IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v101y2022i3d10.1007_s11134-021-09722-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation of a single-server queue with customers who dynamically choose their service durations

Author

Listed:
  • Royi Jacobovic

    (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

Abstract

In recent years, there is a growing attention towards queueing models with customers who choose their service durations. The model assumptions in the existing literature imply that every customer knows his service demand when he enters into the service position. Clearly, this property is not consistent with some real-life situations. Motivated by this issue, the current work includes a single-server queueing model with customers who dynamically choose their service durations. In this setup, the main result is existence of a quadratic price function which (1) implies an optimal resource allocation from a social point of view and (2) internalizes the externalities in the system. In addition, it is explained how to compute its parameters efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Royi Jacobovic, 2022. "Regulation of a single-server queue with customers who dynamically choose their service durations," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 245-290, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:101:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-021-09722-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-021-09722-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-021-09722-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-021-09722-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wayne A. Leeman, 1964. "Letter to the Editor—The Reduction of Queues Through the Use of Price," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 783-785, October.
    2. Ariel Rubinstein, 2012. "Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory: The Economic Agent Second Edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 9742.
    3. John D. Hey, 2018. "Experimental investigations of errors in decision making under risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 17, pages 381-388, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Edelson, Noel M & Hildebrand, David K, 1975. "Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(1), pages 81-92, January.
    5. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    6. Moshe Haviv & Ya'acov Ritov, 1998. "Externalities, Tangible Externalities, and Queue Disciplines," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 850-858, June.
    7. Marina Agranov & Pietro Ortoleva, 2017. "Stochastic Choice and Preferences for Randomization," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 125(1), pages 40-68.
    8. L. Alili & A. E. Kyprianou, 2005. "Some remarks on first passage of Levy processes, the American put and pasting principles," Papers math/0508487, arXiv.org.
    9. Ballinger, T Parker & Wilcox, Nathaniel T, 1997. "Decisions, Error and Heterogeneity," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(443), pages 1090-1105, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Royi Jacobovic & Nikki Levering & Onno Boxma, 2023. "Externalities in the M/G/1 queue: LCFS-PR versus FCFS," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 239-267, August.
    2. Royi Jacobovic, 2022. "Internalization of externalities in queues with discretionary services," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 453-455, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moshe Haviv & Binyamin Oz, 2018. "Self-Regulation of an Unobservable Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2380-2389, May.
    2. Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Blavatskyy, Pavlo, 2018. "Fechner’s strong utility model for choice among n>2 alternatives: Risky lotteries, Savage acts, and intertemporal payoffs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 75-82.
    4. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Refael Hassin, 2022. "Profit maximization and cost balancing in queueing systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 429-431, April.
    6. Tesnim Naceur & Yezekael Hayel, 2020. "Deterministic state-based information disclosure policies and social welfare maximization in strategic queueing systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 303-328, December.
    7. Jalili Marand, Ata & Tang, Ou & Li, Hongyan, 2019. "Quandary of service logistics: Fast or reliable?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 983-996.
    8. Dimitrakopoulos, Y. & Burnetas, A.N., 2016. "Customer equilibrium and optimal strategies in an M/M/1 queue with dynamic service control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 477-486.
    9. John D. Hey, 2018. "Why We Should Not Be Silent About Noise," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 13, pages 309-329, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Andersen, Steffen & Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten Igel & Rutström, Elisabet E., 2010. "Behavioral econometrics for psychologists," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 553-576, August.
    11. Antonis Economou & Spyridoula Kanta, 2011. "Equilibrium customer strategies and social–profit maximization in the single‐server constant retrial queue," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 107-122, March.
    12. Liu Shi & Jianying Qiu & Jiangyan Li & Frank Bohn, 2024. "Consciously stochastic in preference reversals," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 255-297, June.
    13. Moshe Haviv & Binyamin Oz, 2014. "Self-regulation of a queue via random priorities," Discussion Paper Series dp674, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    14. Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2013. "Equilibrium balking strategies for a clearing queueing system in alternating environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 489-514, September.
    15. Henry Stott, 2006. "Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 101-130, March.
    16. Jay Pil Choi & Byung‐Cheol Kim, 2010. "Net neutrality and investment incentives," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(3), pages 446-471, September.
    17. Wang, Jinting & Zhang, Feng, 2013. "Strategic joining in M/M/1 retrial queues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 76-87.
    18. Olga Bountali & Antonis Economou, 2019. "Equilibrium threshold joining strategies in partially observable batch service queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 231-253, June.
    19. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    20. Anna Conte & John D. Hey & Peter G. Moffatt, 2018. "Mixture models of choice under risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 1, pages 3-12, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:101:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-021-09722-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.