IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v55y2003i3d10.1007_bf03372706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nutzen von Abschlussprüfungen: Bezugsrahmen und Einordnung empirischer Studien

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Ruhnke

    (Freie Universität Berlin)

Abstract

Summary The following study develops an object-oriented research framework to prove the usefulness of audits. This framework integrates various elements and constructs associated with the usefulness of audits. The relationship between the elements and constructs are shown. Next, the results of central empirical studies are assigned to respective categories. This integrative approach makes it possible, to draw up a systematic overview of the empirical usefulness research. On the one hand, this may stimulate new empirical research projects and, on the other hand, it should open up possibilities for more profound theoretical research projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Ruhnke, 2003. "Nutzen von Abschlussprüfungen: Bezugsrahmen und Einordnung empirischer Studien," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 250-280, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:55:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1007_bf03372706
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372706
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clarkson, Peter M. & Simunic, Dan A., 1994. "The association between audit quality, retained ownership, and firm-specific risk in U.S. vs. Canadian IPO markets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 207-228, January.
    2. Clive S. Lennox, 1999. "The Accuracy and Incremental Information Content of Audit Reports in Predicting Bankruptcy," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5‐6), pages 757-778, June.
    3. Clive S. Lennox, 1999. "The Accuracy and Incremental Information Content of Audit Reports in Predicting Bankruptcy," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5&6), pages 757-778.
    4. Beatty, Rp, 1993. "The Economic-Determinants Of Auditor Compensation In The Initial Public Offerings Market," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 294-302.
    5. Jere R. Francis & Jagan Krishnan, 1999. "Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 135-165, March.
    6. Gambling, Trevor, 1987. "Accounting for rituals," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 319-329, June.
    7. Willenborg, M, 1999. "Empirical analysis of the economic demand for auditing in the initial public offerings market," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 225-238.
    8. Pany, K & Smith, Ch, 1982. "Auditor Association With Quarterly Financial Information - An Empirical-Test," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 472-481.
    9. Craswell, Allen T. & Francis, Jere R. & Taylor, Stephen L., 1995. "Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 297-322, December.
    10. Feltham, Gerald A. & Hughes, John S. & Simunic, Dan A., 1991. "Empirical assessment of the impact of auditor quality on the valuation of new issues," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 375-399, December.
    11. Harris, Ts & Lang, M & Moller, Hp, 1994. "The Value Relevance Of German Accounting Measures - An Empirical-Analysis," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 187-209.
    12. Holder-Webb, LM & Wilkins, MS, 2000. "The incremental information content of SAS No. 59 going-concern opinions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 209-219.
    13. Blackwell, DW & Noland, TR & Winters, DB, 1998. "The value of auditor assurance: Evidence from loan pricing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 57-70.
    14. Anderson, Don & Francis, Jere R. & Stokes, Donald J., 1993. "Auditing, directorships and the demand for monitoring," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 353-375.
    15. Alford, A & Jones, J & Leftwich, R & Zmijewski, M, 1993. "The Relative Informativeness Of Accounting Disclosures In Different Countries," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31, pages 183-223.
    16. Quick, Reiner & Marten, K.-U. & Ruhnke, K., 2001. "Wirtschaftsprüfung, Grundlagen des betriebswirtschaftlichen Prüfungswesens nach nationalen und internationalen Normen," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 67734, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Connie L. Becker & Mark L. Defond & James Jiambalvo & K.R. Subramanyam, 1998. "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Johnson, W. Bruce & Lys, Thomas, 1990. "The market for audit services : Evidence from voluntary auditor changes," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-3), pages 281-308, January.
    19. Michael Firth, 1990. "Auditor Reputation: The Impact of Critical Reports Issued by Government Inspectors," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 21(3), pages 374-387, Autumn.
    20. Dopuch, N & King, Rr & Schatzberg, Jw, 1994. "An Experimental Investigation Of Alternative Damage-Sharing Liability Regimes With An Auditing Perspective," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32, pages 103-130.
    21. Schaefer, James & Welker, Robert B., 1994. "Distinguishing characteristics of certified public accountants disciplined for unprofessional behavior," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 97-119.
