IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v1y2021i3d10.1007_s43546-021-00042-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A barrier real option approach to evaluate public–private partnership projects and prevent moral hazard

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Di Bari

    (University of Bari)

Abstract

When governments contend with financial restrictions, they may form public–private partnerships (PPPs) to help fund projects. In these types of investments, private firms (i.e. concessionaires) develop public projects. The government supports the funding of these public projects by sharing the risk of future potential losses. To implement the risk-sharing mechanism, public administration could adopt a Minimum Revenues Guarantee (MRG) option for the concessionaire in the agreement. On the other hand, the government should monitor possible opportunistic morally hazardous behavior by private firms derived by fraudulent exercise of this option. This paper aims to evaluate a MRG option while considering both moral hazard and an adjusted version of the Real Option Approach (ROA). A threshold (i.e. barrier) to the project profitability evolution is applied, below which the concessionaire would lose their right to exercise the option. Identifying these factors should encourage private firms to pursue the best possible management performance and avoid moral hazard. This paper also proposes a numerical example to validate that private firms would have no advantage in conducting opportunistic behavior because such behavior would reduce the project value.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Di Bari, 2021. "A barrier real option approach to evaluate public–private partnership projects and prevent moral hazard," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:1:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s43546-021-00042-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-021-00042-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-021-00042-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-021-00042-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marek Durica & Danuse Guttenova & Ludovit Pinda & Lucia Svabova, 2018. "Sustainable Value of Investment in Real Estate: Real Options Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Lenos Trigeorgis, 1993. "Real Options and Interactions With Financial Flexibility," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 22(3), Fall.
    3. Nunzia Carbonara & Nicola Costantino & Roberta Pellegrino, 2014. "Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships: a fair risk allocation model," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 403-415, April.
    4. Marzouk, Mohamed & Ali, Mohamed, 2018. "Mitigating risks in wastewater treatment plant PPPs using minimum revenue guarantee and real options," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 121-133.
    5. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    6. K.C. Iyer & Mohammed Sagheer, 2011. "A real options based traffic risk mitigation model for build-operate-transfer highway projects in India," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(8), pages 771-779, June.
    7. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michele Bufalo & Antonio Di Bari & Giovanni Villani, 2023. "A Compound Up-and-In Call like Option for Wind Projects Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biancardi, Marta & Di Bari, Antonio & Villani, Giovanni, 2021. "R&D investment decision on smart cities: Energy sustainability and opportunity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P2).
    2. Kyungwon Kim & Jae Wook Song, 2020. "Detecting Possible Reduction of the Housing Bubble in Korea for Different Residential Types and Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-31, February.
    3. Antonio Di Bari, 2020. "A Real Options Approach to Valuate Solar Energy Investment with Public Authority Incentives: The Italian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Joao Carlos Monteiro & Jose António Filipe, 2012. "Managerial Flexibility in Turbulent Times of Crisis," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 2(4), pages 263-263.
    5. Jobst, Andreas A., 2014. "Measuring systemic risk-adjusted liquidity (SRL)—A model approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 270-287.
    6. Cuypers, I.R.P., 2009. "Essays on equity joint ventures, uncertainty and experience," Other publications TiSEM 8dc79e86-c625-467f-a450-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    8. Hillier, David & Marshall, Andrew P., 1998. "A model of complex equity funding for contingent acquisitions - a case study of non-interest bearing convertible unsecured loan stock," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 133-152, June.
    9. Gast¨®n S. Milanesi & Emilio El Alabi & Gabriela Pesce, 2015. "Continuity or Liquidation in Situations of Ambiguity: Fuzzy Binomial Model to Valuate Leveraged Firms," Research in Applied Economics, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 26-47, March.
    10. Twine, Edgar E. & Kiiza, Barnabas & Bashaasha, Bernard, 2015. "The Flexible Accelerator Model of Investment: An Application to Ugandan Tea- Processing Firms," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Wolfgang Kürsten, 1998. "„Zeitinkonsistente Hedgingstrategien”, oder: Von der infiniten Genese arbiträrer Entscheidungsmodelle — Replik zur Stellungnahme von Wolfgang Breuer," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 54-58, January.
    12. Ardian, Aldin & Kumral, Mustafa, 2020. "Incorporating stochastic correlations into mining project evaluation using the Jacobi process," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Camille Chaserant, 2007. "Autorité et flexibilité : quand la théorie des options interroge," Working Papers hal-04139207, HAL.
    14. Miller, Luke & Bertus, Mark, 2005. "License valuation in the aerospace industry: A real options approach," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3-4), pages 225-239.
    15. Douglas A. Bodner & William B. Rouse, 2007. "Understanding R&D value creation with organizational simulation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 64-82, March.
    16. Twine, Edgar E. & Omore, Amos & Githinji, Julius, 2018. "Uncertainty in milk production by smallholders in Tanzania and its implications for investment," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(1).
    17. Wang, Hao, 2011. "Managerial entrenchment, equity payout and capital structure," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 36-50, January.
    18. Lauren Chenarides & Mark Manfredo & Timothy J. Richards, 2021. "COVID‐19 and Food Supply Chains," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 270-279, March.
    19. Schachter, J.A. & Mancarella, P., 2016. "A critical review of Real Options thinking for valuing investment flexibility in Smart Grids and low carbon energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 261-271.
    20. Alkaraan, Fadi & Northcott, Deryl, 2006. "Strategic capital investment decision-making: A role for emergent analysis tools?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 149-173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:1:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s43546-021-00042-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.