IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v111y2017i1d10.1007_s11192-017-2257-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Hottenrott

    (Technische Universität München
    Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)
    K.U. Leuven)

  • Cornelia Lawson

    (University of Bath
    Collegio Carlo Alberto)

Abstract

This study sheds light on the unexplored phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations using scientific publications. Institutional affiliations are important in the organisation and governance of science. Multiple affiliations may alter the traditional framework of academic employment and careers and may require a reappraisal of institutional assessment based on research outcomes of affiliated staff. Results for authors in three major science and technology nations (Germany, Japan and the UK) and in three fields (biology, chemistry, and engineering) show that multiple affiliations have at least doubled over the past few years. The analysis proposes three major types of multiple affiliations that depend on the structure of the research sector and its international openness. Highly internationalised and higher education-centred affiliations are most common for researchers in the UK whereas Germany and Japan have stronger cross-sector affiliation patterns. International multiple affiliations are, however, still more common in Germany compared to Japan which is characterised by a domestic, cross-sector affiliation distribution. Moreover, multiple affiliation authors are more often found on high impact papers, particularly in the case of authors from Japan and Germany in the fields of biology and chemistry.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Hottenrott & Cornelia Lawson, 2017. "A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 285-295, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:111:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2257-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Reza Safaei & Marjan Goodarzi & Omid Mahian & Mahidzal Dahari & Somchai Wongwises, 2016. "A survey of using multiple affiliations by scholars in scientific articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 317-318, April.
    2. Ana Fernández-Zubieta & Aldo Geuna & Cornelia Lawson, 2016. "Productivity pay-offs from academic mobility: should I stay or should I go?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(1), pages 91-114.
    3. Katz, J. Sylvan & Martin, Ben R., 1997. "What is research collaboration?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Lee, You-Na & Walsh, John P. & Wang, Jian, 2015. "Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 684-697.
    5. Bryn Lander, 2015. "Proximity at a distance: the role of institutional and geographical proximities in Vancouver’s infection and immunity research collaborations," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 575-596, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanna Hottenrott & Michael E. Rose & Cornelia Lawson, 2021. "The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 1039-1058, August.
    2. Maria Victoria Guzmán-Sánchez & Maybel Piñón-Lora & Elio Atenógenes Villaseñor-García & José Luis Jiménez-Andrade & Humberto Carrillo-Calvet, 2018. "Characterization of the Cuban biopharmaceutical industry from collaborative networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1533-1548, June.
    3. Huang, Mu-Hsuan & Chang, Yu-Wei, 2018. "Multi-institutional authorship in genetics and high-energy physics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 549-558.
    4. Ejermo, Olof & Sofer, Yotam, 2024. "When colleges graduate: Micro-level effects on publications and scientific organization," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    5. Nataliya Matveeva & Ivan Sterligov & Maria Yudkevich, 2019. "The Russian University Excellence Initiative: Is It Really Excellence That Is Promoted?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 49/EDU/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Hans Pohl & Jason E. Lane, 2018. "Research contributions of international branch campuses to the scientific wealth of academically developing countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1719-1734, September.
    7. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Yi Bu & Nicolás Robinson-García & Rodrigo Costas & Cassidy R. Sugimoto, 2018. "Travel bans and scientific mobility: utility of asymmetry and affinity indexes to inform science policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 569-590, July.
    8. Hanna Hottenrott & Cornelia Lawson, 2022. "What is behind multiple institutional affiliations in academia?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 382-402.
    9. Gianluca Fabiano & Andrea Marcellusi & Giampiero Favato, 2020. "Public–private contribution to biopharmaceutical discoveries: a bibliometric analysis of biomedical research in UK," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 153-168, July.
    10. Moustafa, Khaled, 2020. "Octopus affiliations," arabixiv.org 2wz96, Center for Open Science.