    22. Karen Wilken Braun, 2001. "The Disposition of Audit†Detected Misstatements: An Examination of Risk and Reward Factors and Aggregation Effects," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 71-99, March.
    23. Kinney, William Jr. & McDaniel, Linda S., 1989. "Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 71-93, February.
    24. Firth, Michael & Smith, Andrew, 1995. "Auditor Quality, Corporate Risk, and the Valuation of New Issues," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 241-251, September.
    25. WILLIAM HOPWOOD & JAMES C. McKEOWN & JANE F. MUTCHLER, 1994. "A Reexamination of Auditor versus Model Accuracy within the Context of the Going†Concern Opinion Decision," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 409-431, March.
    26. Ettredge, ML & Simon, DT & Smith, DB & Stone, MS, 2000. "The effect of the external accountant's review on the timing of adjustments to quarterly earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 195-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Puschmann, Lina Carine, 2019. "Die Rotation des verantwortlichen Prüfungspartners als Instrument zur Steigerung der Prüfungsqualität," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 4(4), pages 553-565.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    2. Lin, Z. Jun & Liu, Ming, 2009. "The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: Evidence from China," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 44-59.
    3. Dennis M. O'Reilly & Robert A. Leitch & Brad Tuttle, 2006. "An Experimental Test of the Interaction of the Insurance and Information†Signaling Hypotheses in Auditing," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 267-289, March.
    4. Steve Fortin & Jeffrey A. Pittman, 2007. "The Role of Auditor Choice in Debt Pricing in Private Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 859-896, September.
    5. Dang, Man & Puwanenthiren, Premkanth & Truong, Cameron & Henry, Darren & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Audit quality and seasoned equity offerings methods," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Zhifeng Yang, 2013. "Do Political Connections Add Value to Audit Firms? Evidence from IPO Audits in China," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 891-921, September.
    7. Paul A. Copley & Edward B. Douthett, 2002. "The Association between Auditor Choice, Ownership Retained, and Earnings Disclosure by Firms Making Initial Public Offerings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 49-76, March.
    8. Stuart, Iris & Shin, Yong-Chul & Cram, Donald P. & Karan, Vijay, 2013. "Review of choice-based, matched, and other stratified sample studies in auditing research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-113.
    9. Xin Chang & André F. Gygax & Elaine Oon & Hong Feng Zhang, 2008. "Audit quality, auditor compensation and initial public offering underpricing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 391-416, September.
    10. Li‐Ying Huang & Gene C. Lai & Erin Lu & Michael McNamara, 2020. "Auditor quality, audit fees, organizational structure, and risk taking in the US life insurance industry," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(2), pages 151-182, June.
    11. Lai, Kam-Wah, 2013. "Audit Reporting of Big 4 Versus Non-Big 4 Auditors: The Case of Ex-Andersen Clients," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 495-524.
    12. Stefano Azzali & Tatiana Mazza & Fernanda Alberto, 2021. "Effects of disclosed audit sanctions on audit firm’s market share in Italy and Spain," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2477-2505, April.
    13. Joseph Weber & Michael Willenborg, 2003. "Do Expert Informational Intermediaries Add Value? Evidence from Auditors in Microcap Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 681-720, September.
    14. Cook, Jonathan & Kowaleski, Zachary T. & Minnis, Michael & Sutherland, Andrew & Zehms, Karla M., 2020. "Auditors are known by the companies they keep," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    15. Geiger, Marshall A. & Basioudis, Ilias G. & DeLange, Paul, 2022. "The effect of non-audit fees and industry specialization on the prevalence and accuracy of auditor’s going-concern reporting decisions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    16. Deqiu Chen & Li Li & Xuejiao Liu & Gerald J. Lobo, 2018. "Social Trust and Auditor Reporting Conservatism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1083-1108, December.
    17. Zhi-Yuan Feng & Hua-Wei Huang & Mai Dao, 2020. "U.S. Big 4 and Local Auditors in the China Initial Public Offering Market," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Brad Badertscher & Bjorn Jorgensen & Sharon Katz & William Kinney, 2014. "Public Equity and Audit Pricing in the United States," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 303-339, May.
    19. Aloke Ghosh & Steven Lustgarten, 2006. "Pricing of Initial Audit Engagements by Large and Small Audit Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 333-368, June.
    20. Chrysovalantis Gaganis, 2009. "Classification techniques for the identification of falsified financial statements: a comparative analysis," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 207-229, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M41; M49;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:55:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1007_bf03372706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.