IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v62y1997i1p119-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the set-theoretical structure of objects by additive trees

Author

Listed:
  • Math Candel

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Math Candel, 1997. "Exploring the set-theoretical structure of objects by additive trees," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 119-131, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:62:y:1997:i:1:p:119-131
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02294783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02294783
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02294783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Candel, M. J. J. M., 1992. "The Additive Random Feature model for Unfolding and the feature structure of choice objects," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 311-342, June.
    2. Sandra Pruzansky & Amos Tversky & J. Carroll, 1982. "Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 3-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swait, Joffre & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2001. "Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 141-167, November.
    2. Olivier Gascuel & Denise Levy, 1996. "A reduction algorithm for approximating a (nonmetric) dissimilarity by a tree distance," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 13(1), pages 129-155, March.
    3. Benbasat, Izak & Lim, John, 2000. "Information Technology Support For Debiasing Group Judgments: An Empirical Evaluation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 167-183, September.
    4. Lohmann, Susanne & Hopenhayn, Hugo, 1998. "Delegation and the Regulation of Risk," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 222-246, May.
    5. J. Carroll & Linda Clark & Wayne DeSarbo, 1984. "The representation of three-way proximity data by single and multiple tree structure models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 1(1), pages 25-74, December.
    6. Lipshitz, Raanan & Strauss, Orna, 1997. "Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 149-163, February.
    7. Fox, Craig R. & Levav, Jonathan, 2000. "Familiarity Bias and Belief Reversal in Relative Likelihood Judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 268-292, July.
    8. Resnik, David B., 2001. "Ethical dilemmas in communicating medical information to the public," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 129-149, February.
    9. Wang, F. Albert, 2001. "Overconfidence, Investor Sentiment, and Evolution," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 138-170, April.
    10. Wayne DeSarbo & Ajay Manrai & Raymond Burke, 1990. "A nonspatial methodology for the analysis of two-way proximity data incorporating the distance-density hypothesis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 229-253, June.
    11. Macchi, Laura, 2000. "Partitive Formulation of Information in Probabilistic Problems: Beyond Heuristics and Frequency Format Explanations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 217-236, July.
    12. Geert Soete, 1983. "A least squares algorithm for fitting additive trees to proximity data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 621-626, December.
    13. Wang, Xiao Lu & Shi, Kan & Fan, Hong Xia, 2006. "Psychological mechanisms of investors in Chinese Stock Markets," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 762-780, December.
    14. Stewart, Thomas R. & Roebber, Paul J. & Bosart, Lance F., 1997. "The Importance of the Task in Analyzing Expert Judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 205-219, March.
    15. DiFonzo, Nicholas & Bordia, Prashant, 1997. "Rumor and Prediction: Making Sense (but Losing Dollars) in the Stock Market," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 329-353, September.
    16. Coccia, Mario, 2016. "The relation between price setting in markets and asymmetries of systems of measurement of goods," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 14(PB), pages 168-178.
    17. Johnson, Johnnie E. V. & Bruce, Alistair C., 2001. "Calibration of Subjective Probability Judgments in a Naturalistic Setting," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 265-290, July.
    18. Kleiter, Gernot D. & Krebs, Marianne & Doherty, Michael E. & Garavan, Hugh & Chadwick, Randall & Brake, Gregory, 1997. "Do Subjects Understand Base Rates?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 25-61, October.
    19. Martin Young & Wayne DeSarbo, 1995. "A parametric procedure for ultrametric tree estimation from conditional rank order proximity data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 47-75, March.
    20. George Furnas, 1989. "Metric family portraits," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 6(1), pages 7-52, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:62:y:1997:i:1:p:119-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.