IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2422-d1609041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservation Biodiversity in Arid Areas: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Voichita Timis-Gansac

    (Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea, 26 General Magheru Street, 410048 Oradea, Romania)

  • Lucian Dinca

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Eroilor 128, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Cristinel Constandache

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Eroilor 128, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Gabriel Murariu

    (Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Environmental, Dunarea de Jos University Galati, Domneasca Street No. 47, 800008 Galati, Romania)

  • Gabriel Cheregi

    (Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea, 26 General Magheru Street, 410048 Oradea, Romania)

  • Claudia Simona Cleopatra Timofte

    (Faculty of Law, University of Oradea, 26 General Magheru Sreet, 410048 Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

Drylands cover a vast area, and biodiversity conservation in these regions represents a major challenge. A bibliometric study of published research highlighted several key aspects, including publication types, research fields, years of publication, contributing countries, institutions, languages, journals, publishers, authors, and frequently used keywords. The analysis also included plants related to biodiversity conservation in arid areas, animals related to biodiversity conservation in arid areas, and causes of biodiversity decline in arid regions, effects of biodiversity loss in these regions, and restoration methods aimed at improving biodiversity conservation in arid areas. A total of 947 publications were identified, starting from 1994, authored by researchers from 99 countries, primarily from Australia, the USA, China, Spain, and South Africa, and published in 345 journals, with the most prominent being Journal of Arid Environments, Biodiversity and Conservation, and Biological Conservation. The most commonly appearing keywords included biodiversity, conservation, diversity, vegetation, and patterns, with recent years showing an increased use of terms related to the causes and effects of aridification: climate change, land use, and ecosystem services. The causes of biodiversity loss in drylands are primarily linked to human activities and climatic changes, while the effects impact the entire ecosystem. Methods to improve biodiversity include traditional agroforestry systems, tree plantations and other plant species, grazing management, and other approaches. Combined actions among stakeholders and ecologically appropriate nature-based solutions are also recommended. Improvements in conservation biodiversity in arid areas are very important also for achieving the sustainability goals in these areas. However, numerous aspects of this topic remain to be studied in greater detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Voichita Timis-Gansac & Lucian Dinca & Cristinel Constandache & Gabriel Murariu & Gabriel Cheregi & Claudia Simona Cleopatra Timofte, 2025. "Conservation Biodiversity in Arid Areas: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2422-:d:1609041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2422/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2422/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salvador Carranza & Meritxell Xipell & Pedro Tarroso & Andrew Gardner & Edwin Nicholas Arnold & Michael D Robinson & Marc Simó-Riudalbas & Raquel Vasconcelos & Philip de Pous & Fèlix Amat & Jiří Šmíd , 2018. "Diversity, distribution and conservation of the terrestrial reptiles of Oman (Sauropsida, Squamata)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, February.
    2. Diêgo P. Costa & Stefanie M. Herrmann & Rodrigo N. Vasconcelos & Soltan Galano Duverger & Washinton J. S. Franca Rocha & Elaine C. B. Cambuí & Jocimara S. B. Lobão & Ellen M. R. Santos & Jefferson Fer, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Land Degradation Studies in Drylands Using Remote Sensing Data: A 40-Year Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Carolin Michels & Ulrich Schmoch, 2012. "The growth of science and database coverage," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 831-846, December.
    4. Christine L. Borgman & Ronald E. Rice, 1992. "The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 43(6), pages 397-411, July.
    5. Wen-Ta Chiu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2007. "Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 3-17, October.
    6. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    7. Mark William Neff & Elizabeth A. Corley, 2009. "35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 657-682, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maribel Vega-Arce & Gonzalo Salas & Gastón Núñez-Ulloa & Cristián Pinto-Cortez & Ivelisse Torres Fernandez & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Research performance and trends in child sexual abuse research: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1505-1525, December.
    2. Colton Brehm & Astrid Layton, 2021. "Nestedness of eco‐industrial networks: Exploring linkage distribution to promote sustainable industrial growth," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 205-218, February.
    3. Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Lu Zhang & Chuyu Xia & Er Yu & Jiayu Yang, 2022. "Carbon Metabolism in Urban “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Based on Ecological Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Yongjun Zhu & Erjia Yan, 2015. "Dynamic subfield analysis of disciplines: an examination of the trading impact and knowledge diffusion patterns of computer science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 335-359, July.
    5. Yi-Ming Guo & Zhen-Ling Huang & Ji Guo & Hua Li & Xing-Rong Guo & Mpeoane Judith Nkeli, 2019. "Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Yu-Wei Chang & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Chiao-Wen Lin, 2015. "Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2071-2087, December.
    7. Marie-Violaine Tatry & Dominique Fournier & Benoît Jeannequin & Françoise Dosba, 2014. "EU27 and USA leadership in fruit and vegetable research: a bibliometric study from 2000 to 2009," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2207-2222, March.
    8. Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    9. Nikita Jain & Deepali Virmani & Ajith Abraham, 2021. "Tsunami in the last 15 years: a bibliometric analysis with a detailed overview and future directions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 139-172, March.
    10. Bhavna Thawani & Tushar Panigrahi & Meena Bhatia, 2024. "Eleven years of integrated reporting: a bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 666-684, December.
    11. Pan, Xuelian & Yan, Erjia & Cui, Ming & Hua, Weina, 2018. "Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 481-493.
    12. Qing Ji & Xiaoping Pang & Xi Zhao, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on Antarctica during 1993–2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1925-1939, December.
    13. Vasile-Petru Hategan, 2021. "Promoting the Eco-Dialogue through Eco-Philosophy for Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Janghyeok Yoon & Sungchul Choi & Kwangsoo Kim, 2011. "Invention property-function network analysis of patents: a case of silicon-based thin film solar cells," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 687-703, March.
    15. Kroll, Henning & Berghäuser, Hendrik & Blind, Knut & Neuhäusler, Peter & Scheifele, Fabian & Thielmann, Axel & Wydra, Sven, 2022. "Schlüsseltechnologien," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    16. Jiang Tan & Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1473-1490, February.
    17. Saeed-Ul Hassan & Iqra Safder & Anam Akram & Faisal Kamiran, 2018. "A novel machine-learning approach to measuring scientific knowledge flows using citation context analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 973-996, August.
    18. Bulent Ozel, 2012. "Collaboration structure and knowledge diffusion in Turkish management academia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(1), pages 183-206, October.
    19. Nan Zhang & Shanshan Wan & Peiling Wang & Peng Zhang & Qiang Wu, 2018. "A bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers in the field of Economics and Business based on the Essential Science Indicators database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1039-1053, August.
    20. Yang Cao & Sixing Zhou & Guobin Wang, 2013. "A bibliometric analysis of global laparoscopy research trends during 1997–2011," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(3), pages 717-730, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2422-:d:1609041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.