IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v124y2015i1p67-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Poverty Risk in Districts of the Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Anton Michálek
  • Zuzana Veselovská

Abstract

Poverty in Eastern European countries and the problems that accompany the social malady have become widely discussed topics. We chose Slovakia as an example of aggregated indicator using, but the criteria can also be applied to other countries. The aim of the article is to point to the distinct spatial concentration of poverty in Slovakia, to capture its differentiated level (depth) conditions, and to identify its main traits and carriers. Another aim is to use of an aggregated indicator. An aggregated indicator, a comparatively new method applied by the Eurostat was used for identification of poverty. Data collected by the Regional Database of the Statistical Office of the SR and of the Centre of Labour, Social Matters and Family (UPSVaR) were used in this study. The obtained results showed that poverty is a serious problem for one-third (24) of all Slovak districts, its level and depth are differentiated and it is clearly concentrated in the eastern and southern parts of the country (these territories comprise the six poorest districts of Slovakia). The accumulated statistics also unveiled the conditions, status, and socio-economic situation of poor districts. It was found that poor districts have many common traits and properties which make it possible to identify the characteristics and carriers of poverty in Slovakia. Identification of poor districts and establishment of the level of poverty yield important information in the search for solutions, compilation of programmes, and measures of social and regional policies, which when implemented, would prevent further increase of poverty in affected regions. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Anton Michálek & Zuzana Veselovská, 2015. "Poverty Risk in Districts of the Slovak Republic," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 67-83, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:124:y:2015:i:1:p:67-83
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0785-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-014-0785-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-014-0785-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Crettaz, 2011. "Fighting Working Poverty in Post-industrial Economies," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14491.
    2. Udaya Wagle, 2008. "Multidimensional Poverty Measurement," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, Springer, number 978-0-387-75875-6, July.
    3. Ravallion, Martin & Sen, Binayak, 1996. "When Method Matters: Monitoring Poverty in Bangladesh," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(4), pages 761-792, July.
    4. Hans-Jürgen Andreß & Henning Lohmann (ed.), 2008. "The Working Poor in Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13060.
    5. Lorenzo Cappellari, 2002. "Do the `working poor' stay poor? An analysis of low pay transitions in Italy," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 64(2), pages 87-110, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filandri, Marianna & Struffolino, Emanuela, 2018. "Lavoratori o lavoratrici povere? Disuguaglianze di genere nel mercato del lavoro in Europa," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue 117, pages 67-85.
    2. Joachim Merz & Tim Rathjen, 2014. "Multidimensional time and income poverty: well-being gap and minimum 2DGAP poverty intensity – German evidence," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(4), pages 555-580, December.
    3. repec:aia:ginidp:dp51 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jeroen Horemans & Ive Marx, 2013. "In-work poverty in times of crisis: do part-timers fare worse?," ImPRovE Working Papers 13/14, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    5. Ive Marx & Brian Nolan & Javier Olivera, 2014. "The Welfare State and Anti-Poverty Policy in Rich Countries," Working Papers 1403, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    6. Jinghong Liu, 2019. "What Does In-Work Poverty Mean for Women: Comparing the Gender Employment Segregation in Belgium and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Udaya R. Wagle, 2008. "How Have the Poor in South Asia Fared between 1980 and 2004? An Assessment of Living Conditions," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 9(2), pages 261-292, September.
    8. Horemans, Jeroen & Marx, Ive, 2017. "Poverty and Material Deprivation among the Self-Employed in Europe: An Exploration of a Relatively Uncharted Landscape," IZA Discussion Papers 11007, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Ive Marx & Sarah Marchal & Brian Nolan, 2012. "GINI DP 56: Mind the Gap: Net Incomes of Minimum Wage Workers in the EU and the US," GINI Discussion Papers 56, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    10. Kelvin Chi-Kin Cheung & Wai-Sum Chan & Kee-Lee Chou, 2019. "Material Deprivation and Working Poor in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 39-66, August.
    11. Ive Marx & Brian Nolan, 2012. "GINI DP 51: In-Work Poverty," GINI Discussion Papers 51, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    12. Wim Van Lancker & Jeroen Horemans, 2017. "Into the Great Wide Unknown: Untangling the Relationship between Childcare Service Use and In-Work Poverty," Working Papers 1704, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    13. Marx, Ive & Marchal, Sarah & Nolan, Brian, 2012. "Mind the Gap: Net Incomes of Minimum Wage Workers in the EU and the US," IZA Discussion Papers 6510, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Sang-Yong Sim, 2018. "A Comparative Study of the Institutional Factors Influencing Working Poverty: Focusing on Two-parent Households in Developed OECD Countries," LIS Working papers 676, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    15. Richard ANKER, 2006. "Poverty lines around the world: A new methodology and internationally comparable estimates," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 145(4), pages 279-307, December.
    16. Emily Schmidt & Rachel Gilbert & Brian Holtemeyer & Kristi Mahrt, 2021. "Poverty analysis in the lowlands of Papua New Guinea underscores climate vulnerability and need for income flexibility," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(1), pages 171-191, January.
    17. Ravallion, Martin & Lokshin, Michael, 2003. "On the utility consistency of poverty lines," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3157, The World Bank.
    18. World Bank, 2002. "Poverty in Bangladesh : Building on Progress," World Bank Publications - Reports 15303, The World Bank Group.
    19. Tania Burchardt & Eleni Karagiannaki, 2022. "Living arrangements, intra-household inequality and children’s deprivation: Evidence from EU-SILC," CASE Papers /227, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    20. Plum Alexander, 2016. "Can Low-Wage Employment Help People Escape from the No-Pay – Low-Income Trap?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, October.
    21. Gaël Giraud & Cécile Renouard & Hélène L'Huillier & Raphaële de La Martinière & Camille Sutter, 2012. "Relational Capability: A Multidimensional Approach," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00827690, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:124:y:2015:i:1:p:67-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.