IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v62y1997i3p411-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling within-subject dependencies in ordinal paired comparison data

Author

Listed:
  • Ulf Böckenholt
  • William Dillon

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulf Böckenholt & William Dillon, 1997. "Modeling within-subject dependencies in ordinal paired comparison data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 411-434, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:62:y:1997:i:3:p:411-434
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02294559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02294559
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02294559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. H. Beckhart & Carl F. Behrens & George N. Emory & James J. O'leary & A. M. Weimer, 1950. "Discussion," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 5(4), pages 324-336, December.
    2. Yoshio Takane & Jan Leeuw, 1987. "On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 393-408, September.
    3. Alan Agresti, 1992. "Analysis of Ordinal Paired Comparison Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 41(2), pages 287-297, June.
    4. Vermunt, J.K., 1993. "lEM : Log-linear and event history analysis with missing data using the EM algorithm," WORC Paper 93.09.015/7, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    5. H. Morrison, 1963. "Testable conditions for triads of paired comparison choices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 28(4), pages 369-390, December.
    6. Geert Soete & Suzanne Winsberg, 1993. "A thurstonian pairwise choice model with univariate and multivariate spline transformations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 233-256, June.
    7. I. Böckenholt & W. Gaul, 1986. "Analysis of choice behaviour via probabilistic ideal point and vector models," Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 209-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jay Verkuilen, 2006. "Data analysis of asymmetric structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 781-783, December.
    2. Tsai, Rung-Ching & Bockenholt, Ulf, 2002. "Two-level linear paired comparison models: estimation and identifiability issues," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 429-449, July.
    3. Dittrich, R. & Hatzinger, R. & Katzenbeisser, W., 2002. "Modelling dependencies in paired comparison data: A log-linear approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 39-57, July.
    4. Ulf Böckenholt, 2006. "Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 615-629, December.
    5. Jean-Paul Doignon & Aleksandar Pekeč & Michel Regenwetter, 2004. "The repeated insertion model for rankings: Missing link between two subset choice models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 33-54, March.
    6. Maydeu-Olivares, Albert, 2002. "Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for preference data," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 467-483, July.
    7. Dittrich, Regina & Francis, Brian & Hatzinger, Reinhold & Katzenbeisser, Walter, 2006. "Modelling dependency in multivariate paired comparisons: A log-linear approach," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 197-209, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Leeuw, Jan, 2006. "Principal component analysis of binary data by iterated singular value decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 21-39, January.
    2. Ulf Böckenholt, 1990. "Multivariate thurstonian models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 391-403, June.
    3. Maydeu-Olivares, Albert, 2002. "Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for preference data," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 467-483, July.
    4. Mark Reiser & Karl F. Schuessler, 1991. "A Hierarchy for Some Latent Structure Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 19(4), pages 419-465, May.
    5. Christoph T. Weiss, 2012. "Persistent Attitudes and Behaviors," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0143, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    6. Martin Junge & Rainer Reisenzein, 2015. "Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling versus Ordinal Difference Scaling of emotion intensity: a comparison," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2169-2185, September.
    7. Termini, Valeria A., 1981. "Logical, mechanical and historical time in economics," MPRA Paper 24491, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Francesco Bartolucci & Ivonne Solis-Trapala, 2010. "Multidimensional Latent Markov Models in a Developmental Study of Inhibitory Control and Attentional Flexibility in Early Childhood," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 725-743, December.
    9. Molenaar, Dylan & Kő, Natasa & Rózsa, Sandor & Mészáros, Andrea, 2017. "Differentiation of cognitive abilities in the WAIS-IV at the item level," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 48-59.
    10. Yang Yixin & Lü Xin & Ma Jian & Qiao Han, 2014. "A Robust Factor Analysis Model for Dichotomous Data," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(5), pages 437-450, October.
    11. Michael H. Birnbaum & Jeffrey P. Bahra, 2012. "Separating response variability from structural inconsistency to test models of risky decision making," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(4), pages 402-426, July.
    12. Lijuan Wang, 2010. "IRT–ZIP Modeling for Multivariate Zero-Inflated Count Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 671-692, December.
    13. Chun Wang & Steven W. Nydick, 2020. "On Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models: A Didactic," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(3), pages 339-368, June.
    14. Catrien C.J.H. Bijleveld & Ab Mooijaart, 2003. "Latent Markov Modelling of Recidivism Data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 57(3), pages 305-320, August.
    15. Yong Luo & Khaleel Al-Harbi, 2016. "The Utility of the Bifactor Method for Unidimensionality Assessment When Other Methods Disagree," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, October.
    16. Dirven, H.J. & Fouarge, D.J.A.G., 1996. "Income mobility and deprivation dynamics among the elderly in Belgium and the Netherlands," WORC Paper 96.05.005/2, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    17. Jonas Moss & Steffen Grønneberg, 2023. "Partial Identification of Latent Correlations with Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 241-252, March.
    18. Thum, Anna-Elisabeth, 2013. "Psychology in econometric models: conceptual and methodological foundations," MPRA Paper 52293, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Michael Edwards, 2010. "A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach to Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 474-497, September.
    20. Edward Haertel, 1990. "Continuous and discrete latent structure models for item response data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 477-494, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:62:y:1997:i:3:p:411-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.