IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v67y2015i2d10.1007_bf03372922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Ermittlung des Risikozuschlags bei gesellschaftsrechtlichen Strukturmaßnahmen — Eine Auswertung von Bewertungsgutachten

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Hachmeister

    (Universität Hohenheim)

  • Frederik Ruthardt
  • Christopher Mager

    (Universität Hohenheim)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Im Wege eines Squeeze Out können Minderheitsgesellschafter von einem Mehrheitsgesellschafter gegen Gewähr einer angemessenen Barabfindung aus einer Aktiengesellschaft gedrängt werden. Für die Bemessung der Barabfindung wird eine Unternehmensbewertung auf Basis der Ertragswertmethode durchgeführt. Der adäquaten Ermittlung des Kapitalisierungszinssatzes kommt in diesem Fall eine wesentliche Bedeutung zu. In diesem Beitrag soll anhand einer repräsentativen Stichprobe von Bewertungsgutachten die in der Praxis vorherrschende Methodik zur kapitalmarktorientierten Ermittlung des Risikozuschlags (Tax-CAPM) untersucht und vor dem Hintergrund der Theorie gewürdigt werden. Der Fokus liegt auf der Ermittlung von Marktrisikoprämie und Betafaktor.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Hachmeister & Frederik Ruthardt & Christopher Mager, 2015. "Die Ermittlung des Risikozuschlags bei gesellschaftsrechtlichen Strukturmaßnahmen — Eine Auswertung von Bewertungsgutachten," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 206-234, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:67:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_bf03372922
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372922
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooper, Ian & Kaplanis, Evi, 1994. "Home Bias in Equity Portfolios, Inflation Hedging, and International Capital Market Equilibrium," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 45-60.
    2. Blume, Marshall E, 1975. "Betas and Their Regression Tendencies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 30(3), pages 785-795, June.
    3. Robert S. Harris & John J. Pringle, 1985. "Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates-Extensions From The Average-Risk Case," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 8(3), pages 237-244, September.
    4. Miles, James A. & Ezzell, John R., 1980. "The Weighted Average Cost of Capital, Perfect Capital Markets, and Project Life: A Clarification," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 719-730, September.
    5. Hamada, Robert S, 1972. "The Effect of the Firm's Capital Structure on the Systematic Risk of Common Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 435-452, May.
    6. Joshua D. Coval & Tobias J. Moskowitz, 1999. "Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(6), pages 2045-2073, December.
    7. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarmiento-Sabogal, Julio & Sadeghi, Mehdi, 2014. "Unlevered betas and the cost of equity capital: An empirical approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 90-105.
    2. Anders Johansson, 2009. "An analysis of dynamic risk in the Greater China equity markets," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 299-320.
    3. Mishra, Anil V., 2015. "Measures of equity home bias puzzle," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 293-312.
    4. Giofré, Maela, 2009. "The role of information asymmetries and inflation hedging in international equity portfolios," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 237-255, October.
    5. Daly, Kevin & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2013. "The determinants of home bias puzzle in equity portfolio investment in Australia," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-42.
    6. Keef, Stephen P & Khaled, Mohammed S & Roush, Melvin L, 2011. "Miller's (2009) WACC model: An extension," Working Paper Series 1995, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    7. Pasquale De Luca, 2017. "Debt Level and the Firm Levered Cost of Capital," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 475-484.
    8. Ian Dobbs & Anthony Miller, 2002. "Capital budgeting, valuation and personal taxes," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 227-243.
    9. Giofré, Maela, 2013. "International diversification: Households versus institutional investors," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 145-176.
    10. Eduard Gaar & David Scherer & Dirk Schiereck, 2022. "The home bias and the local bias: A survey," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 21-57, February.
    11. Coen, Alain, 2001. "Home bias and international capital asset pricing model with human capital," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4-5), pages 497-513, December.
    12. Lally, Martin & Swidler, Steve, 2003. "The effect of an asset's market weight on its beta: implications for international markets," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 161-170, April.
    13. Lee, Junyong & Lee, Kyounghun & Oh, Frederick Dongchuhl, 2023. "International portfolio diversification and the home bias puzzle," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Keef, Stephen P & Khaled, Mohammed S & Roush, Melvin L, 2011. "Miller's (2009) WACC model: An extension," Working Paper Series 18608, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    15. Chan, Kalok & Covrig, Vicentiu, 2012. "What determines mutual fund trading in foreign stocks?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 793-817.
    16. Mishra, Anil V., 2016. "Foreign bias in Australian-domiciled mutual fund holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-123.
    17. Massa, Massimo & Bai, Jennie, 2021. "Is Hard and Soft Information Substitutable? Evidence from the Lockdowns," CEPR Discussion Papers 15744, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Magdalena Mikolajek-Gocejna, 2021. "Estimation, Instability, and Non-Stationarity of Beta Coefficients for Twenty-four Emerging Markets in 2005-2021," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 370-395.
    19. André Farber & Roland Gillet & Ariane Szafarz, 2005. "A general formula for the WACC," Working Papers CEB 05-012.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Axel Pierru & Denis Babusiaux, 2000. "Coût du capital et étude de rentabilité d'investissement : une formulation unique de l'ensemble des méthodes," Working Papers hal-02437423, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G31; G32; G34;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:67:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_bf03372922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.