IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v117y2018i2d10.1007_s11192-018-2904-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A semantic-based knowledge fusion model for solution-oriented information network development: a case study in intrusion detection field

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhang

    (UNSW at ADFA)

  • Morteza Saberi

    (UNSW at ADFA)

  • Elizabeth Chang

    (UNSW at ADFA)

Abstract

Building information networks using semantic based techniques to avoid tedious work and to achieve high efficiency has been a long-term goal in the information management world. A great volume of research has focused on developing large scale information networks for general domains to pursue the comprehensiveness and integrity of the information. However, constructing customised information networks containing subject-specific knowledge has been neglected. Such research can potentially return high value in terms of both theoretical and practical contribution. In this paper, a new type of network, solution-oriented information network, is coined that includes research problems and proposed techniques as nodes, and the relationship between them. A lightweight Semantic-based Knowledge Fusion Model (SKFM) is proposed leveraging the power of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Crowdsourcing to construct the proposed information networks using academic papers (knowledge) from Scopus. SKFM relies on NLP in terms of automatic components while Crowdsourcing is initiated when uncertain cases arise. Applying the NLP technique assists to develop a semi-automatic knowledge fusion method for saving effort and time in extracting information from academic papers. Leveraging human power in uncertain cases is to make sure the essential concepts for developing the information networks are extracted reliably and connected correctly. SKFM shows a theoretical contribution in terms of lightweight knowledge extraction and reconstruction framework, as well as practical value by providing solutions proposed in academic papers to address corresponding research issues in subject-specific areas. Experiments have been implemented which have shown promising results. In the research field of intrusion detection, the information of attack types and proposed solutions has been extracted and integrated in a graphic manner with high accuracy and efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhang & Morteza Saberi & Elizabeth Chang, 2018. "A semantic-based knowledge fusion model for solution-oriented information network development: a case study in intrusion detection field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 857-886, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2904-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2904-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2904-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-018-2904-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhuang, Enyu & Chen, Guanrong & Feng, Gang, 2011. "A network model of knowledge accumulation through diffusion and upgrade," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(13), pages 2582-2592.
    2. Henry Small, 1973. "Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(4), pages 265-269, July.
    3. Xing Jiang & Ah-Hwee Tan, 2010. "CRCTOL: A semantic-based domain ontology learning system," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 150-168, January.
    4. Xing Jiang & Ah‐Hwee Tan, 2010. "CRCTOL: A semantic‐based domain ontology learning system," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 150-168, January.
    5. Wen-Ta Chiu & Jing-Shan Huang & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2004. "Bibliometric analysis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related research in the beginning stage," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(1), pages 69-77, September.
    6. Tian, Yangge & Wen, Cheng & Hong, Song, 2008. "Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 65-74.
    7. Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo & Salehi, Hadi & Md Yunus, Melor & Farhadi, Hadi & Fooladi, Masood & Farhadi, Maryam & Ale Ebrahim, Nader, 2013. "A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases," MPRA Paper 46898, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Mar 2013.
    8. Feng Niu & Ce Zhang & Christopher Ré & Jude Shavlik, 2012. "Elementary: Large-Scale Knowledge-Base Construction via Machine Learning and Statistical Inference," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 8(3), pages 42-73, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Zhang & Min Wang & Morteza Saberi & Elizabeth Chang, 2020. "Knowledge fusion through academic articles: a survey of definitions, techniques, applications and challenges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2637-2666, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Zhang & Min Wang & Morteza Saberi & Elizabeth Chang, 2020. "Knowledge fusion through academic articles: a survey of definitions, techniques, applications and challenges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2637-2666, December.
    2. Zhenhua Chen & Laurie A. Schintler, 2023. "Rediscovering regional science: Positioning the field's evolving location in science and society," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 617-642, June.
    3. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    4. Toshiyuki Hasumi & Mei-Shiu Chiu, 2022. "Online mathematics education as bio-eco-techno process: bibliometric analysis using co-authorship and bibliographic coupling," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4631-4654, August.
    5. Yin, Xicheng & Wang, Hongwei & Wang, Wei & Zhu, Kevin, 2020. "Task recommendation in crowdsourcing systems: A bibliometric analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Milad Haghani & Pegah Varamini, 2021. "Temporal evolution, most influential studies and sleeping beauties of the coronavirus literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 7005-7050, August.
    7. Yuan Li & Wilfrid Azan, 2023. "Scientific knowledge production of blockchain: A bibliometric and lexicometric review," Post-Print hal-04180011, HAL.
    8. Shufen Pang & Mazlinawati Abdul Majid & Hadinnapola Appuhamilage Chintha Crishanthi Perera & Mohammad Saydul Islam Sarkar & Jia Ning & Weikang Zhai & Ran Guo & Yuncheng Deng & Haiwen Zhang, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Global Trends on Blue Carbon and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Study from 2012 to 2023," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    9. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud, 2019. "Business Model Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Origins and Trends," Post-Print hal-01918188, HAL.
    10. Hsin-Ning Su & Pei-Chun Lee, 2010. "Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 65-79, October.
    11. Fabíola Kaczam & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk & Gil Eduardo Guimaraes & Gilnei Luiz Moura & Wesley Vieira Silva & Claudimar Pereira Veiga, 2022. "Establishment of a typology for startups 4.0," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 649-680, April.
    12. Sáez-Ortuño, Laura & Forgas-Coll, Santiago & Huertas-Garcia, Ruben & Sánchez-García, Javier, 2023. "What's on the horizon? A bibliometric analysis of personal data collection methods on social networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Su, Hsin-Ning & Lee, Pei-Chun, 2012. "Framing the structure of global open innovation research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 202-216.
    14. Yanto Chandra, 2018. "Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    16. Guan-Can Yang & Gang Li & Chun-Ya Li & Yun-Hua Zhao & Jing Zhang & Tong Liu & Dar-Zen Chen & Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2015. "Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1319-1346, December.
    17. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    19. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    20. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2904-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.