IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i1p93-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical investigation of mobbing, stress and employees’ behavior at work place: quantitatively refining a qualitative model

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Qureshi
  • Mehwish Iftikhar
  • Saquib Janjua
  • Khalid Zaman
  • Uzma Raja
  • Yasir Javed

Abstract

Organizations are consistently looking ways to reduce occupational stress to improve the productivity of their employees. It is matter of great interest for them to find out potential causes of occupational stress. Mobbing is relatively new concept for behavioral scientists, which illustrates in the form of unfriendly behavior of employee at workplace. The current study finds out different causes of Mobbing and their relationship with mobbing behavior, stress and employee behavior at workplace. The study uses exploratory factor analysis to identify causes of the mobbing and structural equation modeling to test relationship between constructs. A convenient sample of 450 employees from Higher Education Institutions of Pakistan (Sindh, Punjab, Baluchistan and Khyber Pakhtoonkhawa province) was taken for empirical investigation. The empirical findings reveal that mobbing has a positive relationship with stress and leads to negative employee behavior at workplace. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Qureshi & Mehwish Iftikhar & Saquib Janjua & Khalid Zaman & Uzma Raja & Yasir Javed, 2015. "Empirical investigation of mobbing, stress and employees’ behavior at work place: quantitatively refining a qualitative model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 93-113, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:1:p:93-113
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9976-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9976-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-013-9976-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hung-Wen Lee & Kuo-Wei Yen, 2013. "A study of the relationship between work values and career orientation of employed in the high technology industry," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 803-810, February.
    2. Azzem Ozkan & Mahmut Ozdevecioğlu, 2013. "The effects of occupational stress on burnout and life satisfaction: a study in accountants," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2785-2798, August.
    3. M. Angeles Carnero & Blanca Martínez & Rocı´o Sa´nchez‐Mangas, 2012. "Mobbing and workers’ health: empirical analysis for Spain," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 322-339, June.
    4. Jan W. Rivkin, 2001. "Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 274-293, June.
    5. Sedat Göçen & Şevket Yirik & Yusuf Yılmaz & Volkan Altıntaş, 2013. "Intercompany mobbing: the effects of company growth," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1275-1285, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehwish Iftikhar & Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Shazia Qayyum & Iram Fatima & Sriyanto Sriyanto & Yasinta Indrianti & Aqeel Khan & Leo-Paul Dana, 2021. "Impact of Multifaceted Workplace Bullying on the Relationships between Technology Usage, Organisational Climate and Employee Physical and Emotional Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Rajah A/l Rasiah & Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & Maqsood Haider & Hanifah Jambari & Iswan & Sasmoko, 2019. "Modeling Work Practices under Socio-Technical Systems for Sustainable Manufacturing Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    2. Richard J. Arend & Moren Lévesque, 2010. "Is the Resource-Based View a Practical Organizational Theory?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 913-930, August.
    3. Frenken, Koen, 2006. "A fitness landscape approach to technological complexity, modularity, and vertical disintegration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 288-305, September.
    4. Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 576-589.
    5. Hart E. Posen & Dirk Martignoni & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2013. "E Pluribus Unum: Organizational Size and the Efficacy of Learning," DRUID Working Papers 13-09, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    6. Ioannides, Yannis M., 2012. "Complexity and organizational architecture," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 193-202.
    7. Sidney G. Winter & Gino Cattani & Alex Dorsch, 2007. "The Value of Moderate Obsession: Insights from a New Model of Organizational Search," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 403-419, June.
    8. Christina Fang & Jeho Lee & Melissa A. Schilling, 2010. "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 625-642, June.
    9. Perez-Mujica, Luisa & Duncan, Roderick & Bossomaier, Terry, 2014. "Using agent-based models to design social marketing campaign," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 36-44.
    10. Alex Coad, 2007. "Firm Growth: a Survey," Post-Print halshs-00155762, HAL.
    11. Gatti, Corrado & Volpe, Loredana & Vagnani, Gianluca, 2015. "Interdependence among productive activities: Implications for exploration and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 711-722.
    12. Erik Brynjolfsson & Andrew McAfee & Michael Sorell & Feng Zhu, 2007. "Scale without mass: business process replication and industry dynamics," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    13. Bill McKelvey & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein & Pierpaolo Andriani, 2012. "When organisations and ecosystems interact: toward a law of requisite fractality in firms," International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 104-136.
    14. Jerzy Kazmierczyk & Daria Figas & Maria Akulich & Ireneusz Jazwinski, 2021. "Mobbing in Banks: The Role of Gender and Position on the Process of Mobbing in Banks in Poland and Russia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 697-714.
    15. Friederike Wall, 2015. "Beneficial Effects Of Randomized Organizational Change On Performance," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05n06), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Nachiket Bhawe & Shaker A. Zahra & Chen Chao & Garry D. Bruton, 2021. "Protectionist policies and diversity of entrepreneurial types," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 789-807, February.
    18. Sergey Anokhin & Joakim Wincent & Erkko Autio, 2011. "Operationalizing opportunities in entrepreneurship research: use of data envelopment analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 39-57, July.
    19. Barros, Henrique M., 2021. "Neither at the cutting edge nor in a patent-friendly environment: Appropriating the returns from innovation in a less developed economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    20. Arie Y. Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2011. "Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 81-98, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:1:p:93-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.