IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v54y2002i2d10.1023_a1016013912188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informetric analysis of a music database

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Nelson

    (Univ. of Western Ontario)

  • J. Stephen Downie

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

We analyse the statistical properties a database of musical notes for the purpose of designing an information retrieval system as part of the Musifind project. In order to reduce the amount of musical information we convert the database to the intervals between notes, which will make the database easier to search. We also investigate a further simplification by creating equivalence classes of musical intervals which also increases the resilience of searches to errors in the query. The Zipf, Zipf-Mandelbrot, Generalized Waring (GW) and Generalized Inverse Gaussian-Poisson (GIGP) distributions are tested against these various representations with the GIGP distribution providing the best overall fit for the data. There are many similarities with text databases, especially those with short bibliographic records. There are also some differences, particularly in the highest frequency intervals which occur with a much lower frequency than the highest frequency “stopwords” in a text database. This provides evidence to support the hypothesis that traditional text retrieval methods will work for a music database.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Nelson & J. Stephen Downie, 2002. "Informetric analysis of a music database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 54(2), pages 243-255, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:54:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1016013912188
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1016013912188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1016013912188
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1016013912188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. S. Sichel, 1985. "A bibliometric distribution which really works," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 36(5), pages 314-321, September.
    2. Leo Egghe, 2000. "The Distribution of N-Grams," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(2), pages 237-252, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajiferuke Isola & Wolfram Dietmar, 2004. "Modelling the characteristics of Web page outlinks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(1), pages 43-62, January.
    2. Sarabia, José María & Gómez-Déniz, Emilio & Sarabia, María & Prieto, Faustino, 2010. "A general method for generating parametric Lorenz and Leimkuhler curves," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 524-539.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan M. Gerken & Martin G. Moehrle, 2012. "A new instrument for technology monitoring: novelty in patents measured by semantic patent analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 645-670, June.
    2. Quentin L. Burrel, 2001. "Stochastic modelling of the first-citation distribution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(1), pages 3-12, September.
    3. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    4. Quentin L. Burrell, 2002. "The nth-citation distribution and obsolescence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 53(3), pages 309-323, March.
    5. A. Baccini & L. Barabesi & M. Cioni & C. Pisani, 2014. "Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 2035-2062, December.
    6. Mingers, John & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "A review of theory and practice in scientometrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 1-19.
    7. Piotr Gabrielczak & Tomasz Serwach, 2019. "Firm-size distribution in Poland – is power law applicable?," Lodz Economics Working Papers 3/2019, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology.
    8. Sarabia, José María & Gómez-Déniz, Emilio & Sarabia, María & Prieto, Faustino, 2010. "A general method for generating parametric Lorenz and Leimkuhler curves," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 524-539.
    9. Quentin L. Burrell, 2007. "Time-dependent aspects of co-concentration in informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(2), pages 161-174, November.
    10. Khreisat, Laila, 2009. "A machine learning approach for Arabic text classification using N-gram frequency statistics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 72-77.
    11. Xavier Puig & Josep Ginebra & Marti Font, 2010. "The Sichel model and the mixing and truncation order," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1585-1603.
    12. Quentin L. Burrell, 2014. "The individual author’s publication–citation process: theory and practice," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 725-742, January.
    13. Ajiferuke Isola & Wolfram Dietmar, 2004. "Modelling the characteristics of Web page outlinks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(1), pages 43-62, January.
    14. Martin G. Moehrle & Jan M. Gerken, 2012. "Measuring textual patent similarity on the basis of combined concepts: design decisions and their consequences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 805-826, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:54:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1016013912188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.