IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v57y2023i2d10.1007_s11135-022-01407-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sources of uncertainty in functional measurement methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Cesare Masin

    (University of Padova)

  • Michele Vicovaro

    (University of Padova)

Abstract

Functional measurement methodology is applied in many psychological fields to investigate cognitive operations of information integration that people use in judgment and decision making. It is in principle an effective methodology. However, it relies on multi-subject designs and includes the methods of rating, factorial design, and analysis of variance that may cause difficulties in interpreting findings. This paper examines these difficulties and suggests future research that may overcome them.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Cesare Masin & Michele Vicovaro, 2023. "Sources of uncertainty in functional measurement methodology," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1185-1205, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01407-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01407-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-022-01407-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-022-01407-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teisseyre, Nathalie & Mullet, Etienne & Sorum, Paul Clay, 2005. "Under what conditions is euthanasia acceptable to lay people and health professionals?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 357-368, January.
    2. van Herk, H. & Poortinga, Y.H. & Verhallen, T.M.M., 2004. "Response styles in rating scales : Evidence of method bias in data from 6 EU countries," Other publications TiSEM c8befc7a-f2f4-44cf-b2fc-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Joeri Hofmans & Peter Theuns, 2010. "Testing the impact of predefined and self-defined end anchors on the linearity of the category rating scale," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 397-408, April.
    4. Joeri Hofmans & Etienne Mullet, 2013. "Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: a clustering-based approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 455-464, January.
    5. Celia E. Wills & Colleen F. Moore, 1994. "Judgment Processes for Medication Acceptance," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 14(2), pages 137-145, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Heimann & Étienne Mullet & Jean-François Bonnefon, 2015. "Peoples’ Views About the Acceptability of Executive Bonuses and Compensation Policies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 661-671, March.
    2. Wilson López López & Claudia Pineda Marín & Paul Sorum & Etienne Mullet, 2016. "Prohibition, Regulation or Free Market: A Mapping of Colombian People’s Perspectives Regarding National Drug Policies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 689-710, March.
    3. Parpa, Efi & Mystakidou, Kyriaki & Tsilika, Eleni & Sakkas, Pavlos & Patiraki, Elisabeth & Pistevou-Gombaki, Kyriaki & Govina, Ourania & Panagiotou, Irene & Galanos, Antonis & Gouliamos, Athanasios, 2010. "Attitudes of health care professionals, relatives of advanced cancer patients and public towards euthanasia and physician assisted suicide," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 160-165, October.
    4. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2016. "Response Styles in Rating Scales," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(3), pages 239-268, June.
    5. Erwin Stolz & Nathalie Burkert & Franziska Großschädl & Éva Rásky & Willibald J Stronegger & Wolfgang Freidl, 2015. "Determinants of Public Attitudes towards Euthanasia in Adults and Physician-Assisted Death in Neonates in Austria: A National Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Joeri Hofmans & Etienne Mullet, 2013. "Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: a clustering-based approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 455-464, January.
    7. Etienne Mullet & Gérard Chasseigne, 2018. "Assessing information integration processes: a comparison of findings obtained with between-subjects designs versus within-subjects designs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1977-1988, July.
    8. Jerzy Wierzbinski & Anna O. Kuzminska & Grzegorz Krol, 2014. "Konsekwencje wyboru typu skali odpowiedzi w badaniach ankietowych (Consequences of using different types of rating scales)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 12(45), pages 113-136.
    9. Andre A. Pekerti & Denni Arli, 2017. "Do Cultural and Generational Cohorts Matter to Ideologies and Consumer Ethics? A Comparative Study of Australians, Indonesians, and Indonesian Migrants in Australia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 387-404, June.
    10. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    11. Joshua B. Gilbert & Zachary Himmelsbach & James Soland & Mridul Joshi & Benjamin W. Domingue, 2024. "Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Item-Level Outcome Data: Insights from Item Response Theory," Papers 2405.00161, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    12. Alain Beuckelaer & Machiel Zeeman & Hans Trijp, 2015. "Assessment of the cross-national validity of an End-anchored 9-point hedonic product liking scale," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1267-1286, May.
    13. Aurélie Bertrand & Christian Hafner, 2014. "On heterogeneous latent class models with applications to the analysis of rating scores," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 307-330, February.
    14. Joana Margarida Sequeira Neto & Etienne Mullet, 2018. "Perceived Acceptability of Organizational Layoffs and Job Alliances During a Recession: A Mapping of Portuguese People’s Views," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1149-1157, November.
    15. Piotr Białowolski, 2016. "The influence of negative response style on survey-based household inflation expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 509-528, March.
    16. Tellis, Gerard J. & Chandrasekaran, Deepa, 2010. "Extent and impact of response biases in cross-national survey research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 329-341.
    17. Wilson López López & María Alejandra Roa Bocarejo & Diana Roa Peralta & Claudia Pineda Marín & Etienne Mullet, 2017. "Mapping Colombian Citizens’ Views Regarding Ordinary Corruption: Threat, Bribery, and the Illicit Sharing of Confidential Information," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 259-273, August.
    18. Leonard J. Paas & Meike Morren, 2018. "PLease do not answer if you are reading this: respondent attention in online panels," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 13-21, March.
    19. Joana Margarida Sequeira Neto & Etienne Mullet, 2016. "Perceived Legitimacy of Executives Bonuses in Time of Global Crisis: A Mapping of Portuguese People’s Views," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 421-429, February.
    20. Mary Margaret Rogers & Robert A. Peterson & Gerald Albaum, 2013. "Measuring Business Related Ethicality Globally: Cultural Emic Or Etic?," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01407-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.