Pierre Mohnen, 2005. "The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment Using French Survey Data," Springer Books, in: Albert N. Link & F. M. Scherer (ed.), Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield, pages 129-143, Springer.
    2. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Debashis Chakraborty, 2007. "Environment, Human Development and Economic Growth after Liberalisation: An Analysis of Indian States," Working Papers 2007-016, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    3. Li, Ke & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: Does the level of development matter?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1107-1122.
    4. Mbiankeu Nguea, Stéphane & Hervé Kaffo Fotio,, 2024. "Synthesizing the role of biomass energy consumption and human development in achieving environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    5. Xu, Deyi & Sheraz, Muhammad & Hassan, Arshad & Sinha, Avik & Ullah, Saif, 2022. "Financial development, renewable energy and CO2 emission in G7 countries: New evidence from non-linear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Shibing You & Bi Wu & Ping Shen, 2015. "Government factors that influence the relevance between environmental and economic growth," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 228(1), pages 35-45, May.
    7. Özlem Karadağ Albayrak & Samet Topal & Serhat Çamkaya, 2022. "The Impact of Economic Growth, Renewable Energy, Non-renewable Energy and Trade Openness on the Ecological Footprint and Forecasting in Turkiye: an Case of the ARDL and NMGM Forecasting Model," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 10(2), pages 139-154, December.
    8. Farhani, Sahbi & Mrizak, Sana & Chaibi, Anissa & Rault, Christophe, 2014. "The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: A panel data analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 189-198.
    9. Vainio, Annukka & Paloniemi, Riikka, 2014. "The complex role of attitudes toward science in pro-environmental consumption in the Nordic countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 18-27.
    10. Arminen, Heli & Menegaki, Angeliki N., 2019. "Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 621-634.
    11. Valeria Costantini & Chiara Martini, 2010. "A Modified Environmental Kuznets Curve for sustainable development assessment using panel data," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1/2), pages 84-122.
    12. Debashis Chakraborty & Sacchidananda Mukherjee, 2013. "Fiscal Subsidies and Environmental Sustainability: What does the Cross-country Empirical Estimates Suggest?," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 383-397, August.
    13. Qiao, Hui & Chen, Siyu & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin, 2019. "Has China's coal consumption actually reached its peak? National and regional analysis considering cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Abdelaziz Boukhelkhal, 2022. "Energy use, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Africa: does the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis exist? New evidence from heterogeneous panel under cross-sectional dependence," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13083-13110, November.
    15. Lotfi Mekhzoumi & Nadjoua Harnane & Abdellah Ayachi & Okba Abdellaoui, 2022. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Industrialized Countries: A Second Generation Econometric Approach," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 96-103, March.
    16. Hossain, Md. Emran & Islam, Md. Sayemul & Bandyopadhyay, Arunava & Awan, Ashar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Rej, Soumen, 2022. "Mexico at the crossroads of natural resource dependence and COP26 pledge: Does technological innovation help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Xu, Pei & Hussain, Muzzammil & Ye, Chengang & Wang, Jiangquan & Wang, Chen & Geng, Jinzhou & Liu, Yiding & Chen, Jingwei, 2022. "Natural resources, economic policies, energy structure, and ecological footprints’ nexus in emerging seven countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Sofien Tiba & Fateh Belaid, 2021. "Modeling The Nexus Between Sustainable Development And Renewable Energy: The African Perspectives," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 307-329, February.
    19. Marc Audi & Marc Poulin & Amjad Ali, 2024. "Environmental Impact of Business Freedom and Renewable Energy: A Global Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 672-683, May.
    20. Muhammad, Anees & Ishfaq, Ahmed, 2011. "Industrial development, agricultural growth, urbanization and environmental Kuznets curve in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 33469, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Human development; Technological spillover; Environmental quality; Good governance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:174:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03395-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.