IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/0030352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility and Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Thelma E Tupasi
  • Rajesh Gupta
  • Ma Imelda D Quelapio
  • Ruth B Orillaza
  • Nona Rachel Mira
  • Nellie V Mangubat
  • Virgil Belen
  • Nida Arnisto
  • Lualhati Macalintal
  • Michael Arabit
  • Jaime Y Lagahid
  • Marcos Espinal
  • Katherine Floyd

Abstract

Background: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an important global health problem, and a control strategy known as DOTS-Plus has existed since 1999. However, evidence regarding the feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of DOTS-Plus is still limited. Methodology/Principal Findings: We evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of a DOTS-Plus pilot project established at Makati Medical Center in Manila, the Philippines, in 1999. Patients with MDR-TB are treated with regimens, including first- and second-line drugs, tailored to their drug susceptibility pattern (i.e., individualised treatment). We considered the cohort enrolled between April 1999 and March 2002. During this three-year period, 118 patients were enrolled in the project; 117 were considered in the analysis. Seventy-one patients (61%) were cured, 12 (10%) failed treatment, 18 (15%) died, and 16 (14%) defaulted. The average cost per patient treated was US$3,355 from the perspective of the health system, of which US$1,557 was for drugs, and US$837 from the perspective of patients. The mean cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) gained by the DOTS-Plus project was US$242 (range US$85 to US$426). Conclusions: Treatment of patients with MDR-TB using the DOTS-Plus strategy and individualised drug regimens can be feasible, comparatively effective, and cost-effective in low- and middle-income countries. Evaluation of 117 patients enrolled in a DOTS-Plus pilot project in the Philippines showed that in this setting the strategy is feasible. Background.: Tuberculosis (TB) causes the death of some 2 million people each year. An estimated one in three people worldwide are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacterium that causes the disease. Because single-drug treatment leads to treatment failure and antibiotic resistance, treatment for active TB is complicated, usually involving four different antibiotics, at least two of which are continued for six months or more. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a specific strategy (DOTS) for diagnosing and treating TB (see Web link below). Why Was This Study Done?: Because the use of second-line antibiotics is costly and the treatment of MDR-TB has a higher failure rate than that of fully drug-susceptible TB, policymakers responsible for allocation of limited healthcare resources need information on how well DOTS-Plus programmes work and how much they cost to operate. This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of a DOTS-Plus project in the Philippines, a lower middle–income country with a high rate of TB and approximately 25,000 cases of MDR-TB. What Did the Researchers Do and Find? : The researchers reported on a DOTS-Plus pilot project at Makati Medical Center in Manila, analyzing information from 118 patients enrolled in the project between 1999 and 2002. The diagnosis of MDR-TB was based on laboratory culture and antibiotic resistance testing of specimens from patients who had continued symptoms of TB following DOTS treatment, or other evidence of possible MDR-TB. Patients were treated with five-drug combinations individually selected based on resistance testing results, and administered under direct observation. After cultures had remained consistently negative for six months, patients were switched to a four-drug regimen with intermittent clinic observation until cultures remained negative for at least 18 months. What Do These Findings Mean?: The cure rate for MDR-TB in this project compares favourably to rates in other resource-limited settings where second-line TB drugs are used, and is much higher than in areas where these drugs are not available. From the standpoint of efficacy and patient well-being, then, this study supports the necessity of DOTS-Plus treatment. In purely economic terms, the cost of US$200–US$250 per DALY gained is cost-effective in comparison with other healthcare interventions. Specifically, because the gross national income per person in the Philippines is US$1,080, someone who can return to work following MDR-TB treatment costing US$250 per year gained of working life will provide work that is worth four times more, on average, than the cost of the treatment. Additional Information. : Please access these Web sites via the online version of this summary at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030352.

Suggested Citation

  • Thelma E Tupasi & Rajesh Gupta & Ma Imelda D Quelapio & Ruth B Orillaza & Nona Rachel Mira & Nellie V Mangubat & Virgil Belen & Nida Arnisto & Lualhati Macalintal & Michael Arabit & Jaime Y Lagahid & , 2006. "Feasibility and Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study in the Philippines," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:0030352
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030352&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjarin Santatiwongchai & Varit Chantarastapornchit & Thomas Wilkinson & Kittiphong Thiboonboon & Waranya Rattanavipapong & Damian G Walker & Kalipso Chalkidou & Yot Teerawattananon, 2015. "Methodological Variation in Economic Evaluations Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Information for Reference Case Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Jia Yin & Jinqiu Yuan & Yanhong Hu & Xiaolin Wei, 2016. "Association between Directly Observed Therapy and Treatment Outcomes in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Lucy Cunnama & Gabriela B. Gomez & Mariana Siapka & Ben Herzel & Jeremy Hill & Angela Kairu & Carol Levin & Dickson Okello & Willyanne DeCormier Plosky & Inés Garcia Baena & Sedona Sweeney & Anna Vass, 2020. "A Systematic Review of Methodological Variation in Healthcare Provider Perspective Tuberculosis Costing Papers Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Settings, Using An Intervention-Standardised Unit Cos," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(8), pages 819-837, August.
    4. Eline L Korenromp & Philippe Glaziou & Christopher Fitzpatrick & Katherine Floyd & Mehran Hosseini & Mario Raviglione & Rifat Atun & Brian Williams, 2012. "Implementing the Global Plan to Stop TB, 2011–2015 – Optimizing Allocations and the Global Fund’s Contribution: A Scenario Projections Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-10, June.
    5. Yukari C Manabe & Sabine M Hermans & Mohammed Lamorde & Barbara Castelnuovo & C Daniel Mullins & Andreas Kuznik, 2012. "Rifampicin for Continuation Phase Tuberculosis Treatment in Uganda: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-9, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:0030352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.