IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v58y2006i6d10.1007_bf03371682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motive für den Rückzug von der Börse — Ergebnisse einer Befragung deutscher Going Private-Unternehmen

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Eisele

    (Corporate Controlling der DaimlerChrysler AG)

  • Andreas Walter

    (Universität Tübingen)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung In Deutschland ist in den letzten Jahren zu beobachten, dass sich immer mehr einst börsennotierte Unternehmen in einem Going Private von der Börse zurückziehen. Die vorliegende Erhebung untersucht erstmalig anhand eines primären, fragebogenbasierten Datensatzes für den deutschen Kapitalmarkt, welche der in der Literatur angeführten potenziellen Motive für ein Going Private in der unternehmerischen Praxis tatsächlich relevant sind und welchen lediglich theoretische Erklärungskraft beigemessen werden kann. Über die Analyse der Motivlage hinaus ermöglicht die Konzeption des Fragebogens ferner, Aussagen über die Entwicklung der Going Private-Unternehmen nach dem Börsenrückzug zu treffen.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Eisele & Andreas Walter, 2006. "Motive für den Rückzug von der Börse — Ergebnisse einer Befragung deutscher Going Private-Unternehmen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 807-833, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:58:y:2006:i:6:d:10.1007_bf03371682
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03371682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03371682
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03371682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Lehn & Annette Poulsen, 1989. "Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 44(3), pages 771-787, July.
    2. Tim C. Opler, 1992. "Operating Performance in Leveraged Buyouts: Evidence From 1985 - 1989," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 21(1), Spring.
    3. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    4. Robert L. Kieschnick, Jr, 1998. "Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions Revisited," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1‐2), pages 187-202, January.
    5. Opler, Tim & Titman, Sheridan, 1993. "The Determinants of Leveraged Buyout Activity: Free Cash Flow vs. Financial Distress Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1985-1999, December.
    6. Robert L. Kieschnick, Jr, 1998. "Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions Revisited," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1&2), pages 187-202.
    7. David J. Denis, 1992. "Corporate Investment Decisions and Corporate Control: Evidence From Going-Private Transactions," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 21(3), Fall.
    8. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:3:p:771-87 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Eisele & Andreas Walter, 2006. "Kursreaktionen auf die Ankündigung von Going Private-Transaktionen am deutschen Kapitalmarkt," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 337-362, May.
    2. Renneboog, L.D.R. & Simons, T., 2005. "Public-to-Private Transactions : LBOs, MBOs, MBIs and IBOs," Other publications TiSEM 3b76799c-591c-4d22-b126-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Renneboog, Luc & Vansteenkiste, Cara, 2017. "Leveraged Buyouts : A Survey of the Literature," Discussion Paper 2017-015, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Walter, Andreas & Eisele, Florian, 2003. "Kurswertreaktionen auf die Ankündigung von Going Private : Transaktionen am deutschen Kapitalmarkt," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 274, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    5. Ann†Kristin Achleitner & André Betzer & Marc Goergen & Bastian Hinterramskogler, 2013. "Private Equity Acquisitions of Continental European Firms: the Impact of Ownership and Control on the Likelihood of Being Taken Private," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 19(1), pages 72-107, January.
    6. Andrew Metrick & Ayako Yasuda, 2011. "Venture Capital and Other Private Equity: a Survey," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 619-654, September.
    7. Jana P. Fidrmuc & Alessandro Palandri & Peter Roosenboom & Dick van Dijk, 2013. "When Do Managers Seek Private Equity Backing in Public-to-Private Transactions?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(3), pages 1099-1139.
    8. Belkhir, Mohamed & Boubaker, Sabri & Rouatbi, Wael, 2013. "Excess control, agency costs and the probability of going private in France," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 250-265.
    9. Renneboog, L.D.R. & Simons, T. & Wright, M., 2005. "Leveraged Public to Private Transactions in the UK," Discussion Paper 2005-60, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Ayash, Brian & Schütt, Harm, 2016. "Does going private add value through operating improvements?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 192-215.
    11. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-605 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Gottschalg, Oliver & Berg, Achim, 2005. "Understanding value generation in buyouts," HEC Research Papers Series 824, HEC Paris.
    13. Renneboog, Luc & Simons, Tomas & Wright, Mike, 2007. "Why do public firms go private in the UK? The impact of private equity investors, incentive realignment and undervaluation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 591-628, September.
    14. Nikoskelainen, Erkki & Wright, Mike, 2007. "The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on value increase in leveraged buyouts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 511-537, September.
    15. James Brau & J. Carpenter & Mauricio Rodriguez & C. Sirmans, 2013. "REIT Going Private Decisions," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 24-43, January.
    16. Manuela Geranio & Giovanna Zanotti, 2012. "Equity Markets Do Not Fit All: an Analysis of Public†to†Private Deals in Continental Europe," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 18(5), pages 867-895, November.
    17. Stuart, Toby E. & Yim, Soojin, 2010. "Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 174-189, July.
    18. Toby Stuart & Soojin Yim, 2008. "Board Interlocks and the Propensity to be Targeted in Private Equity Transactions," NBER Working Papers 14189, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Tåg, Joacim, 2010. "The Real Effects of Private Equity Buyouts," Working Paper Series 851, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    20. Martinez, Isabelle & Serve, Stéphanie, 2011. "The delisting decision: The case of buyout offer with squeeze-out (BOSO)," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 228-239.
    21. Oskar Kowalewski & Krzysztof Jackowicz, 2005. "Why Companies Go Private in Emerging Markets? Evidence from Poland," Finance 0511013, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G34;

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:58:y:2006:i:6:d:10.1007_bf03371682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.