IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v102y2015i2d10.1007_s11192-014-1352-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the CE/BCE notation becoming a standard in scholarly literature?

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Cavacini

    (University of Milan)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Cavacini, 2015. "Is the CE/BCE notation becoming a standard in scholarly literature?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1661-1668, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1352-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1352-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-014-1352-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-014-1352-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolin Michels & Ulrich Schmoch, 2012. "The growth of science and database coverage," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 831-846, December.
    2. Guillaume Cabanac, 2014. "Extracting and quantifying eponyms in full-text articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1631-1645, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Violaine Tatry & Dominique Fournier & Benoît Jeannequin & Françoise Dosba, 2014. "EU27 and USA leadership in fruit and vegetable research: a bibliometric study from 2000 to 2009," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2207-2222, March.
    2. Kroll, Henning & Berghäuser, Hendrik & Blind, Knut & Neuhäusler, Peter & Scheifele, Fabian & Thielmann, Axel & Wydra, Sven, 2022. "Schlüsseltechnologien," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    3. Eugenio Petrovich & Sander Verhaegh & Gregor Bös & Claudia Cristalli & Fons Dewulf & Ties Gemert & Nina IJdens, 2024. "Bibliometrics beyond citations: introducing mention extraction and analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5731-5768, September.
    4. Fang Liu, 2023. "Retrieval strategy and possible explanations for the abnormal growth of research publications: re-evaluating a bibliometric analysis of climate change," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 853-859, January.
    5. Beckert, Bernd & Buschak, Daniela & Graf, Birgit & Hägele, Martin & Jäger, Angela & Moll, Cornelius & Schmoch, Ulrich & Wydra, Sven, 2016. "Automatisierung und Robotik-Systeme," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 11-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    6. Valderrama-Zurian, J.C. & Melero-Fuentes, D. & Aleixandre-Benavent, R., 2019. "Origin, characteristics, predominance and conceptual networks of eponyms in the bibliometric literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 434-448.
    7. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib & Panagiotis Tsigaris, 2020. "Spam emails in academia: issues and costs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 1171-1188, February.
    8. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    9. Robert Lehmann & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2017. "An Elo ranking for economics journals," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2282-2291.
    10. Yin, Yian & Wang, Dashun, 2017. "The time dimension of science: Connecting the past to the future," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 608-621.
    11. Shaen Corbet & Les Oxley, 2023. "Investigating the Academic Response to Cryptocurrencies: Insights from Research Diversification as Separated by Journal Ranking," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 3(4), pages 487-528, September.
    12. Corbet, Shaen & Dowling, Michael & Gao, Xiangyun & Huang, Shupei & Lucey, Brian & Vigne, Samuel A., 2019. "An analysis of the intellectual structure of research on the financial economics of precious metals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Marco Pautasso, 2012. "Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(12), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Henning Kroll & Peter Neuhäusler, 2022. "“Formal and informal networkedness among German Academics”: exploring the role of conferences and co-publications in scientific performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6431-6452, November.
    15. Yan, Meilan & Li, Youwei & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Vigne, Samuel A. & Zhang, Dalu, 2024. "A comparative and conceptual intellectual study of environmental topic in economic and finance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Lutz Bornmann & Alexander Butz & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2018. "What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(6), pages 659-675, February.
    17. Kroll, Henning & Frietsch, Rainer, 2022. "China's changing role in global science and innovation," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 73, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    18. Teemu Makkonen & Timo Mitze, 2016. "Scientific collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 1193-1215, March.
    19. Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan, 2013. "A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 833-849.
    20. Enrique Arbeláez-Cortés & Andrés R. Acosta-Galvis & Carlos DoNascimiento & Diana Espitia-Reina & Arturo González-Alvarado & Claudia A. Medina, 2017. "Knowledge linked to museum specimen vouchers: measuring scientific production from a major biological collection in Colombia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1323-1341, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1352-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.