IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v126y2021i6d10.1007_s11192-021-03955-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An NLP-based citation reason analysis using CCRO

Author

Listed:
  • Imran Ihsan

    (Capital University of Science and Technology
    Air University)

  • M. Abdul Qadir

    (Capital University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In recent scientific advances, Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing are the major contributors to classifying documents and extracting information. Classifying citations in different classes have gathered a lot of attention due to the large volume of citations available in different digital libraries. Typical citation classification uses sentiment analysis, where various techniques are applied to citations texts to mainly classify them in “Positive”, “Negative” and “Neutral” sentiments. However, there can be innumerable reasons why an author selects another research for citation. Citations’ Context and Reasons Ontology—CCRO uses a clear scientific method to articulate eight basic reasons for citing by using an iterative process of sentiment analysis, collaborative meanings, and experts' opinions. Using CCRO, this research paper adopts an ontology-based approach to extract citation's reasons and instantiate ontology classes and properties on two different corpora of citation sentences. One corpus of citation sentences is a publicly available dataset, while the other is our own manually curated. The process uses a two-step approach. The first part is an interface to manually annotate each citation text in the selected corpora on CCRO properties. A team of carefully selected annotators has annotated each citation to achieve a high inter-annotator agreement. The second part focuses on the automatic extraction of these reasons. Using Natural Language Processing, Mapping Graph, and Reporting Verb in a citation sentence, citation's reason is extracted and mapped onto a CCRO property. After comparing both manual and automatic mapping, accuracy is calculated. Based on experiments and results, accuracy is calculated for both publicly available and own corpora of citation sentences.

Suggested Citation

  • Imran Ihsan & M. Abdul Qadir, 2021. "An NLP-based citation reason analysis using CCRO," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4769-4791, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03955-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03955-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-021-03955-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-021-03955-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaojun Wan & Fang Liu, 2014. "Are all literature citations equally important? Automatic citation strength estimation and its applications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(9), pages 1929-1938, September.
    2. Zehra Taşkın & Umut Al, 2018. "A content-based citation analysis study based on text categorization," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 335-357, January.
    3. Faiza Qayyum & Muhammad Tanvir Afzal, 2019. "Identification of important citations by exploiting research articles’ metadata and cue-terms from content," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 21-43, January.
    4. Henry Small, 2011. "Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: a preliminary investigation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(2), pages 373-388, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingyang Wang & Jiaqi Zhang & Shijia Jiao & Xiangrong Zhang & Na Zhu & Guangsheng Chen, 2020. "Important citation identification by exploiting the syntactic and contextual information of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2109-2129, December.
    2. Heng Huang & Donghua Zhu & Xuefeng Wang, 2022. "Evaluating scientific impact of publications: combining citation polarity and purpose," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5257-5281, September.
    3. Wang, Shiyun & Mao, Jin & Lu, Kun & Cao, Yujie & Li, Gang, 2021. "Understanding interdisciplinary knowledge integration through citance analysis: A case study on eHealth," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    4. Xiaorui Jiang & Jingqiang Chen, 2023. "Contextualised segment-wise citation function classification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(9), pages 5117-5158, September.
    5. Shengzhi Huang & Jiajia Qian & Yong Huang & Wei Lu & Yi Bu & Jinqing Yang & Qikai Cheng, 2022. "Disclosing the relationship between citation structure and future impact of a publication," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 1025-1042, July.
    6. Faiza Qayyum & Harun Jamil & Naeem Iqbal & DoHyeun Kim & Muhammad Tanvir Afzal, 2022. "Toward potential hybrid features evaluation using MLP-ANN binary classification model to tackle meaningful citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6471-6499, November.
    7. Rey-Long Liu, 2017. "A new bibliographic coupling measure with descriptive capability," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 915-935, February.
    8. Dong-Hui Yang & Xin Li & Xiaoxia Sun & Jie Wan, 2016. "Detecting impact factor manipulation with data mining techniques," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1989-2005, December.
    9. Ding, Ying & Liu, Xiaozhong & Guo, Chun & Cronin, Blaise, 2013. "The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 583-592.
    10. Michel Zitt, 2015. "Meso-level retrieval: IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2223-2245, March.
    11. Naif Radi Aljohani & Ayman Fayoumi & Saeed-Ul Hassan, 2021. "An in-text citation classification predictive model for a scholarly search system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5509-5529, July.
    12. Zhang, Fang & Wu, Shengli, 2020. "Predicting future influence of papers, researchers, and venues in a dynamic academic network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    13. Bai, Xiaomei & Zhang, Fuli & Liu, Jiaying & Xia, Feng, 2023. "Quantifying the impact of scientific collaboration and papers via motif-based heterogeneous networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    14. Kai Li & Jason Rollins & Erjia Yan, 2018. "Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Mingyang Wang & Jiaqi Zhang & Shijia Jiao & Tianyu Zhang, 2019. "Evaluating the impact of citations of articles based on knowledge flow patterns hidden in the citations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Xin An & Xin Sun & Shuo Xu, 2022. "Important citations identification with semi-supervised classification model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6533-6555, November.
    17. Bikun Chen & Dannan Deng & Zhouyan Zhong & Chengzhi Zhang, 2020. "Exploring linguistic characteristics of highly browsed and downloaded academic articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1769-1790, March.
    18. Yu, Dejian & Yan, Zhaoping, 2023. "Main path analysis considering citation structure and content: Case studies in different domains," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    19. Hajar Sotudeh & Mojgan Houshyar, 2018. "Comparing discrimination powers of text and citation-based context types," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 229-251, January.
    20. Kai Nishikawa, 2023. "How and why are citations between disciplines made? A citation context analysis focusing on natural sciences and social sciences and humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2975-2997, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03955-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.