IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v112y2017i2d10.1007_s11192-017-2407-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of Gender studies and the other social sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Therese Söderlund

    (Umeå University)

  • Guy Madison

    (Umeå University)

Abstract

Gender studies (GS) has been challenged on epistemological grounds. Here, we compare samples of peer-reviewed academic journal publications written by GS authors and authors from closely related disciplines in the social sciences. The material consisted of 2805 statements from 36 peer-reviewed journal articles, sampled from the Swedish Gender Studies List, which covers >12,000 publications. Each statement was coded as expressing a lack of any of three aspects of objectivity: Bias, Normativity, or Political activism, or as considering any of four realms of explanation for the behaviours or phenomena under study: Biology/genetics, Individual/group differences, Environment/culture, or Societal institutions. Statements in GS publications did to a greater extent express bias and normativity, but not political activism. They did also to a greater extent consider cultural, environmental, social, and societal realms of explanation, and to a lesser extent biological and individual differences explanations.

Suggested Citation

  • Therese Söderlund & Guy Madison, 2017. "Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of Gender studies and the other social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 1093-1109, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2407-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2407-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2407-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-017-2407-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Therese Söderlund & Guy Madison, 2015. "Characteristics of gender studies publications: a bibliometric analysis based on a Swedish population database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1347-1387, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Lykke, 2018. "Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 655-666, October.
    2. Stern, Charlotta & Madison, Guy, 2022. "Sex differences and occupational choice Theorizing for policy informed by behavioral science✰," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 694-702.
    3. Guy Madison & Therese Söderlund, 2018. "Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: gender studies can do better," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1161-1183, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen & Samile Andréa de Souza Vanz, 2023. "The development of Brazilian women’s and gender studies: a bibliometric diagnosis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 227-261, January.
    2. Caynnã Santos & Rosa Monteiro & Mónica Lopes & Monise Martinez & Virgínia Ferreira, 2023. "From Late Bloomer to Booming: A Bibliometric Analysis of Women’s, Gender, and Feminist Studies in Portugal," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Shang, Yuanyuan & Sivertsen, Gunnar & Cao, Zhe & Zhang, Lin, 2021. "Gender differences in research focused on the Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality," SocArXiv 3fapz, Center for Open Science.
    4. Guy Madison & Knut Sundell, 2022. "Numbers of publications and citations for researchers in fields pertinent to the social services: a comparison of peer-reviewed journal publications across six disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 6029-6046, October.
    5. Guy Madison & Therese Söderlund, 2018. "Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: gender studies can do better," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1161-1183, June.
    6. Roberta Ruggieri & Fabrizio Pecoraro & Daniela Luzi, 2021. "An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1647-1673, February.
    7. Aleksandra Cislak & Magdalena Formanowicz & Tamar Saguy, 2018. "Bias against research on gender bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 189-200, April.
    8. Silje Lundgren & Margrit Shildrick & David Lawrence, 2015. "Rethinking bibliometric data concerning gender studies: a response to Söderlund and Madison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1389-1398, December.
    9. Guy Madison & Therese Söderlund, 2016. "Can gender studies be studied? Reply to comments on Söderlund and Madison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 329-335, July.
    10. Nina Lykke, 2018. "Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 655-666, October.
    11. Yuanyuan Shang & Gunnar Sivertsen & Zhe Cao & Lin Zhang, 2022. "Gender differences among first authors in research focused on the Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4769-4796, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2407-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.