IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v2y2018i4d10.1007_s41669-017-0063-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare Cost Development in a Type 2 Diabetes Patient Population on Glucose-Lowering Drug Treatment: A Nationwide Observational Study 2006–2014

Author

Listed:
  • David Nathanson

    (Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset)

  • Ugne Sabale

    (Astra Zeneca Nordic-Baltic)

  • Jan W. Eriksson

    (Uppsala University)

  • Thomas Nyström

    (Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset)

  • Anna Norhammar

    (Karolinska University Hospital Solna
    Capio S:t Görans Hospital)

  • Urban Olsson

    (Statisticon AB)

  • Johan Bodegård

    (AstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic)

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to describe healthcare resource use and cost development in Sweden during 2006–2014 in a type 2 diabetes (T2D) population receiving glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs). Methods In- and outpatient healthcare resource use and costs were extracted from mandatory national registries: the Cause of Death Register; the National Patient Register; and the Prescribed Drug Register. Primary care data were estimated based on an observational study including patients from 84 primary care centers in Sweden. Numbers of any cause inpatient, outpatient, and primary care contacts were extracted and direct healthcare costs were estimated. Results During 2006–2014, the number of inpatient and primary care contacts increased by approximately 70% (from 45,559 to 78,245 and from 4.9 to 8.8 million, respectively) and outpatient care contacts almost doubled (from 105,653 to 209,417). Mean annual per patient costs increased by 13%, reaching €4594. Total healthcare costs increased from €835 million to €1.684 billion. Inpatient care costs constituted 47% of total costs in 2014 (€783 million), primary care accounted for 24% (€405 million), outpatient care 18% (€303 million), non-GLD medications 6% (€109 million), and GLDs 5% (€84 million). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were the most costly disease group in inpatient care (26%), whereas managing unspecified factors influencing health and T2D-associated diseases were the most costly in outpatient care (16 and 11%, respectively). Conclusions The healthcare costs of the GLD-treated T2D population doubled during 2006–2014, mostly driven by the increasing size of this population, of which inpatient care accounted for 47%. GLDs constituted the smallest share of costs. CVD was the most resource-requiring disease group.

Suggested Citation

  • David Nathanson & Ugne Sabale & Jan W. Eriksson & Thomas Nyström & Anna Norhammar & Urban Olsson & Johan Bodegård, 2018. "Healthcare Cost Development in a Type 2 Diabetes Patient Population on Glucose-Lowering Drug Treatment: A Nationwide Observational Study 2006–2014," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 393-402, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:2:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-017-0063-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-017-0063-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-017-0063-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-017-0063-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molina, Begoña & Monereo, Susana, 2003. "Direct healthcare costs of diabetes mellitus patients in Spain," UC3M Working papers. Economics we036827, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatiana Dilla & Amparo Valladares & Claudia Nicolay & Javier Salvador & Jesús Reviriego & María Costi, 2012. "Healthcare Costs Associated with Change in Body Mass Index in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(6), pages 417-430, November.
    2. Till Seuring & Olga Archangelidi & Marc Suhrcke, 2015. "The Economic Costs of Type 2 Diabetes: A Global Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 811-831, August.
    3. Juan Oliva-Moreno & Julio López-Bastida & Rubén Osuna-Guerrero & Angel Montejo-González & Beatriz Duque-González, 2006. "The costs of schizophrenia in Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(3), pages 179-184, September.
    4. Travis Minor, 2011. "The effect of diabetes on female labor force decisions: new evidence from the National Health Interview Survey," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(12), pages 1468-1486, December.
    5. Mehdi Javanbakht & Hamid R Baradaran & Atefeh Mashayekhi & Ali Akbar Haghdoost & Mohammad E Khamseh & Erfan Kharazmi & Aboozar Sadeghi, 2011. "Cost-of-Illness Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Iran," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-7, October.
    6. Ebere Akobundu & Jing Ju & Lisa Blatt & C. Mullins, 2006. "Cost-of-Illness Studies," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 869-890, September.
    7. Arran Shearer & Adrian Bagust & F. Ampudia-Blasco & Belén Martínez-Lage Álvarez & Isabel Pérez Escolano & Gonzalo París, 2006. "Lifetime Health Consequences and Cost-effectiveness of Rosiglitazone in Combination with Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-59, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:2:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-017-0063-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.