IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v5y2024i4d10.1007_s43069-024-00367-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Externality Costs and Intermittent Technologies in Generation Expansion Planning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Arif Saeed Malik

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Aamir Al-Kharusi

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Ahmed Al-Khathiri

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Yousuf Al-Mahrouqi

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

Abstract

The objective of the generation expansion master plan is to determine the necessary capacity and types of power plants for accommodating future load growth. The current software utilized for guiding generation planning primarily relies on the load duration curve (LDC) paradigm, which overlooks the chronological order of events. Additionally, the optimization process does not consider the environmental costs associated with power plants, as these costs are calculated separately once the optimal plan is finalized. This research study focuses on incorporating wind power plant modeling into generation planning models based on the LDC approach. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the integration of environmental costs into the optimization process, enabling researchers and policymakers to make more informed decisions regarding the growth of electricity and energy resources. The paper employs the widely used and reputable Wien Automatic System Planning (WASP) Package, version WASP-IV planning tool to identify the most optimal capacity expansion plans for Oman’s Main Interconnected Network (MIS) as a specific case study. In this tool, the load is represented using the LDC approach, while the built-in optimization feature does not account for environmental costs. To overcome this limitation, environmental costs are added to fuel costs so that they become part of the optimization function. The results show that when the opportunity cost of gas and environmental costs are considered in the optimization process, a significant number of wind generators are selected. To guarantee that non-dispatchable renewable technologies are fairly considered by decision-makers, the study suggests including opportunity costs as input data in generation planning models.

Suggested Citation

  • Arif Saeed Malik & Aamir Al-Kharusi & Ahmed Al-Khathiri & Yousuf Al-Mahrouqi, 2024. "Modeling Externality Costs and Intermittent Technologies in Generation Expansion Planning Models," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:5:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-024-00367-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-024-00367-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-024-00367-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-024-00367-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foley, A.M. & Ó Gallachóir, B.P. & Hur, J. & Baldick, R. & McKeogh, E.J., 2010. "A strategic review of electricity systems models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4522-4530.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    2. Collins, Seán & Deane, J.P. & Ó Gallachóir, Brian, 2017. "Adding value to EU energy policy analysis using a multi-model approach with an EU-28 electricity dispatch model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 433-447.
    3. Athanasios Ioannis Arvanitidis & Vivek Agarwal & Miltiadis Alamaniotis, 2023. "Nuclear-Driven Integrated Energy Systems: A State-of-the-Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Craig, Michael & Guerra, Omar J. & Brancucci, Carlo & Pambour, Kwabena Addo & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2020. "Valuing intra-day coordination of electric power and natural gas system operations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Liu, Wen & Hu, Weihao & Lund, Henrik & Chen, Zhe, 2013. "Electric vehicles and large-scale integration of wind power – The case of Inner Mongolia in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 445-456.
    6. Bianco, Vincenzo & Scarpa, Federico & Tagliafico, Luca A., 2015. "Long term outlook of primary energy consumption of the Italian thermoelectric sector: Impact of fuel and carbon prices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 153-164.
    7. Gianluca Fulli & Marcelo Masera & Catalin Felix Covrig & Francesco Profumo & Ettore Bompard & Tao Huang, 2017. "The EU Electricity Security Decision-Analytic Framework: Status and Perspective Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Jon Duan & G. Cornelis van Kooten & A. T. M. Hasibul Islam, 2023. "Calibration of Grid Models for Analyzing Energy Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Botor, Benjamin & Böcker, Benjamin & Kallabis, Thomas & Weber, Christoph, 2021. "Information shocks and profitability risks for power plant investments – impacts of policy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Hafiz, Faeza & Rodrigo de Queiroz, Anderson & Fajri, Poria & Husain, Iqbal, 2019. "Energy management and optimal storage sizing for a shared community: A multi-stage stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 42-54.
    11. Bianco, Vincenzo & Scarpa, Federico, 2018. "Impact of the phase out of French nuclear reactors on the Italian power sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 722-734.
    12. Li, Yan & Feng, Tian-tian & Liu, Li-li & Zhang, Meng-xi, 2023. "How do the electricity market and carbon market interact and achieve integrated development?--A bibliometric-based review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Jacques Després & Patrick Criqui & Silvana Mima & Nouredine Hadjsaid & Isabelle Noirot, 2014. "Variable renewable energies and storage development in long term energy modelling tools," Post-Print hal-01279467, HAL.
    14. Petitet, Marie & Perrot, Marie & Mathieu, Sébastien & Ernst, Damien & Phulpin, Yannick, 2019. "Impact of gate closure time on the efficiency of power systems balancing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 562-573.
    15. Zhang, Qi & Mclellan, Benjamin C. & Tezuka, Tetsuo & Ishihara, Keiichi N., 2012. "Economic and environmental analysis of power generation expansion in Japan considering Fukushima nuclear accident using a multi-objective optimization model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 986-995.
    16. González-Bravo, Ramón & Fuentes-Cortés, Luis Fabián & Ponce-Ortega, José María, 2017. "Defining priorities in the design of power and water distribution networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1026-1040.
    17. Bubak, Baran, 2020. "تخمین نرخ بهینه عوارض تراکم برای آزادراه‏های ایران با استفاده از مدل قیمت‏گذاری ارزش [Estimation of Optimal Rate for Compact Tariffs in Highways across Iran applying the Value Pricing Methodology]," MPRA Paper 105490, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Jens Weibezahn & Mario Kendziorski, 2019. "Illustrating the Benefits of Openness: A Large-Scale Spatial Economic Dispatch Model Using the Julia Language," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Diane Coyle, 2022. "Healthcare as social infrastructure: productivity and the UK NHS during and after Covid-19," Working Papers 017, The Productivity Institute.
    20. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Nybø, Astrid, 2020. "Transitioning remote Arctic settlements to renewable energy systems – A modelling study of Longyearbyen, Svalbard," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:5:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-024-00367-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.