IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v38y2020i8d10.1007_s40273-020-00910-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of Methodological Variation in Healthcare Provider Perspective Tuberculosis Costing Papers Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Settings, Using An Intervention-Standardised Unit Cost Typology

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Cunnama

    (University of Cape Town)

  • Gabriela B. Gomez

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Mariana Siapka

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Ben Herzel

    (University of California)

  • Jeremy Hill

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Angela Kairu

    (University of Cape Town)

  • Carol Levin

    (University of Washington)

  • Dickson Okello

    (University of Cape Town)

  • Willyanne DeCormier Plosky

    (Avenir Health)

  • Inés Garcia Baena

    (The World Health Organization)

  • Sedona Sweeney

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Anna Vassall

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Edina Sinanovic

    (University of Cape Town)

Abstract

Background There is a need for easily accessible tuberculosis unit cost data, as well as an understanding of the variability of methods used and reporting standards of that data. Objective The aim of this systematic review was to descriptively review papers reporting tuberculosis unit costs from a healthcare provider perspective looking at methodological variation; to assess quality using a study quality rating system and machine learning to investigate the indicators of reporting quality; and to identify the data gaps to inform standardised tuberculosis unit cost collection and consistent principles for reporting going forward. Methods We searched grey and published literature in five sources and eight databases, respectively, using search terms linked to cost, tuberculosis and tuberculosis health services including tuberculosis treatment and prevention. For inclusion, the papers needed to contain empirical unit cost estimates for tuberculosis interventions from low- and middle-income countries, with reference years between 1990 and 2018. A total of 21,691 papers were found and screened in a phased manner. Data were extracted from the eligible papers into a detailed Microsoft Excel tool, extensively cleaned and analysed with R software (R Project, Vienna, Austria) using the user interface of RStudio. A study quality rating was applied to the reviewed papers based on the inclusion or omission of a selection of variables and their relative importance. Following this, machine learning using a recursive partitioning method was utilised to construct a classification tree to assess the reporting quality. Results This systematic review included 103 provider perspective papers with 627 unit costs (costs not presented here) for tuberculosis interventions among a total of 140 variables. The interventions covered were active, passive and intensified case finding; tuberculosis treatment; above-service costs; and tuberculosis prevention. Passive case finding is the detection of tuberculosis cases where individuals self-identify at health facilities; active case finding is detection of cases of those not in health facilities, such as through outreach; and intensified case finding is detection of cases in high-risk populations. There was heterogeneity in some of the reported methods used such cost allocation, amortisation and the use of top-down, bottom-up or mixed approaches to the costing. Uncertainty checking through sensitivity analysis was only reported on by half of the papers (54%), while purposive and convenience sampling was reported by 72% of papers. Machine learning indicated that reporting on ‘Intervention’ (in particular), ‘Urbanicity’ and ‘Site Sampling’, were the most likely indicators of quality of reporting. The largest data gap identified was for tuberculosis vaccination cost data, the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine in particular. There is a gap in available unit costs for 12 of 30 high tuberculosis burden countries, as well as for the interventions of above-service costs, tuberculosis prevention, and active and intensified case finding. Conclusion Variability in the methods and reporting used makes comparison difficult and makes it hard for decision makers to know which unit costs they can trust. The study quality rating system used in this review as well as the classification tree enable focus on specific reporting aspects that should improve variability and increase confidence in unit costs. Researchers should endeavour to be explicit and transparent in how they cost interventions following the principles as laid out in the Global Health Cost Consortium’s Reference Case for Estimating the Costs of Global Health Services and Interventions, which in turn will lead to repeatability, comparability and enhanced learning from others.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Cunnama & Gabriela B. Gomez & Mariana Siapka & Ben Herzel & Jeremy Hill & Angela Kairu & Carol Levin & Dickson Okello & Willyanne DeCormier Plosky & Inés Garcia Baena & Sedona Sweeney & Anna Vass, 2020. "A Systematic Review of Methodological Variation in Healthcare Provider Perspective Tuberculosis Costing Papers Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Settings, Using An Intervention-Standardised Unit Cos," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(8), pages 819-837, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00910-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00910-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-020-00910-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-020-00910-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saunderson, Paul R., 1995. "An economic evaluation of alternative programme designs for tuberculosis control in rural Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1203-1212, May.
