IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v12y2022i2d10.1134_s2079970522020204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Railway Regionalization of Russia by Long-Distance Passenger Transport

Author

Listed:
  • K. V. Samburov

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

— This article presents a grid of districts of Russia based on catchment areas of certain transport hubs that provide long-distance passenger rail transport services. It is shown that the existing methods of identifying catchment areas of a particular hub are not suitable for analyzing rail transport. To solve the problem of transport regionalization, an original methodology for identifying catchment areas of passenger railway hubs and points is proposed and then used to identify the catchment areas of 2065 long-distance railway hubs and points on 2016 data. The study uses second-level territorial-administrative units (municipal districts and urban okrugs) as the elementary territorial unit. A total of 488 passenger railway districts that include transport facilities located in the catchment area of the district’s central hub are delineated on the territory of Russia. Key parameters of these districts and their passenger traffic structures are studied. The districts are divided into four types based on an analysis of passenger traffic patterns within them: simple (168 districts), complex monocentric (240 districts), complex linear (59 districts), and complex polycentric (21 districts). The possibilities of using the constructed grid of districts for analyzing the spatial structure of the long-distance passenger railway complex are considered. The main disadvantages of the methodology, associated with defects in the source statistical data as well as assumptions made within the study, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • K. V. Samburov, 2022. "Railway Regionalization of Russia by Long-Distance Passenger Transport," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 168-176, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:12:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1134_s2079970522020204
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522020204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970522020204
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970522020204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basar, Gözen & Bhat, Chandra, 2004. "A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: an application to the San Francisco Bay Area," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 889-904, December.
    2. Gao, Yi, 2020. "Estimating the sensitivity of small airport catchments to competition from larger airports: A case study in Indiana," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Marcus Young & Simon Blainey, 2018. "Railway station choice modelling: a review of methods and evidence," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 232-251, March.
    4. Paliska, Dejan & Drobne, Samo & Borruso, Giuseppe & Gardina, Massimo & Fabjan, Daša, 2016. "Passengers' airport choice and airports' catchment area analysis in cross-border Upper Adriatic multi-airport region," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 143-154.
    5. A. S. Neretin & M. V. Zotova & A. I. Lomakina & S. A. Tarkhov, 2020. "Transport Connectivity and Development of Russia’s Eastern Regions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 56-70, January.
    6. Debrezion, Ghebreegziabiher & Pels, Eric & Rietveld, Piet, 2009. "Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 270-283, January.
    7. A. A. Romashina, 2021. "How Express Trains from Moscow Affect Population Mobility," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 61-70, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zijlstra, Toon, 2020. "A border effect in airport choice: Evidence from Western Europe," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Kristoffersson, Ida & Berglund , Svante, 2020. "Modelling connection trips to long-distance travel : state-of-the-art and directions for future research," Papers 2020:5, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    3. Yirgu, Kaleab Woldeyohannes & Kim, Amy M., 2024. "Airport choices and resulting catchments in the U.S. Midwest," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Wang, Sen & Kong, Ningning Nicole & Gao, Yi, 2024. "Use mobile location data to infer airport catchment areas and calibrate Huff gravity model in the New York metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Sun, Xiaoqian & Zheng, Changhong & Chen, Xinyue & Wandelt, Sebastian, 2024. "Multiple airport regions: A review of concepts, insights and challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Sanko, Nobuhiro, 2020. "Activity-end access/egress modal choices between stations and campuses located on a hillside," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Weliwitiya, Hesara & Rose, Geoffrey & Johnson, Marilyn, 2019. "Bicycle train intermodality: Effects of demography, station characteristics and the built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 395-404.
    8. Kunbo Shi & Long Cheng & Jonas De Vos & Yongchun Yang & Wanpeng Cao & Frank Witlox, 2021. "How does purchasing intangible services online influence the travel to consume these services? A focus on a Chinese context," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2605-2625, October.
    9. Hasnine, Md Sami & Graovac, Ana & Camargo, Felipe & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2019. "A random utility maximization (RUM) based measure of accessibility to transit: Accurate capturing of the first-mile issue in urban transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 313-320.
    10. Helmers, Christian & Krishnan, Pramila & Patnam, Manasa, 2019. "Attention and saliency on the internet: Evidence from an online recommendation system," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 216-242.
    11. Duncan, Michael & Christensen, Robert K., 2013. "An analysis of park-and-ride provision at light rail stations across the US," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 148-157.
    12. Cho, Woohyun & Windle, Robert J. & Dresner, Martin E., 2015. "The impact of low-cost carriers on airport choice in the US: A case study of the Washington–Baltimore region," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 141-157.
    13. Carlos Romero & Clara Zamorano & Emilio Ortega & Belén Martín, 2021. "Access to Secondary HSR Stations in the Urban Periphery: A Generalised Cost-Based Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Kok, Nils & Jennen, Maarten, 2012. "The impact of energy labels and accessibility on office rents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 489-497.
    15. André De Palma & Fay Dunkerley & Stef Proost, 2005. "Asymmetric Duopoly in Space - what policies work?," ERSA conference papers ersa05p494, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Zhang, Yunlong & Xie, Yuanchang, 2005. "Small community airport choice behavior analysis: A case study of GTR," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 442-447.
    17. Cascetta, Ennio & Papola, Andrea, 2009. "Dominance among alternatives in random utility models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 170-179, February.
    18. Isaac Levi Henderson & Kan Wai Hong Tsui & Thanh Ngo & Andrew Gilbey & Mark Avis, 2024. "The Nature of Airport Brand Associations," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-33, July.
    19. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima & Erkut Y. Ozbay, 2012. "Revealed Attention," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2183-2205, August.
    20. Ishii, Jun & Jun, Sunyoung & Van Dender, Kurt, 2009. "Air travel choices in multi-airport markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 216-227, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:12:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1134_s2079970522020204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.