IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0124320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Public Attitudes towards Euthanasia in Adults and Physician-Assisted Death in Neonates in Austria: A National Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Erwin Stolz
  • Nathalie Burkert
  • Franziska Großschädl
  • Éva Rásky
  • Willibald J Stronegger
  • Wolfgang Freidl

Abstract

Background: Euthanasia remains a controversial topic in both public discourses and legislation. Although some determinants of acceptance of euthanasia and physician-assisted death have been identified in previous studies, there is still a shortage of information whether different forms of euthanasia are supported by the same or different sub-populations and whether authoritarian personality dispositions are linked to attitudes towards euthanasia. Methods: A large, representative face-to-face survey was conducted in Austria in 2014 (n = 1,971). Respondents faced three scenarios of euthanasia and one of physician assisted death differing regarding the level of specificity, voluntariness and subject, requiring either approval or rejection: (1) abstract description of euthanasia, (2) abstract description of physician-assisted suicide, (3) the case of euthanasia of a terminally-ill 79-year old cancer patient, and (4) the case of non-voluntary, physician assisted death of a severely disabled or ill neonate. A number of potential determinants for rejection ordered in three categories (socio-demographic, personal experience, orientations) including authoritarianism were tested via multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: Rejection was highest in the case of the neonate (69%) and lowest for the case of the older cancer patient (35%). A consistent negative impact of religiosity on the acceptance across all scenarios and differential effects for socio-economic status, area of residence, religious confession, liberalism, and authoritarianism were found. Individuals with a stronger authoritarian personality disposition were more likely to reject physician-assisted suicide for adults but at the same time also more likely to approve of physician-assisted death of a disabled neonate. Conclusion: Euthanasia in adults was supported by a partially different sub-population than assisted death of disabled neonates.

Suggested Citation

  • Erwin Stolz & Nathalie Burkert & Franziska Großschädl & Éva Rásky & Willibald J Stronegger & Wolfgang Freidl, 2015. "Determinants of Public Attitudes towards Euthanasia in Adults and Physician-Assisted Death in Neonates in Austria: A National Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0124320
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124320
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124320&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0124320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macdonald, William L., 1998. "Situational factors and attitudes toward voluntary euthanasia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 73-81, January.
    2. Teisseyre, Nathalie & Mullet, Etienne & Sorum, Paul Clay, 2005. "Under what conditions is euthanasia acceptable to lay people and health professionals?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 357-368, January.
    3. Rietjens, Judith A.C. & van der Heide, Agnes & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. & van der Maas, Paul J. & van der Wal, Gerrit, 2005. "A comparison of attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: Survey among the Dutch general public and physicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1723-1732, October.
    4. Singer, Peter A. & Choudhry, Sujit & Armstrong, Jane & Meslin, Eric M. & Lowy, Frederick H., 1995. "Public opinion regarding end-of-life decisions: Influence of prognosis, practice and process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(11), pages 1517-1521, December.
    5. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    6. Lorella Lotto & Andrea Manfrinati & Davide Rigoni & Rino Rumiati & Giuseppe Sartori & Niels Birbaumer, 2012. "Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decisions and the Subjective Concepts of Consciousness: An Empirical Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-5, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damon Proulx & David A. Savage, 2020. "What Determines End-of-Life Attitudes? Revisiting the Dutch Experience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 1085-1125, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Vilpert & Carmen Borrat-Besson & Gian Domenico Borasio & Jürgen Maurer, 2020. "Associations of end-of-life preferences and trust in institutions with public support for assisted suicide evidence from nationally representative survey data of older adults in Switzerland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Sergio Cesare Masin & Michele Vicovaro, 2023. "Sources of uncertainty in functional measurement methodology," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1185-1205, April.
    3. Parpa, Efi & Mystakidou, Kyriaki & Tsilika, Eleni & Sakkas, Pavlos & Patiraki, Elisabeth & Pistevou-Gombaki, Kyriaki & Govina, Ourania & Panagiotou, Irene & Galanos, Antonis & Gouliamos, Athanasios, 2010. "Attitudes of health care professionals, relatives of advanced cancer patients and public towards euthanasia and physician assisted suicide," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 160-165, October.
    4. Davidson, Laura A. & Pettis, Clare T. & Joiner, Amber J. & Cook, Daniel M. & Klugman, Craig M., 2010. "Religion and conscientious objection: A survey of pharmacists' willingness to dispense medications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 161-165, July.
    5. Sinclair, Craig & Smith, Jessica & Toussaint, Yann & Auret, Kirsten, 2014. "Discussing dying in the diaspora: Attitudes towards advance care planning among first generation Dutch and Italian migrants in rural Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 86-93.
    6. Lemiengre, Joke & Dierckx de Casterlé, Bernadette & Verbeke, Geert & Van Craen, Katleen & Schotsmans, Paul & Gastmans, Chris, 2008. "Ethics policies on euthanasia in nursing homes: A survey in Flanders, Belgium," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 376-386, January.
    7. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    8. Elia Fernández-Martínez & Juan José Fernández-Muñoz & Cristina Romero-Blanco & María Laura Parra-Fernández & María Dolores Onieva-Zafra, 2020. "Spanish Version of the Attitude Towards Euthanasia Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-8, May.
    9. Joachim Cohen & Paul Landeghem & Nico Carpentier & Luc Deliens, 2014. "Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: a survey study in 47 countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 143-156, February.
    10. Cohen, Joachim & Van Wesemael, Yanna & Smets, Tinne & Bilsen, Johan & Deliens, Luc, 2012. "Cultural differences affecting euthanasia practice in Belgium: One law but different attitudes and practices in Flanders and Wallonia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 845-853.
    11. Rietjens, Judith A.C. & van der Heide, Agnes & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. & van der Maas, Paul J. & van der Wal, Gerrit, 2005. "A comparison of attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: Survey among the Dutch general public and physicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1723-1732, October.
    12. Young Ho Yun & Jin-Ah Sim & Yeani Choi & Hyejeong Yoon, 2022. "Attitudes toward the Legalization of Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    13. Eliott, Jaklin A. & Olver, Ian N., 2008. "Dying cancer patients talk about euthanasia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 647-656, August.
    14. Damon Proulx & David A. Savage, 2020. "What Determines End-of-Life Attitudes? Revisiting the Dutch Experience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 1085-1125, December.
    15. Marco Heimann & Étienne Mullet & Jean-François Bonnefon, 2015. "Peoples’ Views About the Acceptability of Executive Bonuses and Compensation Policies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 661-671, March.
    16. Lemiengre, Joke & de Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx & Van Craen, Katleen & Schotsmans, Paul & Gastmans, Chris, 2007. "Institutional ethics policies on medical end-of-life decisions: A literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 131-143, October.
    17. Lemiengre, Joke & Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx de & Verbeke, Geert & Guisson, Catherine & Schotsmans, Paul & Gastmans, Chris, 2007. "Ethics policies on euthanasia in hospitals--A survey in Flanders (Belgium)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(2-3), pages 170-180, December.
    18. Maksim Rudnev & Aleksandra Savelkaeva, 2016. "Public Support for the Right to Euthanasia: The Competing Roles of Values and Religiosity Across 35 Nations," HSE Working papers WP BRP 59/PSY/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0124320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.