IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v53y2002i2d10.1023_a1014804608785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Researchers" and users" perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals

Author

Listed:
  • Grant Lewison

    (E Northampton Square City University, Bibliometrics Research Group)

Abstract

Journal citation impact factors, which are frequently used as a surrogate measure of research quality, do not correlate well with UK researchers" subjective views of the relative importance of journals as media for communicating important biomedical research results. The correlation varies with the sub-field: it is almost zero in nursing research but is moderate in more “scientific” sub-fields such as multiple sclerosis research, characterised by many authors per paper and appreciable foreign co-authorship. If research evaluation is to be based on journal-specific indicators, then these must cover different aspects of the process whereby research impacts on other researchers and on healthcare improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Grant Lewison, 2002. "Researchers" and users" perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 53(2), pages 229-240, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:53:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1014804608785
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1014804608785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1014804608785
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1014804608785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daisy Jacobs & Peter Ingwersen, 2000. "A Bibliometric Study of the Publication Patterns in the Sciences of South African Scholars 1981–96," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(1), pages 75-93, January.
    2. G. Lewison, 1999. "The definition and calibration of biomedical subfields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 529-537, November.
    3. Grant Lewison, 2001. "The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(1), pages 29-43, September.
    4. Declan Butler, 1998. "France sets high targets for impact factors and patents," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6691), pages 309-309, July.
    5. Marc Luwel, 2000. "A Bibliometric Profile of Flemish Research in Natural, Life and Technical Sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(2), pages 281-302, February.
    6. A. J. Nederhof & E. Wijk, 1999. "Profiling institutes: Identifying high research performance and social relevance in the social and behavioral sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 44(3), pages 487-506, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brenda Cheang & Chongshou Li & Andrew Lim & Zhenzhen Zhang, 2015. "Identifying patterns and structural influences in the scientific communication of business knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 159-189, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqueline Leta & Grant Lewison, 2003. "The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 57(3), pages 339-353, July.
    2. Heidi Prozesky & Catherine Beaudry, 2019. "Mobility, Gender and Career Development in Higher Education: Results of a Multi-Country Survey of African Academic Scientists," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Grit Laudel, 2003. "Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 57(2), pages 215-237, June.
    4. Elena Pallari & Grant Lewison, 2022. "Cardiovascular and cancer risk factors analysis for 2001–2020 from the global research output and European newspapers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5159-5174, September.
    5. Sabrina Petersohn & Thomas Heinze, 2018. "Professionalization of bibliometric research assessment. Insights from the history of the Leiden Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 565-578.
    6. Peter Ingwersen & Daisy Jacobs, 2004. "South African research in selected scientific areas: Status 1981–2000," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(3), pages 405-423, March.
    7. Mauro Vitor Mendlowicz & Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho & Jerson Laks & Leonardo Franklin Fontenelle & Alexandre Martins Valença & William Berger & Ivan Figueira & Gláucia Azambuja Aguiar, 2011. "Is there a ‘gender gap’ in authorship of the main Brazilian psychiatric journals at the beginning of the 21st century?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 27-37, January.
    8. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Medical research in South Africa: a scientometric analysis of trends, patterns, productivity and partnership," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 863-885, September.
    9. Jamali, Seyedh Mahboobeh & Md Zain, Ahmad Nurulazam & Samsudin, Mohd Ali & Ale Ebrahim, Nader, 2015. "Publication Trends in Physics Education: A Bibliometric study," MPRA Paper 79524, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    10. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Science and scientific collaboration in South Africa: apartheid and after," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 373-390, August.
    11. Robert J. W. Tijssen, 2007. "Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(2), pages 303-327, May.
    12. Hamzehali Nourmohammadi & Fateme Hodaei, 2014. "Perspective of Iranian women’s scientific production in high priority fields of science and technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1455-1471, February.
    13. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    14. K. C. Garg & S. Kumar, 2014. "Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1771-1783, March.
    15. Nora Narváez-Berthelemot & Jane M. Russell & Rigas Arvanitis & Roland Waast & Jacques Gaillard, 2002. "Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 54(2), pages 229-241, June.
    16. Christian Schneijderberg & Nicolai Götze & Lars Müller, 2022. "A study of 25 years of publication outputs in the German academic profession," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Torben Schubert & Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Can the centre–periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 181-203, April.
    18. Elba Mauleón & Laura Hillán & Luz Moreno & Isabel Gómez & María Bordons, 2013. "Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 87-114, April.
    19. Carmen López-Illescas & Ed C.M. Noyons & Martijn S. Visser & Félix De Moya-Anegón & Henk F. Moed, 2009. "Expansion of scientific journal categories using reference analysis: How can it be done and does it make a difference?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 79(3), pages 473-490, June.
    20. Diana Hicks, 2005. "The Four Literatures Of Social Sciences," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:53:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1014804608785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.