IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v16y2022i2d10.1007_s11846-021-00456-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pursuit of disruptive innovations by middle managers: effects of the firm’s customer orientation and mastery achievement goals

Author

Listed:
  • Fawad Sadiq

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

  • Tasweer Hussain

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

  • Afshan Naseem

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

  • Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

  • Ahsan Ali Syed

    (POF Hospital)

Abstract

Disruptive innovation (DI) poses a significant challenge for firms due to their uncertain nature and unique diffusion patterns before entering the market. A proactive strategy to address the issue of DI can turn a potential disruption into a business opportunity. To implement such an aggressive approach, firms should enhance their intrapreneurship capabilities through middle managers’ disruptive innovation activities (DIA). However, research on managing and promoting DI by middle managers is still at a nascent stage. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap in the literature by examining the influence of a firm’s customer orientation (i.e., mainstream and emerging) and middle managers’ mastery achievement goals on their DIA. It analyses the direct and interaction effects of firms’ customer orientation and middle managers’ achievement goals on their DIA. The data from 337 middle managers are analyzed in structural equation modelling. The results indicate that managers’ perception regarding their firm as ‘emerging customer orientated’ positively influences their DIA. Perception regarding the firm as ‘mainstream customer orientated’ negatively influences. Mastery achievement goals of middle managers positively impact their DIA. The interaction of emerging customer orientation and mastery achievement goals significantly influence middle managers’ DIA. Later, interviews were conducted to elaborate on the survey data results, which complemented the findings and provided further insight into the identified effects. These results provide a comprehensive understanding of middle managers' strategic role in nurturing DI in an organizational setting and contributing to the theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Fawad Sadiq & Tasweer Hussain & Afshan Naseem & Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza & Ahsan Ali Syed, 2022. "The pursuit of disruptive innovations by middle managers: effects of the firm’s customer orientation and mastery achievement goals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 551-581, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:16:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-021-00456-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-021-00456-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-021-00456-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-021-00456-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hornsby, Jeffrey S. & Kuratko, Donald F. & Zahra, Shaker A., 2002. "Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 253-273, May.
    2. Jeremy Hutchison-Krupat & Raul O. Chao, 2014. "Tolerance for Failure and Incentives for Collaborative Innovation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(8), pages 1265-1285, August.
    3. Fawad Sadiq & Tasweer Hussain, 2018. "Exploring the Role of Managers in Nurturing Disruptive Innovations," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(4), pages 103-120, December.
    4. Sascha Kraus & Norat Roig-Tierno & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2019. "Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 519-528, June.
    5. Erwin Danneels, 2003. "Tight–loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 559-576, June.
    6. Wael Bakhit, 2016. "Impact of Disruptive Innovations on Mobile Telecom Industry in Lebanon," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(3), pages 80-94, April.
    7. Tom J. M. Mom & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 812-828, August.
    8. Ayoub Yousefi, 2011. "The impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: evidence from developed and developing countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 581-596, November.
    9. Lori Rosenkopf & Atul Nerkar, 2001. "Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 287-306, April.
    10. Donald F. Kuratko & R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Jeffrey S. Hornsby, 2005. "A Model of Middle–Level Managers’ Entrepreneurial Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(6), pages 699-716, November.
    11. Cristina B. Gibson & Julian Birkinshaw & Dana McDaniel Sumpter & Tina Ambos, 2019. "The Hierarchical Erosion Effect: A New Perspective on Perceptual Differences and Business Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(8), pages 1713-1747, December.
    12. Steven W. Floyd & Bill Wooldridge, 1997. "Middle Management’s Strategic Influence and Organizational Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 465-485, May.
    13. Levinthal, Daniel & March, James G., 1981. "A model of adaptive organizational search," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 307-333, December.
    14. Danny Miller, 2015. "A Downside to the Entrepreneurial Personality?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(1), pages 1-8, January.
