IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v80y2015i3p608-610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Comments on Wu and Browne

Author

Listed:
  • Rolf Steyer
  • Erik Sengewald
  • Sonja Hahn

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rolf Steyer & Erik Sengewald & Sonja Hahn, 2015. "Some Comments on Wu and Browne," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 608-610, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:80:y:2015:i:3:p:608-610
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9453-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-015-9453-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-015-9453-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffi Pohl & Rolf Steyer & Katrin Kraus, 2008. "Modelling method effects as individual causal effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(1), pages 41-63, January.
    2. Michael Eid, 2000. "A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 241-261, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Robitzsch, 2023. "Modeling Model Misspecification in Structural Equation Models," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Hao Wu & Michael Browne, 2015. "Random Model Discrepancy: Interpretations and Technicalities (A Rejoinder)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 619-624, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chester Chun Seng Kam, 2018. "Why Do We Still Have an Impoverished Understanding of the Item Wording Effect? An Empirical Examination," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(3), pages 574-597, August.
    2. Christian Geiser & Michael Eid & Fridtjof Nussbeck & Delphine Courvoisier & David Cole, 2010. "Multitrait-multimethod change modelling," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 94(2), pages 185-201, June.
    3. Tobias Koch & Martin Schultze & Jana Holtmann & Christian Geiser & Michael Eid, 2017. "A Multimethod Latent State-Trait Model for Structurally Different And Interchangeable Methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 17-47, March.
    4. Tobias Koch & Martin Schultze & Jeremy Burrus & Richard D. Roberts & Michael Eid, 2015. "A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(5), pages 477-510, October.
    5. Minjeong Jeon & Frank Rijmen & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2018. "CFA Models with a General Factor and Multiple Sets of Secondary Factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 785-808, December.
    6. Boakye, Kwabena G. & Natesan, Prathiba & Prybutok, Victor R., 2020. "A correlated uniqueness model of service quality measurement among users of cloud-based service platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Robert Neumann & Peter Graeff, 2010. "A Multitrait-Multimethod approach to pinpoint the validity of aggregated governance indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 849-864, August.
    8. Steffi Pohl & Rolf Steyer & Katrin Kraus, 2008. "Modelling method effects as individual causal effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(1), pages 41-63, January.
    9. Dhekra Ben Amara & Hong Chen, 2021. "Evidence for the Mediating Effects of Eco-Innovation and the Impact of Driving Factors on Sustainable Business Growth of Agribusiness," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(3), pages 251-266, September.
    10. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    11. Guido Alessandri & Michele Vecchione & Brent Donnellan & John Tisak, 2013. "An Application of the LC-LSTM Framework to the Self-esteem Instability Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 769-792, October.
    12. Johannes Bohn & Jana Holtmann & Maike Luhmann & Tobias Koch & Michael Eid, 2020. "Attachment to Parents and Well-Being After High School Graduation: A Study Using Self- and Parent Ratings," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(7), pages 2493-2525, October.
    13. Xijuan Zhang & Ramsha Noor & Victoria Savalei, 2016. "Examining the Effect of Reverse Worded Items on the Factor Structure of the Need for Cognition Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Del Bono, Emilia & Kinsler, Josh & Pavan, Ronni, 2020. "Skill Formation and the Trouble with Child Non-Cognitive Skill Measures," IZA Discussion Papers 13713, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. René Algesheimer & Richard P. Bagozzi & Utpal M. Dholakia, 2018. "Key Informant Models for Measuring Group-level Variables in Small Groups," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(2), pages 277-313, March.
    16. Jens Jirschitzka & Aileen Oeberst & Richard Göllner & Ulrike Cress, 2017. "Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1059-1092, November.
    17. Alexandru Cernat & Daniel L. Oberski, 2022. "Estimating stochastic survey response errors using the multitrait‐multierror model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 134-155, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:80:y:2015:i:3:p:608-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.