IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v59y2007i5d10.1007_bf03371714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vorteile für Beschaffungsbeziehungen in Clustern? Eine vergleichende transaktionskostenanalytische Betrachtung

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Fussan

    (Georg-Simon-Ohm Fachhochschule Nürnberg übernommen)

  • Katja Klepper

    (Freien Universität Berlin und einer Tätigkeit bei McKinsey im Bereich „strategische Geschäftsentwicklung“ der Deutschen Bahn AG)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Netzwerksynergien werden oft als Vorteil regionaler Industriecluster genannt. Aber sind diese Synergien wirklich relevant genug, um Cluster als Unternehmensumgebung aktiv für die Optimierung von Beschaffungsstrukturen zu nutzen? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage werden Beschaffungsbeziehungen innerhalb von Industrienetzwerken (Clustern) und alternativ zwischen nicht netzwerkverbundenen Partnern diskutiert. Den vertragsökonomischen Aspekten dieser Fragestellung wird dabei durch Verwendung des Transaktionskostenansatzes Rechnung getragen. Die Ergebnisse der Betrachtung in Form einer Entscheidungsmatrix für Netzwerkbeschaffung wurden durch eine Unternehmensbefragung überprüft, in deren Folge ein Cluster-Lebenszyklusmodell für verschiedene Cluster- und Beschaffungsszenarien entwickelt werden konnte. Dabei zeigt sich, dass nur in zwei Lebenszyklusphasen die Beschaffungsorganisation innerhalb von Clustern gegenüber netzwerkexterner Zuliefererkontrahierung überlegen ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Fussan & Katja Klepper, 2007. "Vorteile für Beschaffungsbeziehungen in Clustern? Eine vergleichende transaktionskostenanalytische Betrachtung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 588-614, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:59:y:2007:i:5:d:10.1007_bf03371714
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03371714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03371714
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03371714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Maskell & Mark Lorenzen, 2003. "The Cluster as Market Organization," DRUID Working Papers 03-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    2. Wolfgang Burr, 2003. "Fundierung von Leistungstiefenentscheidungen auf der Basis modifizierter Transaktionskostenansätze," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 112-134, March.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E, 1993. "Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 453-486, April.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1981. "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1537-1568, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Bode & Ingo Däberitz & Juri Fionik, 2011. "Messung von Kooperationserfolg in Clustern," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(7), pages 662-688, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. García-Vega, María & Huergo, Elena, 2017. "Trust and technology transfers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 92-104.
    2. Alejandro Agafonow & Marybel Perez, 2023. "How A Social Enterprise Wanes: The Transaction Costs of Credible Commitments at Etsy.com," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 35(1), pages 83-107, January.
    3. Todorova, Tamara, 2022. "Оливър Уилямсън: Новатор На 20 Век И Основател На Новата Институционална Икономика [Oliver Williamson: an innovator of the 20th century and founder of the new institutional economics]," MPRA Paper 121077, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Marta Peris-Ortiz & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2010. "Organisational capabilities and transaction costs in the analysis of activities and their externalisation: implications for the service industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 4(2), pages 105-122, June.
    5. Marta Peris-Ortiz & Fernando Peris Bonet & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2011. "Vertical integration in production and services: development in transaction cost economics," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(1), pages 87-97, March.
    6. Prince Hikouatcha & Alain Gilles Tagne Foka & Armand Depesquidoux Fossi & Simplice A Asongu, 2024. "Empirical investigation of the Fintech and financial literacy nexus: Small business managers’ insights in Cameroon," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 219-237, February.
    7. Pasinetti, Luigi L., 2021. "Economic theory and institutions," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 438-442.
    8. T.R.L. Fry & R.D. Brooks & Br. Comley & J. Zhang, 1993. "Economic Motivations for Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variable Models," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 69(2), pages 193-205, June.
    9. Asmund Rygh & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2018. "Capital Structure of Foreign Direct Investments: A Transaction Cost Analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 389-411, June.
    10. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    11. Arturo Galindo & Alberto Chong & César Calderón, 2001. "Structure and Development of Financial Institutions and Links with Trust: Cross-Country Evidence," Research Department Publications 4251, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    12. Luciana Lazzeretti & Rafael Boix & Francesco Capone, 2009. "Why do creative industries cluster? An analysis of the determinants of clustering of creative industries," Institut Metròpoli Working Paper in economics 0902, Institut Metròpoli.
    13. Shi, Wei & Tang, Yinuo, 2015. "Cultural similarity as in-group favoritism: The impact of religious and ethnic similarities on alliance formation and announcement returns," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 32-46.
    14. Giacomo Calzolari & Leonardo Felli & Johannes Koenen & Giancarlo Spagnolo & Konrad O. Stahl, 2021. "Relational Contracts and Trust in a High-Tech Industry," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_316, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    15. Jonathan Labbé, 2017. "Private Equity: Universality of financing and universality of effects on business innovation? A conceptual approach [Capital-investissement : Universalité du financement et universalité des effets ," Post-Print hal-03000109, HAL.
    16. Jens Hagendorff & Sonya Lim & Duc Duy Nguyen, 2023. "Lender Trust and Bank Loan Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1758-1779, March.
    17. Hamilton-Hart, Natasha & Stringer, Christina, 2016. "Upgrading and exploitation in the fishing industry: Contributions of value chain analysis," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 166-171.
    18. Casey Ichniowski, 1990. "Human Resource Management Systems and the Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Businesses," NBER Working Papers 3449, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Cordes, Christian & Richerson, Peter J. & Schwesinger, Georg, 2010. "How corporate cultures coevolve with the business environment: The case of firm growth crises and industry evolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 465-480, December.
    20. Michel Zouboulakis, 2010. "Trustworthiness as a Moral Determinant of Economic Activity: Lessons from the Classics," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 209-221, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    D23; D82;

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:59:y:2007:i:5:d:10.1007_bf03371714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.