IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v128y2023i8d10.1007_s11192-023-04764-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references

Author

Listed:
  • Yujie Zhang

    (East China Normal University)

  • Hongzhen Li

    (East China Normal University)

  • Jingyi Mao

    (East China Normal University)

  • Guoxiu He

    (East China Normal University
    East China Normal University)

  • Yunhan Yang

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Zhuoren Jiang

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Yufeng Duan

    (East China Normal University)

Abstract

According to existing research, in the general scientific backdrop, individuals prefer to employ old and well-established knowledge to promote scientific advancement, resulting in the progress of science in a set direction. When the disruption event COVID-19 occurred, however, people’s demand for breakthrough research, such as vaccinations or treatments, became increasingly pressing. Under such circumstances, can the accumulated coronavirus-related knowledge still give solid support for COVID-19 research? The manner of utilizing and absorbing new knowledge in the citing publications is reflected in the reference analysis. To investigate this proposition, we employ reference analysis to conduct retrospectives on relevant scientific articles. We locate 309,517 related papers and their references in the CORD-19 data from 2000 to 2021. We analyze the knowledge support capacity of previous studies from three aspects: the quantity, timeliness, and textual support of references. Among them, textual support is divided into lexical, topic, and semantic support, which are respectively based on TF-IDF, LDA, and fine-tuned sentence-BERT. Our findings demonstrate that COVID-19 has caused unprecedented destruction of the original knowledge support pattern in the early stages of research (which is at odds with the knowledge support pattern in the general scientific background). The long-term accumulated and non-direct knowledge provides brief support for the COVID-19 investigation. Follow-up research will swiftly replace outdated information with new study findings. The appeal of the scientific community has moved from “return to the past” to “innovative alternatives”. We divide the process into three stages: rearrangement, iteration, and growth. The loss in knowledge support capacity following a disruptive event such as COVID-19 enhances the difficulty of research. However, it cannot be ignored that it has also considerably sped the pace of knowledge production.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujie Zhang & Hongzhen Li & Jingyi Mao & Guoxiu He & Yunhan Yang & Zhuoren Jiang & Yufeng Duan, 2023. "COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4791-4823, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04764-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Chaomei Chen & Diana Hicks, 2004. "Tracing knowledge diffusion," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(2), pages 199-211, February.
    3. Bryan Kelly & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Amit Seru & Matt Taddy, 2021. "Measuring Technological Innovation over the Long Run," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 303-320, September.
    4. Michael Park & Erin Leahey & Russell J. Funk, 2023. "Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7942), pages 138-144, January.
    5. Shir Aviv-Reuven & Ariel Rosenfeld, 2021. "Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6761-6784, August.
    6. Yves Fassin, 2021. "Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5305-5319, June.
    7. Yi Zhang & Xiaojing Cai & Caroline V. Fry & Mengjia Wu & Caroline S. Wagner, 2021. "Topic evolution, disruption and resilience in early COVID-19 research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4225-4253, May.
    8. Erjia Yan, 2016. "Disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion in science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(9), pages 2223-2245, September.
    9. Lin Zhang & Wenjing Zhao & Beibei Sun & Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2020. "How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 747-773, July.
    10. X. Cai & C. V. Fry & C. S. Wagner, 2021. "International collaboration during the COVID-19 crisis: autumn 2020 developments," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3683-3692, April.
    11. ZHAO, Wenjing & Zhang, Lin & Wang, Junling & Wang, Lili, 2022. "How has academia responded to the urgent needs created by COVID-19? – A multi-level global, regional and national analysis," OSF Preprints zbe5c, Center for Open Science.
    12. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer, 2020. "Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCoV literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2695-2726, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rubini, Lauretta & Pollio, Chiara & Barbieri, Elisa & Cattaruzzo, Sebastiano, 2024. "Changing structures in transnational research networks: An analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on China's scientific collaborations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 281-297.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Török, Ádám & Konka, Boglárka & Nagy, Andrea Magda, 2023. "A koronavírus-járvány a közgazdasági szakirodalomban. Egy új határterület tudománymetriai elemzése [The coronavirus pandemic in the economics literature. The scientometric analysis of a new discipl," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 284-304.
    2. Rubini, Lauretta & Pollio, Chiara & Barbieri, Elisa & Cattaruzzo, Sebastiano, 2024. "Changing structures in transnational research networks: An analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on China's scientific collaborations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 281-297.
    3. Breno Santana Santos & Ivanovitch Silva & Luciana Lima & Patricia Takako Endo & Gisliany Alves & Marcel da Câmara Ribeiro-Dantas, 2022. "Discovering temporal scientometric knowledge in COVID-19 scholarly production," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1609-1642, March.
    4. Constantin Bürgi & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2022. "The influence of Covid-19 on publications in economics: bibliometric evidence from five working paper series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5175-5189, September.
    5. Zhao, Yi & Liu, Lifan & Zhang, Chengzhi, 2022. "Is coronavirus-related research becoming more interdisciplinary? A perspective of co-occurrence analysis and diversity measure of scientific articles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Gabriela F. Nane & Nicolas Robinson-Garcia & François Schalkwyk & Daniel Torres-Salinas, 2023. "COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 345-362, January.
    7. Danilo Silva Carvalho & Lucas Lopes Felipe & Priscila Costa Albuquerque & Fabio Zicker & Bruna de Paula Fonseca, 2023. "Leadership and international collaboration on COVID-19 research: reducing the North–South divide?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4689-4705, August.
    8. Yue, Zenghui & Xu, Haiyun & Yuan, Guoting & Pang, Hongshen, 2019. "Modeling study of knowledge diffusion in scientific collaboration networks based on differential dynamics: A case study in graphene field," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 375-391.
    9. Milad Haghani & Pegah Varamini, 2021. "Temporal evolution, most influential studies and sleeping beauties of the coronavirus literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 7005-7050, August.
    10. Jiban K. Pal, 2021. "Visualizing the knowledge outburst in global research on COVID-19," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4173-4193, May.
    11. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Ida Mele, 2022. "Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 6811-6826, December.
    12. Houqiang Yu & Yian Liang & Yinghua Xie, 2024. "Predicting Scientific Breakthroughs Based on Structural Dynamic of Citation Cascades," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Mao, Jin & Liang, Zhentao & Cao, Yujie & Li, Gang, 2020. "Quantifying cross-disciplinary knowledge flow from the perspective of content: Introducing an approach based on knowledge memes," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    14. Yves Fassin, 2021. "Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5305-5319, June.
    15. Rousseau, Ronald & Garcia-Zorita, Carlos & Sanz-Casado, Elías, 2023. "Publications during COVID-19 times: An unexpected overall increase," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    16. Boeing, Philipp & Brandt, Loren & Dai, Ruochen & Lim, Kevin & Peters, Bettina, 2024. "The anatomy of Chinese innovation: Insights on patent quality and ownership," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-016, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Maya M. Durvasula & Sabri Eyuboglu & David M. Ritzwoller, 2024. "Distilling Data from Large Language Models: An Application to Research Productivity Measurement," Papers 2405.08030, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    18. Yi Zhang & Xiaojing Cai & Caroline V. Fry & Mengjia Wu & Caroline S. Wagner, 2021. "Topic evolution, disruption and resilience in early COVID-19 research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4225-4253, May.
    19. Thea Paeffgen, 2022. "Organisational Resilience during COVID-19 Times: A Bibliometric Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Mona Farouk Ali, 2022. "Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3083-3115, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04764-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.