IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v129y2024i11d10.1007_s11192-024-05145-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdisciplinarity and expert rating: an analysis based on faculty opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Shiji Chen

    (Hangzhou Dianzi University
    Université de Montréal)

  • Kaiqi Zhang

    (Hangzhou Dianzi University)

  • Junping Qiu

    (Hangzhou Dianzi University)

  • Jiaqi Chai

    (China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences)

Abstract

The evaluation of interdisciplinary research is a crucial area of investigation in research evaluation. Many studies have examined the scientific impact of interdisciplinary research by assessing citation impact. However, there is a lack of research exploring the relationship between interdisciplinarity and peer review or expert opinions, particularly at the article level. This study aims to scrutinize the relationship between interdisciplinarity and both citation impact and Faculty Opinions recommendations (FORs) based on the dataset comprising 184,910 articles and 230,928 expert ratings from Faculty Opinions. The analysis yields two notable conclusions. Firstly, interdisciplinary research demonstrates a positive association with citations when considering composite interdisciplinarity indicators. Meanwhile, separate diversity measures reveal that variety and disparity positively impact citations, whereas balance exhibits a negative association with citations. Furthermore, a curvilinear relationship between interdisciplinarity and citations was identified, characterized by a U-shaped or J-shaped curve. Secondly, interdisciplinary research shows a negative association with FORs regarding composite interdisciplinarity indicators, indicating that experts are less likely to recommend interdisciplinary research. Analysis of separate diversity measures reveals that balance consistently exhibits a negative correlation with FORs, and disparity consistently displays a negative U-shaped association with FORs. In conclusion, although interdisciplinarity enhances citation impact, it appears to be underappreciated in Faculty Opinions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiji Chen & Kaiqi Zhang & Junping Qiu & Jiaqi Chai, 2024. "Interdisciplinarity and expert rating: an analysis based on faculty opinions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(11), pages 6597-6628, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05145-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05145-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05145-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-05145-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05145-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.