    15. Jansen Van Rensburg, Mari & Davis, Annemarie & Venter, Peet, 2014. "Making strategy work: The role of the middle manager," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 165-186, March.
    16. Helene Tenzer & Philip Yang, 2019. "The Impact Of Organisational Support And Individual Achievement Orientation On Creative Deviance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-28, April.
    17. Clayton M. Christensen & Rory McDonald & Elizabeth J. Altman & Jonathan E. Palmer, 2018. "Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1043-1078, November.
    18. Covin, Jeffrey G. & Rigtering, J.P. Coen & Hughes, Mathew & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2020. "Individual and team entrepreneurial orientation: Scale development and configurations for success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-12.
    19. Arun Kumaraswamy & Raghu Garud & Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari, 2018. "Perspectives on Disruptive Innovations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1025-1042, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    2. Andreea N. Kiss & Dirk Libaers & Pamela S. Barr & Tang Wang & Miles A. Zachary, 2020. "CEO cognitive flexibility, information search, and organizational ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2200-2233, December.
    3. Luís Marques & João J. Ferreira & Sascha Kraus & Raj Mahto, 2022. "Organizational Antecedents of Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Quantitative Investigation from Portugal," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(3), pages 483-513, November.
    4. Li, Peng-Yu, 2018. "Top management team characteristics and firm internationalization: The moderating role of the size of middle managers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 125-138.
    5. Daniel R. Clark & Robert J. Pidduck & G. T. Lumpkin & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2024. "Is It Okay to Study Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) at the Individual Level? Yes!," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 349-391, January.
    6. Murat Tarakci & Nüfer Yasin Ateş & Steven W. Floyd & Yoojung Ahn & Bill Wooldridge, 2018. "Performance feedback and middle managers’ divergent strategic behavior: The roles of social comparisons and organizational identification," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1139-1162, April.
    7. Mom, T.J.M., 2019. "Strategic Growth and Implementation: Thriving in a Disruptive Landscape," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA 2019-076-S&E, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    8. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    9. Burcharth, Ana Luiza Lara de Araújo & Lettl, Christopher & Ulhøi, John Parm, 2015. "Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 269-284.
    10. Patzelt, Holger & Gartzia, Leire & Wolfe, Marcus T. & Shepherd, Dean A., 2021. "Managing negative emotions from entrepreneurial project failure: When and how does supportive leadership help employees?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    11. Jatinder S. Sidhu & Harry R. Commandeur & Henk W. Volberda, 2007. "The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation: Value of Supply, Demand, and Spatial Search for Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 20-38, February.
    12. Ljiljana Kontic & Nada Zivanovic & Darko Popadic & Vlada Zivanovic, "undated". "Economic recovery thought corporate entrepreneurship strategy: The case of Serbia," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202205, Reviewsep.
    13. Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M. & Beerkens, B.E. & Duysters, G.M., 2003. "Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology-based alliance networks," Working Papers 03.22, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    14. Gatti, Corrado & Volpe, Loredana & Vagnani, Gianluca, 2015. "Interdependence among productive activities: Implications for exploration and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 711-722.
    15. Tiziana Callari & Corinne Bieder & Barry Kirwan, 2019. "What is it like for a middle manager to take safety into account? Practices and challenges," Post-Print hal-01935746, HAL.
    16. Sunkee Lee, 2019. "Learning-by-Moving: Can Reconfiguring Spatial Proximity Between Organizational Members Promote Individual-level Exploration?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 467-488, May.
    17. Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar & Mike Wright & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2018. "Sector-Based Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Promise of Sector Studies in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-23, January.
    18. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus & Juan F. Martínez-Pérez, 0. "Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: the emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    19. Baruch Lev & Suresh Radhakrishnan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2021. "Earnings Component Volatilities: Capital Versus R&D Expenditures," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1475-1492, May.
    20. Joshua S. Gans & Michael Kearney & Erin L. Scott & Scott Stern, 2021. "Choosing Technology: An Entrepreneurial Strategy Approach," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 39-53, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:16:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-021-00456-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.