    11. Alfredo Yegros-Yegros & Giovanna Capponi & Koen Frenken, 2021. "A spatial-institutional analysis of researchers with multiple affiliations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Hsuan-I Liu & Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2022. "Research contribution pattern analysis of multinational authorship papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1783-1800, April.
    13. Kuan, Chung-Huei & Chen, Dar-Zen & Huang, Mu-Hsuan, 2024. "Dubious cross-national affiliations obscure the assessment of international research collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    14. Kyungkook Kim & Keun Tae Cho, 2021. "A Review of Global Collaboration on COVID-19 Research during the Pandemic in 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammadi, Ali & Broström, Anders & Franzoni, Chiara, 2015. "Work Force Composition and Innovation: How Diversity in Employees’ Ethnical and Disciplinary Backgrounds Facilitates Knowledge Re-combination," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 413, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    2. Thomas Bolli & Jörg Schläpfer, 2015. "Job mobility, peer effects, and research productivity in economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 629-650, September.
    3. Liu, Meijun & Hu, Xiao, 2021. "Will collaborators make scientists move? A Generalized Propensity Score analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    4. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2021. "Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4005-4037, May.
    5. Dongqing Lyu & Kaile Gong & Xuanmin Ruan & Ying Cheng & Jiang Li, 2021. "Does research collaboration influence the “disruption” of articles? Evidence from neurosciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 287-303, January.
    6. Claudia Werker & Vladimir Korzinov & Scott Cunningham, 2019. "Formation and output of collaborations: the role of proximity in German nanotechnology," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 697-719, April.
    7. Scellato, Giuseppe & Franzoni, Chiara & Stephan, Paula, 2015. "Migrant scientists and international networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 108-120.
    8. Meijun Liu & Yi Bu & Chongyan Chen & Jian Xu & Daifeng Li & Yan Leng & Richard B. Freeman & Eric T. Meyer & Wonjin Yoon & Mujeen Sung & Minbyul Jeong & Jinhyuk Lee & Jaewoo Kang & Chao Min & Min Song , 2022. "Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty: Evidence from COVID‐19," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1065-1078, August.
    9. Liu, Meijun & Jaiswal, Ajay & Bu, Yi & Min, Chao & Yang, Sijie & Liu, Zhibo & Acuña, Daniel & Ding, Ying, 2022. "Team formation and team impact: The balance between team freshness and repeat collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    10. D’Ippolito, Beatrice & Rüling, Charles-Clemens, 2019. "Research collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1282-1296.
    11. Wagner, Caroline S. & Whetsell, Travis A. & Mukherjee, Satyam, 2019. "International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1260-1270.
    12. Hartwig, Jochen, 2015. "Structural change, aggregate demand and employment dynamics in the OECD, 1970–2010," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 36-45.
    13. Bryan Stephens & Jonathon N. Cummings, 2021. "Knowledge creation through collaboration: The role of shared institutional affiliations and physical proximity," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(11), pages 1337-1353, November.
    14. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2020. "Research leadership flow determinants and the role of proximity in research collaborations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1341-1356, November.
    15. Wang, Jian, 2016. "Knowledge creation in collaboration networks: Effects of tie configuration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 68-80.
    16. Belkhouja, Mustapha & Fattoum, Senda & Yoon, Hyungseok (David), 2021. "Does greater diversification increase individual productivity? The moderating effect of attention allocation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    17. Walsh, John P. & Lee, You-Na & Nagaoka, Sadao, 2016. "Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1660-1671.
    18. Yaqub, Ohid, 2018. "Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 169-179.
    19. Belkhouja, Mustapha & Yoon, Hyungseok (David), 2018. "How does openness influence the impact of a scholar’s research? An analysis of business scholars’ citations over their careers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 2037-2047.
    20. Krammer, Sorin M.S. & Belkouja, Mustapha & Yoon, David, 2019. "Research performance of teams in Business and Management: The impact of team size, knowledge diversity and international diversity," MPRA Paper 104548, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Jun 2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SCI; Multiple affiliations; Dual appointment; International collaboration; Science-industry collaboration; High-impact research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • J45 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Public Sector Labor Markets
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:111:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2257-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.