IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v64y2012i3d10.1007_bf03373692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eine wissenschaftsethische Anmerkung zum Beitrag „Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungs-honoraren auf diskretionäre Periodenabgrenzungen“ (erschienen in der zfbf, 63. Jg. (2011), S. 310–343)

Author

Listed:
  • Hansrudi Lenz

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansrudi Lenz, 2012. "Eine wissenschaftsethische Anmerkung zum Beitrag „Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungs-honoraren auf diskretionäre Periodenabgrenzun," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 262-270, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:64:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_bf03373692
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373692
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quick, Reiner & Sattler, M., 2011. "Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungshonoraren auf diskretionäre Periodenabgrenzungen," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 54029, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Keith L. Jones & Gopal V. Krishnan & Kevin D. Melendrez, 2008. "Do Models of Discretionary Accruals Detect Actual Cases of Fraudulent and Restated Earnings? An Empirical Analysis," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 499-531, June.
    3. Jere R. Francis, 2006. "Are Auditors Compromised by Nonaudit Services? Assessing the Evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 747-760, September.
    4. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    5. .Reiner Quick & Matthias Sattler, 2011. "Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungshonoraren auf diskretionäre Periodenabgrenzungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 310-343, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reiner Quick & Matthias Sattler, 2012. "Erwiderung auf Hansrudi Lenz: Eine wissenschaftsethische Anmerkung zum Beitrag „Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungshonoraren auf di," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 271-279, May.
    2. Ferrer García, Cristina & Laínez Gadea, José Antonio, 2013. "Detectando diferencias en la medición de la calidad del resultado: evidencia empírica para empresas españolas || Detecting Differences on the Earnings Quality Measurement: Empirical Evidence on Spanis," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 16(1), pages 5-28, December.
    3. Praveen Sinha & Herbert G. Hunt, 2013. "Auditor Independence: A Nonparametric Test of Differences Across the Big‐5 Public Accounting Firms," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 301-320, December.
    4. Preeti Choudhary & Allison Koester & Terry Shevlin, 2016. "Measuring income tax accrual quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 89-139, March.
    5. Anastasia Kraft & Kerstin Lopatta, 2016. "Auditor fees, discretionary book-tax differences, and tax avoidance," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 127-155.
    6. Oz, Seda, 2024. "The impact of terrorist attacks and mass shootings on earnings management," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    7. Marco Angelo Marinoni & Anna Maria Fellegara & Andrea Lippi, 2022. "Potential Threats to Audit Firm Independence: Evidence from Italy on Audit Quality," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(6), pages 1-88, June.
    8. Liang, Jian & Dong, Zhi, 2019. "The impact of the stapled security structure on the quality of financial disclosure: Evidence from Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts and Listed Infrastructure Funds," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 206-223.
    9. Andrew B. Jackson, 2018. "Discretionary Accruals: Earnings Management ... or Not?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(2), pages 136-153, June.
    10. Rutherford, Brian A., 2013. "A genre-theoretic approach to financial reporting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 297-310.
    11. Marie Herly & Jan Bartholdy & Frank Thinggaard, 2020. "A re‐examination of accruals quality following restatements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 882-909, July.
    12. Dauth, Tobias & Pronobis, Paul & Schmid, Stefan, 2017. "Exploring the link between internationalization of top management and accounting quality: The CFO’s international experience matters," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 71-88.
    13. J�rgen Ernstberger & Michael Stich & Oliver Vogler, 2012. "Economic Consequences of Accounting Enforcement Reforms: The Case of Germany," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 217-251, August.
    14. Crawley, Michael & Wahlen, James, 2014. "Analytics in empirical/archival financial accounting research," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 583-593.
    15. Salim Chahine & Yiwei Fang & Iftekhar Hasan & Mohamad Mazboudi, 2021. "CEO Network Centrality and the Likelihood of Financial Reporting Fraud," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(4), pages 654-678, December.
    16. DeFond, Mark L., 2010. "Earnings quality research: Advances, challenges and future research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 402-409, December.
    17. Harakeh, Mostafa & Leventis, Stergios & El Masri, Tarek & Tsileponis, Nikolaos, 2023. "The moderating role of board gender diversity on the relationship between firm opacity and stock returns," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    18. Marie Herly & Nikolaj Niebuhr Lambertsen, 2023. "Restatement costs and reporting bias," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 91-117, January.
    19. Harakeh, Mostafa & El-Gammal, Walid & Matar, Ghida, 2019. "Female directors, earnings management, and CEO incentive compensation: UK evidence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 153-170.
    20. Maria Strydom & Hue Hwa Au Yong & Michaela Rankin, 2017. "A few good (wo)men? Gender diversity on Australian boards," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 404-427, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:64:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_bf03373692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.