IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v115y2018i3d10.1007_s11192-018-2729-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: gender studies can do better

Author

Listed:
  • Guy Madison

    (Umeå University)

  • Therese Söderlund

    (Umeå University)

Abstract

The field of gender studies has faced criticism for poor scholarship and methodology, both from within and outside academia. Here, we compare indicators of scientific quality across three samples of peer-reviewed journal articles with more, less and no gender perspective, on the assumption that gender studies tend to apply a gender perspective. The statements in the articles were content-analysed with respect to subject matter, their level of support in surrounding text, and other indicators of scientific quality. The higher the level of gender perspective, the lower was the scientific quality for seven out of nine indicators. Support was higher for the no gender perspective group, but did not differ across the two higher levels. We suggest that the impact of the field can be increased by implementing established research methods employed in other disciplines, especially in terms of bringing about desired social and societal change.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy Madison & Therese Söderlund, 2018. "Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: gender studies can do better," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1161-1183, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2729-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2729-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2729-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-018-2729-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Therese Söderlund & Guy Madison, 2017. "Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of Gender studies and the other social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 1093-1109, August.
    2. Therese Söderlund & Guy Madison, 2015. "Characteristics of gender studies publications: a bibliometric analysis based on a Swedish population database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1347-1387, December.
    3. Guy Madison & Therese Söderlund, 2016. "Can gender studies be studied? Reply to comments on Söderlund and Madison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 329-335, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Lykke, 2018. "Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 655-666, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Lykke, 2018. "Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 655-666, October.
    2. Aleksandra Cislak & Magdalena Formanowicz & Tamar Saguy, 2018. "Bias against research on gender bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 189-200, April.
    3. Stern, Charlotta & Madison, Guy, 2022. "Sex differences and occupational choice Theorizing for policy informed by behavioral science✰," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 694-702.
    4. Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen & Samile Andréa de Souza Vanz, 2023. "The development of Brazilian women’s and gender studies: a bibliometric diagnosis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 227-261, January.
    5. Caynnã Santos & Rosa Monteiro & Mónica Lopes & Monise Martinez & Virgínia Ferreira, 2023. "From Late Bloomer to Booming: A Bibliometric Analysis of Women’s, Gender, and Feminist Studies in Portugal," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Shang, Yuanyuan & Sivertsen, Gunnar & Cao, Zhe & Zhang, Lin, 2021. "Gender differences in research focused on the Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality," SocArXiv 3fapz, Center for Open Science.
    7. Guy Madison & Knut Sundell, 2022. "Numbers of publications and citations for researchers in fields pertinent to the social services: a comparison of peer-reviewed journal publications across six disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 6029-6046, October.
    8. Roberta Ruggieri & Fabrizio Pecoraro & Daniela Luzi, 2021. "An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1647-1673, February.
    9. Silje Lundgren & Margrit Shildrick & David Lawrence, 2015. "Rethinking bibliometric data concerning gender studies: a response to Söderlund and Madison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1389-1398, December.
    10. Guy Madison & Therese Söderlund, 2016. "Can gender studies be studied? Reply to comments on Söderlund and Madison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 329-335, July.
    11. Therese Söderlund & Guy Madison, 2017. "Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of Gender studies and the other social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 1093-1109, August.
    12. Yuanyuan Shang & Gunnar Sivertsen & Zhe Cao & Lin Zhang, 2022. "Gender differences among first authors in research focused on the Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4769-4796, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2729-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.