IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v1y2021i12d10.1007_s43546-021-00168-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whole-process performance management of government procurement: a quantitative analysis of 58 policy texts

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Wang

    (Central University of Finance and Economics)

  • Fuguo Cao

    (Central University of Finance and Economics)

  • Jing Yang

    (Central University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

With the advancement of the comprehensive implementation of budget performance management, promoting the whole-process performance management of government procurement has become an important work of the current government procurement reform. This study takes 58 regulations related to performance management of government procurement of China as case study samples and uses text content analysis method to quantitatively analyze the status quo and problems of performance management policies in the whole process of government procurement from three dimensions. These three dimensions are the whole-process performance management activities, the type of performance policies and the disclosure of whole-process performance information. It can be found that there are three problems in China's current government procurement policy, namely the regulation of whole-process performance management activities needs to be optimized, the regulation of high-level performance management needs to be strengthened, and the regulation of whole-process performance information disclosure needs to be improved. Therefore, we should: first, optimize the regulation of the whole process performance management activity; second, increase the regulation of performance under the Government Procurement Law; third, improve the regulation of whole-process performance information disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Wang & Fuguo Cao & Jing Yang, 2021. "Whole-process performance management of government procurement: a quantitative analysis of 58 policy texts," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:1:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s43546-021-00168-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-021-00168-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-021-00168-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-021-00168-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ssengooba, Freddie & McPake, Barbara & Palmer, Natasha, 2012. "Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda – An “open-box” evaluation of a complex health system intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 377-383.
    2. Johnson, William H.A. & Medcof, John W., 2007. "Motivating proactive subsidiary innovation: Agent-based theory and socialization models in global R&D," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 472-487, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, William H.A., 2011. "Managing university technology development using organizational control theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 842-852, July.
    2. Ogundeji, Yewande Kofoworola & Bland, John Martin & Sheldon, Trevor Andrew, 2016. "The effectiveness of payment for performance in health care: A meta-analysis and exploration of variation in outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1141-1150.
    3. Walton, Mat, 2014. "Applying complexity theory: A review to inform evaluation design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-126.
    4. Fuguo Cao & Cong Wang, 2022. "An Empirical Study of Determinants of Pay-for-Performance in PPP Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Gammelgaard, Jens & McDonald, Frank & Stephan, Andreas & Tüselmann, Heinz & Dörrenbächer, Christoph, 2012. "The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1158-1172.
    6. Mayumana, Iddy & Borghi, Jo & Anselmi, Laura & Mamdani, Masuma & Lange, Siri, 2017. "Effects of Payment for Performance on accountability mechanisms: Evidence from Pwani, Tanzania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 61-73.
    7. Dixit Manjunatha Betaraya & Saboohi Nasim & Joy Mukhopadhyay, 2018. "Subsidiary Innovation in a Developing Economy: Towards a Comprehensive Model and Directions for Future Research," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 109-125, June.
    8. Maria Paola Bertone & Jean-Benoît Falisse & Giuliano Russo & Sophie Witter, 2018. "Context matters (but how and why?) A hypothesis-led literature review of performance based financing in fragile and conflict-affected health systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Chatzopoulou, Erifili-Christina & Dimitratos, Pavlos & Lioukas, Spyros, 2021. "Agency controls and subsidiary strategic initiatives: The mediating role of subsidiary autonomy," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    10. Khim, Keovathanak & Annear, Peter Leslie, 2013. "Strengthening district health service management and delivery through internal contracting: Lessons from pilot projects in Cambodia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 241-249.
    11. Nunzia Carbonara & Roberta Pellegrino, 2018. "Delivering innovation in public infrastructure through Public Private Partnerships," Chapters, in: Urban Gråsjö & Charlie Karlsson & Iréne Bernhard (ed.), Geography, Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship, chapter 4, pages 81-107, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Schmid, Stefan & Dzedek, Lars R. & Lehrer, Mark, 2014. "From Rocking the Boat to Wagging the Dog: A Literature Review of Subsidiary Initiative Research and Integrative Framework," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 201-218.
    13. Lohmann, Julia & Houlfort, Nathalie & De Allegri, Manuela, 2016. "Crowding out or no crowding out? A Self-Determination Theory approach to health worker motivation in performance-based financing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-8.
    14. Edwards, Tony & Tempel, Anne, 2010. "Explaining variation in reverse diffusion of HR practices: Evidence from the German and British subsidiaries of American multinationals," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 19-28, January.
    15. Khraishi, Ahmad & Huq, Fahian & Paulraj, Antony, 2020. "Offshoring innovation: An empirical investigation of dyadic complementarity within SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 86-97.
    16. Magrath, Priscilla & Nichter, Mark, 2012. "Paying for performance and the social relations of health care provision: An anthropological perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1778-1785.
    17. Andrews, Daniel S. & Fainshmidt, Stav & Newburry, William & Parente, Ronaldo & Haensel, Kira, 2023. "What determines subunit integration in the multinational firm? A meta-analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    18. Yana Buravleva & Decai Tang & Brandon J. Bethel, 2021. "Incentivizing Innovation: The Causal Role of Government Subsidies on Lithium-Ion Battery Research and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Wendy Olsen, 2019. "Bridging to Action Requires Mixed Methods, Not Only Randomised Control Trials," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 139-162, April.
    20. Duchoslav, Jan & Cecchi, Francesco, 2019. "Do incentives matter when working for god? The impact of performance-based financing on faith-based healthcare in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 309-319.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:1:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s43546-021-00168-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.