IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v11y2021i1d10.1134_s2079970522010075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Border Trade Of Russian Regions In 2013–2019

Author

Listed:
  • I. A. Shubin

    (Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography)

Abstract

— The article examines the cross-border trade of Russian regions, taking into account the indicators of its volume and commodity structure and the level of economic complexity. The paper identifies the main forms of cross-border trade interaction and types of border regions in terms of the strength and characteristics of trade relations with a neighboring country. A conclusion is made about the low intensity of cross-border trade in Russian regions. This is due to several factors: most of the border areas are located on the economic periphery, both for Russia and for neighboring countries; there are physical and geographical barriers in many areas; and the development of the border area is small. In some cases, the low economic potential of a neighboring country or existing geopolitical restrictions prevent the growth of trade volumes. Against this background, two sections of the border area stand out: the Russian–Belarusian and the Russian–Chinese. In the first case, the development of trade is facilitated by the absence of customs barriers, historical ties, and ethnocultural proximity and a high degree of infrastructure development in border areas; in the second case, by the huge scale of the economy of the neighboring country and large potential volume of trade with it. In the commodity structure of cross-border trade and its complexity, Russian border regions are usually suppliers of relatively simple goods: raw materials or products of the first processing stages, and importers of higher-complexity goods, which generally corresponds to the foreign trade specialization of Russia as a whole. In 2013–2019, the volume of cross-border trade in Russian regions significantly decreased, mainly due to a reduction in consumer and investment imports caused by a decrease in demand. The strongest decline occurred in cross-border trade with Ukraine, where the deterioration of political relations was also supplemented by the country-wide factors. The volume of cross-border trade increased during this period in the Russian–Finnish and Russian–Estonian sections of the border (due to an increase in the export volume of nickel matte and mineral fertilizers). The changes in the commodity structure of cross-border trade that took place in 2013–2019 indicate consolidation of the existing specialization of Russian border regions as suppliers of raw materials and simple products in trade with neighboring countries (except for the republics of the former USSR).

Suggested Citation

  • I. A. Shubin, 2021. "Cross-Border Trade Of Russian Regions In 2013–2019," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 55-64, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970522010075
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522010075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970522010075
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970522010075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hausmann, Ricardo & Hidalgo, Cesar A., 2010. "Country Diversification, Product Ubiquity, and Economic Divergence," Working Paper Series rwp10-045, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. V. A. Kolosov & M. V. Zotova & A. B. Sebentsov, 2016. "The barrier function of Russia’s borders," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 387-397, October.
    3. Ricardo Hausmann & Jason Hwang & Dani Rodrik, 2007. "What you export matters," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, March.
    4. N. Ryzhova., 2009. "The Influence of Border Trade on Economic Development of Russia and China," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph, Andreas & Osbat, Chiara, 2016. "How you export matters: the disassortative structure of international trade," Working Paper Series 1958, European Central Bank.
    2. Can Li & Qi He & Han Ji, 2023. "Can Global Value Chain Upgrading Promote Regional Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence and Mechanism Analysis Based on City-Level Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Felipe, Jesus & Kumar, Utsav & Abdon, Arnelyn & Bacate, Marife, 2012. "Product complexity and economic development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 36-68.
    4. Daniel Nepelski & Giuditta De Prato, 2020. "Technological complexity and economic development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 448-470, May.
    5. İzak Atiyas & Ozan Bakis, 2015. "Structural Change and Industrial Policy in Turkey," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 1209-1229, November.
    6. Yuanhong Hu & Min Jiang & Sheng Sun & Yixin Dai, 2022. "Does Trade Facilitation Promote Export Technological Sophistication? Evidence From the European Transition Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    7. Guohao Song & Chunlin Ding, 2024. "How Do Local Environmental Regulations Affect the Export Technological Complexity of Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Clovis Freire, 2011. "Productive Capacities in Asia and the Pacific," MPDD Working Paper Series WP/11/17, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    9. Christian Henn & Chris Papageorgiou & Jose Manuel Romero & Nikola Spatafora, 2020. "Export Quality in Advanced and Developing Economies: Evidence from a New Data Set," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 68(2), pages 421-451, June.
    10. Hu, Yuanhong, 2020. "Trade Facilitation, R&D Innovation, and Export Sophistication of Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Russia and Central-Eastern European Countries," EconStor Preprints 222927, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Eum, Wonsub & Lee, Jeong-Dong, 2019. "Role of production in fostering innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 84, pages 1-10.
    12. Kindberg-Hanlon,Gene & Okou,Cedric Iltis Finafa, 2020. "Productivity Convergence : Is Anyone Catching Up?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9378, The World Bank.
    13. Verspagen, Bart & Kaltenberg, Mary, 2015. "Catching-up in a globalised context: Technological change as a driver of growth," MERIT Working Papers 2015-049, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    14. Xiaoping Li & Shuzhou Peng & Wei‐Chiao Huang & Qian Zhou, 2022. "What Drives Chinese Firms' Export Sophistication? A Perspective from the Rise of Minimum Wages," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(2), pages 28-59, March.
    15. Myriam Ben Saâd & Giscard Assoumou Ella, 2019. "Economic Complexity and Gender Inequality in Education: An Empirical Study," Post-Print hal-03426719, HAL.
    16. Felipe Orsolin Teixeira & Fabricio Jose Missio & Ricardo Dathein, 2022. "Economic complexity, structural transformation and economic growth in a regional context: Evidence for Brazil," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(300), pages 63-79.
    17. Olimpia Neagu & Mircea Constantin Teodoru, 2019. "The Relationship between Economic Complexity, Energy Consumption Structure and Greenhouse Gas Emission: Heterogeneous Panel Evidence from the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Zheng, Hong-Hao & Wang, Zheng-Xin, 2019. "Measurement and comparison of export sophistication of the new energy industry in 30 countries during 2000–2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 140-158.
    19. Eduardo Borensztein & Eduardo Cavallo & Patricio Valenzuela, 2009. "Debt Sustainability Under Catastrophic Risk: The Case for Government Budget Insurance," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 12(2), pages 273-294, September.
    20. Yue Teng & Dic Lo, 2019. "Determinants of Developing Countries' Export Upgrading: The Role of China and Productive Investment," Working Papers 227, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970522010075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.