IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v48y2014i4p2277-2294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending monitoring methods to textual data: a research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Triss Ashton
  • Nicholas Evangelopoulos
  • Victor Prybutok

Abstract

Textual data has become increasingly common in business analytic data sets. While concept-based text mining offers a method of extracting meaningful information from text data, methods for monitoring of customer perceptions of business processes and products that are discussed in customer-generated documents are not immediately available. We explore the results of two text-mining algorithms and review issues observed in the data that affect uploading the results onto a newly proposed methodological monitoring platform analogous to statistical process control charts. Finally, we discuss several topics for future research in text mining. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Triss Ashton & Nicholas Evangelopoulos & Victor Prybutok, 2014. "Extending monitoring methods to textual data: a research agenda," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2277-2294, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:4:p:2277-2294
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9891-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9891-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-013-9891-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel D. Lee & H. Sebastian Seung, 1999. "Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6755), pages 788-791, October.
    2. Grün, Bettina & Hornik, Kurt, 2011. "topicmodels: An R Package for Fitting Topic Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i13).
    3. Scott Deerwester & Susan T. Dumais & George W. Furnas & Thomas K. Landauer & Richard Harshman, 1990. "Indexing by latent semantic analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 41(6), pages 391-407, September.
    4. Peter Swanborn, 1996. "A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 19-35, February.
    5. Ding, Chris & Li, Tao & Peng, Wei, 2008. "On the equivalence between Non-negative Matrix Factorization and Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(8), pages 3913-3927, April.
    6. C. Poortman & K. Schildkamp, 2012. "Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1727-1751, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaroslav Ráček & Jan Ministr, 2014. "Tools for Automatic Recognition of Persons and their Relationships in Unstructured Data [Nástroje pro automatické rozpoznávání entit a jejich vztahů v nestrukturovaných textech]," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 280-287.
    2. Zavala, Araceli & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2019. "Visual analytics for identifying product disruptions and effects via social media," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 544-559.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md Nazrul Islam & Md Mofazzal Hossain & Md Shafayet Shahed Ornob, 2024. "Business research on Industry 4.0: a systematic review using topic modelling approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Nicolas Jouvin & Pierre Latouche & Charles Bouveyron & Guillaume Bataillon & Alain Livartowski, 2021. "Greedy clustering of count data through a mixture of multinomial PCA," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Bastian Schaefermeier & Gerd Stumme & Tom Hanika, 2021. "Topic space trajectories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5759-5795, July.
    4. Imran Ali & Devika Kannan, 2022. "Mapping research on healthcare operations and supply chain management: a topic modelling-based literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 29-55, August.
    5. Maksym Polyakov & Morteza Chalak & Md. Sayed Iftekhar & Ram Pandit & Sorada Tapsuwan & Fan Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2018. "Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 217-239, September.
    6. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Lüdering Jochen & Winker Peter, 2016. "Forward or Backward Looking? The Economic Discourse and the Observed Reality," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 236(4), pages 483-515, August.
    8. Cho, Yung-Jan & Fu, Pei-Wen & Wu, Chi-Cheng, 2017. "Popular Research Topics in Marketing Journals, 1995–2014," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 52-72.
    9. Enna Hirata & Daisuke Watanabe & Athanasios Chalmoukis & Maria Lambrou, 2024. "A Topic Modeling Approach to Determine Supply Chain Management Priorities Enabled by Digital Twin Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Tobias Koopmann & Maximilian Stubbemann & Matthias Kapa & Michael Paris & Guido Buenstorf & Tom Hanika & Andreas Hotho & Robert Jäschke & Gerd Stumme, 2021. "Proximity dimensions and the emergence of collaboration: a HypTrails study on German AI research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9847-9868, December.
    11. Yoshi Fujiwara & Rubaiyat Islam, 2021. "Bitcoin's Crypto Flow Network," Papers 2106.11446, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    12. D. Thorleuchter & D. Van Den Poel, 2013. "Weak Signal Identification with Semantic Web Mining," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/860, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    13. van Loon, Austin, 2022. "Three Families of Automated Text Analysis," SocArXiv htnej, Center for Open Science.
    14. Liang Guo & Shikun Li & Ruodan Lu & Lei Yin & Ariane Gorson-Deruel & Lawrence King, 2018. "The research topic landscape in the literature of social class and inequality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Travis R Meyer & Daniel Balagué & Miguel Camacho-Collados & Hao Li & Katie Khuu & P Jeffrey Brantingham & Andrea L Bertozzi, 2019. "A year in Madrid as described through the analysis of geotagged Twitter data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(9), pages 1724-1740, November.
    16. Andreas Falke & Harald Hruschka, 2022. "Analyzing browsing across websites by machine learning methods," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(5), pages 829-852, July.
    17. Zhang, Zhong-Yuan & Gai, Yujie & Wang, Yu-Fei & Cheng, Hui-Min & Liu, Xin, 2018. "On equivalence of likelihood maximization of stochastic block model and constrained nonnegative matrix factorization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 687-697.
    18. Romain Gauchon & Stéphane Loisel & Jean-Louis Rullière, 2020. "Health-policyholder clustering using health consumption," Post-Print hal-02156058, HAL.
    19. Lüdering, Jochen & Tillmann, Peter, 2020. "Monetary policy on twitter and asset prices: Evidence from computational text analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    20. Javier De la Hoz-M & Mª José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes, 2021. "LDAShiny: An R Package for Exploratory Review of Scientific Literature Based on a Bayesian Probabilistic Model and Machine Learning Tools," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:4:p:2277-2294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.