    2. Johns, Benjamin & Probandari, Ari & Mahendradhata, Yodi & Ahmad, Riris Andono, 2009. "An analysis of the costs and treatment success of collaborative arrangements among public and private providers for tuberculosis control in Indonesia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(2-3), pages 214-224, December.
    3. Thelma E Tupasi & Rajesh Gupta & Ma Imelda D Quelapio & Ruth B Orillaza & Nona Rachel Mira & Nellie V Mangubat & Virgil Belen & Nida Arnisto & Lualhati Macalintal & Michael Arabit & Jaime Y Lagahid & , 2006. "Feasibility and Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study in the Philippines," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-10, September.
    4. El-Sony, A.I., 2006. "The cost to health services of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection among tuberculosis patients in Sudan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 272-279, February.
    5. Sawert, Holger & Kongsin, Sukhontha & Payanandan, Vallop & Akarasewi, Pasakorn & Nunn, Paul P. & Raviglione, Mario C., 1997. "Costs and benefits of improving tuberculosis control: The case of Thailand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 44(12), pages 1805-1816, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoko Laurence & Ulla Griffiths & Anna Vassall, 2015. "Costs to Health Services and the Patient of Treating Tuberculosis: A Systematic Literature Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(9), pages 939-955, September.
    2. Jia Yin & Jinqiu Yuan & Yanhong Hu & Xiaolin Wei, 2016. "Association between Directly Observed Therapy and Treatment Outcomes in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Dillon, Andrew & Friedman, Jed & Serneels, Pieter, 2014. "Health Information, Treatment, and Worker Productivity: Experimental Evidence from Malaria Testing and Treatment among Nigerian Sugarcane Cutters," IZA Discussion Papers 8074, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Ainsworth, Martha & Beyrer, Chris & Soucat, Agnes, 2003. "AIDS and public policy: the lessons and challenges of `success' in Thailand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 13-37, April.
    5. Damian Walker & Julia A. Fox‐Rushby, 2000. "Economic evaluation of communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the published literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(8), pages 681-698, December.
    6. Loubiere, Sandrine & Boyer, Sylvie & Protopopescu, Camélia & Bonono, Cécile Renée & Abega, Séverin-Cécile & Spire, Bruno & Moatti, Jean-Paul, 2009. "Decentralization of HIV care in Cameroon: Increased access to antiretroviral treatment and associated persistent barriers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(2-3), pages 165-173, October.
    7. Su, Tin Tin & Sanon, Mamadou & Flessa, Steffen, 2007. "Assessment of indirect cost-of-illness in a subsistence farming society by using different valuation methods," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 353-362, October.
    8. Anatoly Vinokur & Joana Godinho & Christopher Dye & Nico Nagelkerke, 2001. "The TB and HIV/AIDS Epidemics in the Russian Federation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13965.
    9. Benjarin Santatiwongchai & Varit Chantarastapornchit & Thomas Wilkinson & Kittiphong Thiboonboon & Waranya Rattanavipapong & Damian G Walker & Kalipso Chalkidou & Yot Teerawattananon, 2015. "Methodological Variation in Economic Evaluations Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Information for Reference Case Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Tin Su & Steffen Flessa, 2013. "Determinants of household direct and indirect costs: an insight for health-seeking behaviour in Burkina Faso," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(1), pages 75-84, February.
    11. Eline L Korenromp & Philippe Glaziou & Christopher Fitzpatrick & Katherine Floyd & Mehran Hosseini & Mario Raviglione & Rifat Atun & Brian Williams, 2012. "Implementing the Global Plan to Stop TB, 2011–2015 – Optimizing Allocations and the Global Fund’s Contribution: A Scenario Projections Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-10, June.
    12. Yukari C Manabe & Sabine M Hermans & Mohammed Lamorde & Barbara Castelnuovo & C Daniel Mullins & Andreas Kuznik, 2012. "Rifampicin for Continuation Phase Tuberculosis Treatment in Uganda: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-9, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00910-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.