IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v33y1968i2p237-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factorial rotation to simple structure and maximum similarity

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Bloxom

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Bloxom, 1968. "Factorial rotation to simple structure and maximum similarity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(2), pages 237-247, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:33:y:1968:i:2:p:237-247
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02290156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02290156
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02290156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Meredith, 1964. "Notes on factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(2), pages 177-185, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henk Kiers, 1997. "Techniques for rotating two or more loading matrices to optimal agreement and simple structure: A comparison and some technical details," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 545-568, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
    2. Richard Harshman & Margaret Lundy, 1996. "Uniqueness proof for a family of models sharing features of Tucker's three-mode factor analysis and PARAFAC/candecomp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 133-154, March.
    3. Wilson, Christopher J. & Bowden, Stephen C. & Byrne, Linda K. & Joshua, Nicole R. & Marx, Wolfgang & Weiss, Lawrence G., 2023. "The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. K. Jöreskog, 1971. "Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(4), pages 409-426, December.
    5. Michael Browne & Walter Kristof, 1969. "On the oblique rotation of a factor matrix to a specified pattern," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(2), pages 237-248, June.
    6. Bruce Bloxom, 1972. "Alternative approaches to factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 425-440, December.
    7. John McArdle, 2011. "Longitudinal dynamic analyses of cognition in the health and retirement study panel," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 453-480, December.
    8. Pitts, Steven C. & West, Stephen G. & Tein, Jenn-Yun, 1996. "Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: Examining stability and change," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 333-350, November.
    9. Bengt Muthen & Karl G. Jöreskog, 1983. "Selectivity Problems in Quasi-Experimental Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 139-174, April.
    10. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
    11. Francisco J. García Bacete & Victoria Muñoz Tinoco & Ghislaine Marande Perrin & Jesús F. Rosel Remírez, 2021. "Stability of Peer Acceptance and Rejection and Their Effect on Academic Performance in Primary Education: A Longitudinal Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Adam Carle, 2010. "Interpreting the results of studies using latent variable models to assess data quality: an empirical example using confirmatory factor analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 483-497, April.
    13. Scholderer, Joachim & Grunert, Klaus G. & Brunso, Karen, 2005. "A procedure for eliminating additive bias from cross-cultural survey data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 72-78, January.
    14. Kano, Yutaka & Takai, Keiji, 2011. "Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variate model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(9), pages 1241-1255, October.
    15. Hao Wu & Ryne Estabrook, 2016. "Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1014-1045, December.
    16. Roger Millsap, 2007. "Invariance in Measurement and Prediction Revisited," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 461-473, December.
    17. P. Bentler, 1986. "Structural modeling and psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 35-51, March.
    18. Bengt Muthén, 1989. "Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 557-585, September.
    19. William Meredith, 1993. "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 525-543, December.
    20. Jeanne A. Teresi & Chun Wang & Marjorie Kleinman & Richard N. Jones & David J. Weiss, 2021. "Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 674-711, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:33:y:1968:i:2:p:237-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.